WHY SYMPATHY OVER QASEM SOLEIMANI ASSASINATION???

[imadul]

Chief Commander of Al'Quds Force Qaesm Soleimani under orders from Iranian Theocracy, Vilayat-Faqih, is responsible for the obliteration of about 511,000 Syrians, mostly Sunni Muslims, 6.7 million refugees of which 3.6 million only in Turkey. This guy was the chief orchestrator of these atrocities in Syria as well as in Iraq and Yemen.
Iran used its power just to increase its political and military clout, they had no respect of innocent dying, even for non-Iranian Shia Muslims who were used as pawns and cannon fodder in Syria and Oraq by Iranian Mollahs and this guy was schemer and executioner of all that.

Iran will pay the price of its evilness.

 

[Kaniska]

Chief Commander of Al'Quds Force Qaesm Soleimani under orders from Iranian Theocracy, Vilayat-Faqih, is responsible for the obliteration of about 511,000 Syrians, mostly Sunni Muslims, 6.7 million refugees of which 3.6 million only in Turkey. This guy was the chief orchestrator of these atrocities in Syria as well as in Iraq and Yemen.
Iran used its power just to increase its political and military clout, they had no respect of innocent dying, even for non-Iranian Shia Muslims who were used as pawns and cannon fodder in Syria and Oraq by Iranian Mollahs and this guy was schemer and executioner of all that.

Iran will pay the price of its evilness.

if that is the case, why do you have a KL summit of all the powerful Muslim nations last month.If Pakistan can not been sympathize with Iran at such time then what kind of unity or group you guys are talking in KL?

 

[Clutch]

if that is the case, why do you have a KL summit of all the powerful Muslim nations last month.If Pakistan can not been sympathize with Iran at such time then what kind of unity or group you guys are talking in KL?

Because of this... Skip to 13:00 for the start of why not Iran, Iraq, or even USSA should be supported... This is a war we should stay out of ...

 

[Patriot786b2]

Watch
General Soleimani assassination is equal to General Zia Ul Haq's assassination by CIA.
When Pakistan during late 1980's was getting stronger by the down fall of Soviet Empire in Afghanistan, the Americans quickly killed General Zia through third party parties in order for Pakistan to remain submissive. This act of killing General Soleimani is totally equal to killing Genreal Zia Ul Haq back than as he was expert in Spying process and could predict U.S. forces movement in 2 days advance for the Iranian forces along the border. Similiarly General Zia was going to purchace 200 M1-Abrams main battle tanks for Pak Army before he was killed. May he Rest in Peace.

 

[Sine Nomine]

Chief Commander of Al'Quds Force Qaesm Soleimani under orders from Iranian Theocracy, Vilayat-Faqih, is responsible for the obliteration of about 511,000 Syrians, mostly Sunni Muslims, 6.7 million refugees of which 3.6 million only in Turkey. This guy was the chief orchestrator of these atrocities in Syria as well as in Iraq and Yemen.
Iran used its power just to increase its political and military clout, they had no respect of innocent dying, even for non-Iranian Shia Muslims who were used as pawns and cannon fodder in Syria and Oraq by Iranian Mollahs and this guy was schemer and executioner of all that.

Iran will pay the price of its evilness.

He is dead now,what he did now is in between effected parties,him and Almighty.

 

[Meengla]

The media in Pakistan, as far as I have seen, is calling Q. Suleimani as a 'martyr'. I think part of that is the knee-jerk Anti-Americanism which started after 9/11 in Pakistan and gained a lot of foothold after the Salala attack on Pakistani soldiers few years ago. The raid on Bin Laden--which was helped by Pakistan-- sealed the Anti-Americanism because Pakistanis rightly felt betrayed: We helped you get Bin Laden and yet you humiliated us (Leon Panetta should be blamed for the rift). But this is a different topic.

Pakistan's policy should be strict neutrality! Iran has placed itself into a strategic dilemma: If Iran doesn't have a means to target Israel and the Gulf Arab countries then Iran will get attacked. But this dilemma was Iran's own choice by design! A B-Grade power poking a superpower and its' rich allies.

However, I don't buy these arguments that it is 'Iran now, and Pakistan next'. United States doesn't have any deep animosity toward Pakistan except to make Pakistan tow the Indian line against China. It's a goal Washington wants but it's not hellbent on getting the goal. There are other theaters and means to contain China.

As for this idea that Suleimani threatened Pakistan, well, the Iranians are apparently another loud-mouth country just like other Middle Eastern country leadership with the exception of Israel. But I don't think Iran ever wanted or needed a war against Pakistan: At most an expectation that Pakistan won't bow down to Washington and Arab countries' demands against Iran--and that's not an unreasonable expectation. So basing anti-Iran strategic posture on a few loudmouth statements and on sporadic border skirmishes is definitely wrong path to take!

Pakistan must provide all humanitarian aid to Iran in case of a war and strive hard for peace, but remains neutral. And that's what Pakistani planners are almost certainly going to do!

 

[Dubious]

The media in Pakistan, is calling Q. Suleimani as a 'martyr'.

THAT is the problem!

 

[ziaulislam]

Chief Commander of Al'Quds Force Qaesm Soleimani under orders from Iranian Theocracy, Vilayat-Faqih, is responsible for the obliteration of about 511,000 Syrians, mostly Sunni Muslims, 6.7 million refugees of which 3.6 million only in Turkey. This guy was the chief orchestrator of these atrocities in Syria as well as in Iraq and Yemen.
Iran used its power just to increase its political and military clout, they had no respect of innocent dying, even for non-Iranian Shia Muslims who were used as pawns and cannon fodder in Syria and Oraq by Iranian Mollahs and this guy was schemer and executioner of all that.

Iran will pay the price of its evilness.

having said, iran will simply use his death to acheive its goal..get iraq..now Americans will be forced to leave iraq making it virtually an iranian colony

so in other words in the game of chess iran sacrificed a knight to take iraq queen...next is USA move and i dont see any move it can make to save the iraqi king..its going to fall..check mate by iran

if usa ignores the call to leave by iraqi parliment its going to hurt its soft image..if it follows and leaves its check mate...
iran worked hard to first topple iraqi govt, than form fractured govt and all it needed was a simple push ..usa provided that

iran knows trump will not go to war if not provocated and will go if provocated..they will thus nt retilate and take iraq as a spoil of this conflict

now the next piece is lebanon and seems iran is winning

mean while arabs waste their time with turkey and libyia

 

[Myth_buster_1]

Chief Commander of Al'Quds Force Qaesm Soleimani under orders from Iranian Theocracy, Vilayat-Faqih, is responsible for the obliteration of about 511,000 Syrians, mostly Sunni Muslims, 6.7 million refugees of which 3.6 million only in Turkey. This guy was the chief orchestrator of these atrocities in Syria as well as in Iraq and Yemen.
Iran used its power just to increase its political and military clout, they had no respect of innocent dying, even for non-Iranian Shia Muslims who were used as pawns and cannon fodder in Syria and Oraq by Iranian Mollahs and this guy was schemer and executioner of all that.

Iran will pay the price of its evilness.

Because Pakistanis are idiots and forget that a lot of anti pakistani element in Baluchistan get support from Iran and want to do bhund panga with every one in name of umma chumma while their own country get betrayed over and over again by the same country they try to rescue.
Pakistan needs to stay out of this mess and if they try to be mediator then the will be dragged in this mess.

 

[SIPRA]

The media in Pakistan, as far as I have seen, is calling Q. Suleimani as a 'martyr'. I think part of that is the knee-jerk Anti-Americanism which started after 9/11 in Pakistan and gained a lot of foothold after the Salala attack on Pakistani soldiers few years ago. The raid on Bin Laden--which was helped by Pakistan-- sealed the Anti-Americanism because Pakistanis rightly felt betrayed: We helped you get Bin Laden and yet you humiliated us (Leon Panetta should be blamed for the rift). But this is a different topic.

Pakistan's policy should be strict neutrality! Iran has placed itself into a strategic dilemma: If Iran doesn't have a means to target Israel and the Gulf Arab countries then Iran will get attacked. But this dilemma was Iran's own choice by design! A B-Grade power poking a superpower and its' rich allies.

However, I don't buy these arguments that it is 'Iran now, and Pakistan next'. United States doesn't have any deep animosity toward Pakistan except to make Pakistan tow the Indian line against China. It's a goal Washington wants but it's not hellbent on getting the goal. There are other theaters and means to contain China.

As for this idea that Suleimani threatened Pakistan, well, the Iranians are apparently another loud-mouth country just like other Middle Eastern country leadership with the exception of Israel. But I don't think Iran ever wanted or needed a war against Pakistan: At most an expectation that Pakistan won't bow down to Washington and Arab countries' demands against Iran--and that's not an unreasonable expectation. So basing anti-Iran strategic posture on a few loudmouth statements and on sporadic border skirmishes is definitely wrong path to take!

Pakistan must provide all humanitarian aid to Iran in case of a war and strive hard for peace, but remains neutral. And that's what Pakistani planners are almost certainly going to do!

Excellent post.

 

[Valar.]

What sympathy? He was a terrorist and he died like a terrorist.

 

[imadul]

He is dead now,what he did now is in between effected parties,him and Almighty.

But Iranian theocracy still there on whose orders about 1/2 a million Sunni Muslims were massacred in Syria.

 

[Yousafzai_M]

General Suleimani is a martyr. He was a brilliant soldier and killed in a terrorist act simply because he was winning.

I see this post is going full retard, blaming Iran for the killings in Syria!

 

[El Sidd]

We believe in upholding international law and diplomacy over unilateral aggression.

This is a basic fundamental policy of the State.

 

[Valar.]

General Suleimani is a martyr. He was a brilliant soldier and killed in a terrorist act simply because he was winning.

I see this post is going full retard, blaming Iran for the killings in Syria!

One terrorist fighting another terrorist for their own terror supremacy does not make any of them a good guy. Both are evil and both have nothing to do with us.

Supporting terrorism won't take you anywhere, humanity will.

Repent.