The overwhelming evidence is that the British East Indian Army of West Pakistan has turned the country into a failed state. I can quote 100 different facts to prove that.
You seem like an intelligent person to me. Why you continue to support the Bajwa doctrine of perpetuating failure is beyond my ability to understand.
You can frame that evidence and hang it in your neck. I asked you not to follow the herd so get out of the low IQ rut.
What you should be asking is :
How can a "civilian based defense" or "social defense" become effective in Pakistan ?
What can fuel a civil resistance to make it potent in Pakistan's political scenario ? (think why I asked this and how it conforms to military)
Why was lawyers movement effective against Military rule in the past and
can it be advantageous again ?
Which practical steps can help in a nonviolent revolution for "direct action" or should the path of "diversity of tactics" be taken against the establishment ?
Now for the last question - what is the first basic step that can be taken to weaken ISI in regards to its political wing ?
The reason you should have been asking these questions is because a very few members including myself know the military system very well. Using your brains you could have gathered the information about weak points of military and ISI (not the crap that media tells you), and how could those be exploited to be used in favor of the public.
Instead of abusing and cursing (not you but generally), which has zero effect in reality, if you had seen my posts, I kept giving information how Military leadership goes on and about its matters in HQs, how does top brass think and handles matters etc. Any person with an above average IQ would have used that information from me, Blain and others to form a realistic approach towards analyzing the military and comparing it with media reports, but the information that i gave was always countered as if I am defending.
Learn to understand
how to use information and differentiate its from how the rest of the herd perceives it. More than a year ago, a TT mentioned that atmosphere on PDF has alighted and set ablaze so certain point of views will bring massive backlash now so its better to avoid them, I said to him that where's the fun in that ? I stepped out the opposite way, I decided not the follow the herd and I never will. Anyways, I wont make this post an essay, I just gave you a direction how you should be thinking.