jamahir
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 28,132
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Yes hindus are a problem now . They vote BJP .
I spoke of Hindutvadis, not Hindus. There are many Hindus who don't support BJP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes hindus are a problem now . They vote BJP .
Now Hadid by ayesha father is false ?Absolute bullsh!t.
You repeated and tried to legitimize the false hadith which was quoted by your BJP Hindutva fanatics.
Also, you don't understand the word hypocrisy. India is a hypocrite because it claims to be a secular nation.
Ditto so-called secular France which has more holidays based on Christianity than any other European country, and which passes laws exempting and allowing Christian customs while denying others.
Israel is called out, not because it is a Jewish state, which it has every right to be, but because it claims to be a liberal democracy, which it is not.
As Indian trolls go, you are not a very bright one. Maybe it's time you came back with a different ID and tried to not give yourself away so easily.
Now Hadid by ayesha father is false ?
China's abuses of Muslims? Hang on a second. Wasn't the slogan of the Urumqi rioters "Kill the Han, Kill the Hui?" Hui are China's largest Muslim minority. The rioters were Uyghurs. Are the Mulism nations going to condemn them(Uighur) for their long history of violence against Muslims?
In case of china no reaction from muslim nations
Wrong. Hadith isn't from her dad, but a grand nephew born two years after her passing away. It is the only source thus doubtful. Her reported age conflicts with the fact that she was previously engaged to an enemy of the Prophet named Jubayr Ibn Mutim. His father was an enemy too. We know Aisha's father accepted the Prophet before she was born, thus it is practically impossible to have him engage his daughter to an enemy of the belief in God and His Prophet, who was her father's top priority. It also conflicts with the age of her older sister Asma who died in 695. She was ten years older than Aisha and going by that she was born in 605 making her about 9 years older than her Bukhari age.Now Hadid by ayesha father is false ?
Now Hadid by ayesha father is false ?
Then why do you guys even allow such people to talk on Islam and there is no out cry when they said the same thing as the nupur sharma.Wrong. Hadith isn't from her dad, but a grand nephew born two years after her passing away. It is the only source thus doubtful. Her reported age conflicts with the fact that she was previously engaged to an enemy of the Prophet named Jubayr Ibn Mutim. His father was an enemy too. We know Aisha's father accepted the Prophet before she was born, thus it is practically impossible to have him engage his daughter to an enemy of the belief in God and His Prophet, who was her father's top priority. It also conflicts with the age of her older sister Asma who died in 695. She was ten years older than Aisha and going by that she was born in 605 making her about 9 years older than her Bukhari age.
Then why do you guys even allow such people to talk on Islam and there is no out cry when they said the same thing as the nupur sharma.