What's new

Why Pakistan is coming down hard on Iran

The country’s overstretched patience with its southwestern neighbour is wearing thin over the Baloch insurgency.​


In the dead of night on January 25, dozens of militants bearing advanced assault rifles and night-vision devices swooped down on a solitary paramilitary checkpost in Kech, some 180 km from Pakistan’s border with Iran, in the southwestern province of Balochistan. The sudden assault lasted for more than five hours, claiming the lives of 10 Pakistani troopers. The attackers reportedly fled to Iran.

The attack was later claimed by the Baloch Liberation Front (BLF), one of the most lethal Baloch separatist groups stoking a decades-long armed struggle against the Pakistan Army, which operates out of southeastern Iran.

While relations between Iran and Pakistan have steadily deteriorated over cross-border militancy in the past few years, analysts assess that the sharp increase in terrorist attacks since last year, mainly in Pakistan’s restive Balochistan province, has put the country's security establishment on tenterhooks.

Three days after the attack in Kech, Pakistan’s Federal Investigation Agency stumbled upon a surprising discovery in the backroom of a money exchange company in Karachi. They found a network funneling millions of rupees from "a foreign intelligence agency" to proscribed militant groups in the country. Thirteen employees were rounded up, and days later, a senior bureaucrat was arrested in connection with the raid.

While the foreign intelligence agency behind the racket was barely identified in press conferences and local media coverage, a senior security official, on condition of anonymity, confirmed to TRT World that it belonged to Iran.

Then, on February 2, a coordinated attack on the paramilitary Frontier Corps headquarters in the towns of Panjgur and Noshki — areas close to the Iran border and the Baloch-majority regions in Afghanistan, respectively —stunned the nation. It took the army three days to clear the sites of the suicide attackers who, it said, were trained in Afghanistan by the Indian intelligence.

On February 14, Iran’s interior minister Ahmad Vahidi arrived in Islamabad for a day-long visit with the Commander of the Iranian Border Guards, Brigadier General Ahmad Ali Goudarzi, among other high-ranking officials.

While Pakistani leadership hailed the historic “brotherly ties” with Iran, privately the delegation was given a stern warning: “He was given the message that we know [about the use of Iranian soil by Baloch insurgents]. If there are more attacks, we will take decisive action,” says the security official, who is privy to details of the meeting.

FILE: In 2019, Baloch insurgents attacked Chinese engineers and its consulate in Karachi to deter investment in Balochistan.
FILE: In 2019, Baloch insurgents attacked Chinese engineers and its consulate in Karachi to deter investment in Balochistan. (AP)
Baloch havens

The tri-border region of Nimroz in Afghanistan, an ethnic Baloch-dominated province straddling Pakistan and Iran in the south, is notorious for its powerful smuggling rackets dealing in weapons, opium, and human trafficking. To its east is the Helmand province, where vast poppy fields feed the global opium trade. This is also the region, along with Kandahar to its east, that welcomed fleeing Baloch brethren when former President General Pervez Musharraf ordered a military operation against Baloch insurgents in 2006. Many Baloch separatist leaders coordinated attacks on Pakistani security personnel and Chinese investments in Balochistan during the Afghan war.

When the Taliban took Kabul last year, they launched a swift crackdown on Baloch refugees and handed over many dissidents to the Pakistani authorities. Many Baloch rebels had already gone into hiding after assassination attempts in Kandahar, allegedly ordered by Pakistani officials over the past two years.

As a result, Baloch refugees have now moved west to Nimroz and into the Iranian province of Sistan and Baluchestan. Some have returned and regrouped in Pakistani Balochistan as well. Regrouping has lent them renewed vigour and purpose. Baloch separatists carried out five attacks in January alone, despite the government’s offer of a dialogue.

According to a 2021 security report from the Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies, the districts of Kech and Panjgur, close to the Iranian border, were among the hardest hit by Baloch insurgents between January and December of last year.

“It seems that Pakistan has now reached a tipping point [in dealing with Iran],” says Abdul Basit, a research fellow at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore.

The sophistication of weapons and the ability to conduct complex coordinated attacks through the use of suicide missions are unprecedented.

“Attacks are being carried out at night through sniper rifles. Earlier, [Pakistani] drones would deter them. Now they [Baloch rebels] don’t give a hoot about it,” he adds.

Complicated relationship

In the face of increasing ethno-sectarian violence, Pakistani authorities are in a bind. Open confrontation with Iran could antagonize a sizable Shia community that makes up roughly 20 percent of the population and open a new front of tensions with Iran at a time when the Pakistan Army is already stretched thin on the borders with India. It also risks stoking sectarian fault lines that Pakistan largely overcame after the bloodshed of the 90s.

However, slowly but surely, Pakistan’s intelligence officials appear to be deliberately leaking stories to the media about Iranian-backed militancy, notes Basit. The move signals the intelligence community’s frustration with a government that wants to avoid open confrontation with its neighbour.

“Iran has kept these [ethno-nationalist and sectarian] groups as counterweights to use to turn up the heat in case Pakistan facilitates Jundullah and Jaish ul-Adl,” he says, referring to Iranian Baluch rebel groups said to have safe havens in Pakistan.

“In Pakistan's case, Iran's revolutionary rulers have been in competition since the 1990s over Afghanistan and their role in the Gulf,” says Ahmed Quraishi, an Islamabad-based journalist with expertise in the MENA region. (Middle East & North Africa)

“It makes sense that Khomeinists in Iran would like to limit any Pakistani role in Afghanistan and in the Gulf region through domestic pressure operations,” he said.

The Saudi factor

In 2013, Iran began recruiting young Shia men from north and western Pakistan for its Zainabiyyoun Brigade to fight for the protection of Muslim shrines in Syria. Esmail Qaani, the current chief of the Quds Force — the international arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps—who at the time oversaw the Afpak region under his predecessor, Qasem Soleimani, spent years cultivating local terror networks. But at the height of the Covid-19 outbreak in 2020, when Iran forced Pakistan to open its border for returning Shia pilgrims, many fighters were also pushed over.

While the intelligence assessment of the time discounted any security threat from the returning fighters, they were still kept under watch.

It was not until last year that several alleged Zainabiyyoun Brigade operatives were rounded up as the US decided to leave Afghanistan. In June last year, a “Red Book” issued by the Counter Terrorism Department of the provincial Sindh Police also listed 24 members of the pro-Iran sectarian group, Sipah-e-Muhammad Pakistan, as most wanted.

Interestingly, the string of arrests linked to Iran last year coincided with the thaw in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan relations.

The two countries fell out over the Saudi-led Organization of Islamic Council’s nonchalance around the Kashmir issue when India unilaterally changed its special status to a union territory in October 2019. Saudi Arabia had abruptly asked for $3million in loan repayments, while the UAE, a close ally of the Saudis, banned new work visas for Pakistanis.

In May 2021, backdoor diplomacy paved the way for Prime Minister Imran Khan’s visit to Jeddah that reset soured relations.

Pakistani authorities reopened a criminal investigation into the 2011 murder of a Saudi diplomat in Karachi six months later and sent a letter to Iranian authorities asking for “legal help” in apprehending the alleged killer, a Sipah-e-Muhammad worker believed to be hiding in Iran.

The following month, the Saudis revived a $3 billion loan and offered a $1.2 billion oil facility on deferred payment.

Most significantly, the Saudi Interior Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Saud bin Naif visited Islamabad on February 7, following the daring Baloch attacks on the Frontier Corps, with an offer of closer cooperation in intelligence sharing against Iranian proxy groups operating in Pakistan. A week later, Iran’s Interior Minister Vahidy was confronted in Islamabad with evidence of Baloch havens in Iran.

Last week’s arrest of another member of the pro-Iran Mehdi group, in connection with the 2011 attack on Karachi’s Saudi Consulate, is seen as further proof of Pak-Saudi joint intel operations.

It appears that the Saudis and the Emiratis have been rewarding Pakistan’s loyalty in kind. The UAE authorities picked up Pakistani businessman Hafeez Baloch from Dubai on Jan 27 and handed him over to Pakistan over suspicion of terror financing.
 
.
It is sad (but not concerning) to see the foreign propagated efforts to give rise to anti-Iran/shia extremism in Pakistan. The article is full of irrelevant stupid conjectures and claims were written by someone with an agenda clearly. I would answer it line by line if it was an Iranian forum but we are guests here and not free to talk openly. All I would say is that some fake stories in the article do not even make sense. TRT is a Turkish propaganda news agency and Turkey recently bent over for Israelis, so we might see more trash coming from Turkey against Iran in the coming days. If they have chosen this path then so be it, like we are scared of anyone.
No, you are quite free here. When I search the forum for some keywords related with Turkey, 50-60% Iranian members messages appear. The number of messages that do not contain insults, threats or false/fake news style propaganda is perhaps 20% at most. Espically during the Karabakh war, anti-Turkey propaganda was constantly and systematically made in the Iranian media. In many Iranian media content and translations that I have seen on social media, I have noticed that there is a very serious and significant general understanding that defines Turkey as a direct source of threat. These media activities naturally trigger Iranian social media also.

Still, some Iranian members of the forum continue to share nonsense news here and try to create a perception. At least 3-4 members regularly bring stupid anti-propaganda content about Turkey to the forum in the topic reserved for the conversation of Iranians. In stark contrast to the friendship and goodwill Turkey has shown you, mostly you have a meaningless anti-Turkey sentiment. I reported one of them. He was the most obsessive troll I've seen lately, 95 of the last 100 messages he wrote were anti-Turkey propaganda. Even waz was stunned when he realized the situation.

Regarding the situation in Turkey: Nothing to worry about, there is nothing noteworthy about anti-Iranian content in the Turkish national media. In fact, there is almost nothing about Iran. Despite Iran's many social and economic problems and its irresponsible activities in other countries, they are not covered in the mainstream media. The general public perception is not negative either. Compared to Israel, it is in a much better position; Although there is no difference between the two in terms of Turkish interests... At least half of the mainstream media in Turkey is openly anti-Israeli and publishes anti-Israeli reports on a constant and regular basis. Even trt-world, which you accuse of being anti-Iran, has published dozens of news in this field on its website and channel.

The editorial team, which covers Trtworld Pakistan news, is one of the major journalist groups that embrace the Kashmir issue internationally. Most of them are Pakistani. (The journalist who wrote this report is also a Pakistani living in Karachi) The same group has made dozens of news stories targeting the Indian government directly in recent years. The same group worked very actively at trt-world during the Myanmar massacres.

The fact that instead of explaining what's wrong with the report, making assumptions about a whole country by instrumentalizing an exceptional report, would be a very shortsighted view that would only produce a very unfounded worry.
 
Last edited:
.
عَسٰى رَبُّكُمْ اَنْ يَّرْحَمَكُمْۚ وَاِنْ عُدْتُّمْ عُدْنَاۘ وَجَعَلْنَا جَهَنَّمَ لِلْكٰفِرِيْنَ حَصِيْرًا

Would appreciate a translation with context :)

Anyways, the country you are living in is more deserving of your loyalty than some molvis in another land.
 
.
Who is "we" here?

Problem here is Iran--not Shia Iran or XYZ Iran. I couldn't care less about the brand of secterianism they adhere to. Problem here is their active policy of hosting enemies of Pakistan. And solution that is being discussed is returning them the favour.

So please do clarify who is "we"? If "we" is the bunch of assholes selling out this country's security interests then "we" will be punished, one day.
 
.
It is baffling how so many Pakistanis do no not see the threat that the Mullah regime in Iran represents, the sooner you swallow the pill the better, its not getting smaller but for sure it can get bigger.
 
. .
Who is "we" here?

Problem here is Iran--not Shia Iran or XYZ Iran. I couldn't care less about the brand of secterianism they adhere to. Problem here is their active policy of hosting enemies of Pakistan. And solution that is being discussed is returning them the favour.

So please do clarify who is "we"? If "we" is the bunch of assholes selling out this country's security interests then "we" will be punished, one day.
People like ahaider97 makes me so angry, they're blinded and are a security risk to the country because of "we"

It is baffling how so many Pakistanis do no not see the threat that the Mullah regime in Iran represents, the sooner you swallow the pill the better, its not getting smaller but for sure it can get bigger.
We know but there's no will to respond as we face India and for the majority of people Iran is a brotherly country

you in arab lands have historical beef with them but for us its opposite as part of our culture is influenced by them that builds soft power - so no public or political support for it
They have to really turn up the heat for us to respond
@Naram_Sin
 
Last edited:
.
All you guys acting like Iran doesn't also have the same problem...
 
.
I am an ignoramus on this - but curious- does the Pakistani state sponsor separatists against Iran from our territory or look the other way? Or is it more of an issue that the State can’t enforce its writ? Same question(s) but for the Iranian state?

I know it sounds simple but I think the ideal solution depends a lot on what the answer to the above 4 questions. Any takers?
 
.
I am an ignoramus on this - but curious- does the Pakistani state sponsor separatists against Iran from our territory or look the other way? Or is it more of an issue that the State can’t enforce its writ? Same question(s) but for the Iranian state?

I know it sounds simple but I think the ideal solution depends a lot on what the answer to the above 4 questions. Any takers?
Borderlands of balochistan are hard to control , both sides suffer although because our balochistan is much bigger so we have more of a problem

Much bigger problem/contention is fatamiyun and secretion proxies - also gcc also doesn't like that these men are usually pakistanis
So our ties with gcc also suffers
 
.
People like ahaider97 makes me so angry, they're blinded and are a security risk to the country because of "we"


We know but there's no will to respond as we face India and for the majority of people Iran is a brotherly country

you in arab lands have historical beef with them but for us its opposite as part of our culture is influenced by them that builds soft power - so no public or political support for it
They have to really turn up the heat for us to respond
@Naram_Sin
They are overtly recruiting Pakistanis to fight for their own interests, one can conclude with near certainty that they already have covert cells all over Pakistan, what else does one need to take note ?
 
.
The Zionists are openly backing the PKK against Turkey. I can't understand Turkeys policy when it comes to the Zionists.

Isn’t PKK over? They don’t have significant activity nowadays or am I wrong?
 
.
The PKK have similar organisations or sister organisations in Iraq and Syria. They all have the same agenda and similar backers. I think it would be naïve to suggest the Iranians are wrong in saying the Zionists are using Iraqi Kurdistan for operations against Iran,
 
.
Back
Top Bottom