Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ICBM - Against whom?
US - historical ally,
China- brotherly ally
Russia- Dont mess with Ivan
Europe- Why mess with honeymoon locations
Australia- Only of they refuse to tour next series.
Pakistan has all the himmat needed to fight India, when it comes to others the only himmat is needed to say no to any drone/cia stuff, no need to pull out the big guns.
Have you ever wondered why is america/india/israel not fighting malaysia, Indonesia, bangladesh, they too are muslim countries, as a matter of fact India has a huge muslim population too.
The fight is over oil, strategic locations, not over religion. No one care about fighting Islam, frankly religion is no longer a bone of contention to fight over
The problem is not getting an ICBM, it is in having the himmat to launch one.
still i wonder , why in norway if anyone openly kills 77 people and claims he did against Muslims being in Europe is called 'cold hearted killer' and if any Muslim kills one to 2 people on his own will, is called terrorist... double standards???
most terror attacks which claimed lives in the recent past have been associated with muslim, hence the stereotype.
no its not this, its what is being shown and said by world media.... there are more terrorist attacks on Muslims then any other people, do you know how many innocent muslims being killed after 9/11 for no reasons????
What do you mean by "most terror attacks which claimed lives" ??? you think killings of Muslims doesn't comes under this????
Pakistan never initiated on Nuclear or Missile testing.
Mr Vajpayee was the best thing that happened to Pakistan, hadn't he gone ahead to test India's atomic weapons, Pakistan's nuclear Genie may have never come out, the world today may still have been pondering.
Now another Indian reckless leadership has thrown the gauntlet. !!!
We are grateful to Mr Vajpayee and we now say thank you to MMS & Co.
Pakistan and Pakistanis are not afraid. They will do whatever suits its national interests
shooting down the drones is in National interest of Pakistan ?
A critical study of the drone saga shows that drone strikes occurred only in areas that the Army was absent. If the drone strikes over the last one and a half year are taken into consideration, they ALL occured in NWA. The only remaining area in FATA where the Army is not in control. So my question to you is, how can Pakistan shoot down drones in territories where members of it's armed forces are not even present?
You argument is flawed.
loss of life is regrettable, innocent people dying in hell-fire missiles and carpet bombing are called collateral damage and is accepted norm in state of war.
An ak 47 weilding thug killing people on station, or a guy blowing himself up in a busy market square or bunch of guys driving a explosive truck in a building in peacetime is considered terrorist.
The most eye catching terror activities have been from the muslim world, hence you get the tag!
A critical study of the drone saga shows that drone strikes occurred only in areas that the Army was absent. If the drone strikes over the last one and a half year are taken into consideration, they ALL occured in NWA. The only remaining area in FATA where the Army is not in control. So my question to you is, how can Pakistan shoot down drones in territories where members of it's armed forces are not even present?
You argument is flawed.
................ So my question to you is, how can Pakistan shoot down drones in territories where members of it's armed forces are not even present?
.....................
A critical study of the drone saga shows that drone strikes occurred only in areas that the Army was absent. If the drone strikes over the last one and a half year are taken into consideration, they ALL occured in NWA. The only remaining area in FATA where the Army is not in control. So my question to you is, how can Pakistan shoot down drones in territories where members of it's armed forces are not even present?
You argument is flawed.
All are names. Ghauri is some Afghan King that defeated Prithvi Raj hence there is a under handed meaning that the Ghauri missile beats Indian Prithvi missile.
Shaheen means Eagle, some Allama Iqbal reference "Tu shaheen hai ..."
I don't know which Taimur is this in reference to.