SpArK
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 5, 2010
- Messages
- 22,519
- Reaction score
- 18
- Country
- Location
Why don't you translate it for us ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why don't you translate it for us ?
I am not promoting any religious viewpoint here.
Stating that religious dictates of one religion must not apply to other religions is not promoting religious view point.
And needless to say that those who don't agree to your Hindutva view point are not criminals.
How it is relevant here? There are vegetarian Hindus, non-vegetarian Hindus, beef eating Hindus, pork eating Hindus, chicken eating Hindus (which was a taboo in the past), there are other Indians belonging to other faiths, and there are atheists, all of them don't need to follow your Hindutva rules.
Instead of beating around the bush, why don't you just tell us what Hindu Scriptures you believe in ?
............ this is embarrassing for you. Are you saying you do not know what you have posted ?
I ask again, please provide the translation. I am willing to wait as long as necessary.
Irrelevant.
...................................................................
.........................................?
.................................................
Not correct.
Though Caste is mostly fixed, it go up and down the laddar with ease. Caste is 1000CE onward phenomenon and it originated from artisan guilds, distinct profession, Tribal identities, and warring clan culture. There is no metion of caste system in whole HIndu literature. It is not equivalent to varna system. The difference of mobility in varna system and caste system is that , while in Varna system an individual could change his social position on his own (Vishwamitra is a obvious example that comes to my mind) ; in latter day caste system , it is whole caste which goes up or down. An individual by himself could not caste, but he could lose caste and become an outcaste , a Chandala, if he eats meat. Caste ,today, are fixed by government decree, not be social and religious norms.
Correction: Aryabhatta studied at Kusumapura university, not Nalanda.
Nalanda was a predominantly Buddhist religious university. Most of Hindus preferred Takshashila for non-Religious education and Kashi for religious.
Let me make it easier for you, admit you were a fool and that you do not know what it says and I will translate it for you ............ how does that sound ?
That is the ONLY thing relevant here.
You are the one going around claiming that Beef eating is permitted for Hindus. So why are you beating around the Bush ?
Just come straight to the point.
Which Hindu scriptures do you follow ? What hindu scripture do you believe in ?
I am not asking you to follow my rules, I am asking YOUR RULES ............ why is that so confusing ? Its a fairly simple and straight forward question.
IRRELEVANT!
My rules need not apply to you and your rules don't apply on me, and certainly not on non-Hindus and atheists.
you are promoting your view point. How does it matter where it comes from ? ........ maybe it comes from a deep seated hatred. That is your problem, not mine.
You are not required to agree with me as to who constitutes a "criminal". the Majority decides and then you do get have a choice in the matter. If you are a criminal, you get treated like one. You are free to protest, but it makes not one iota of difference.
Irrelevant baseless blabbering. Mobs don't rule this country.