What's new

Why is our full history not taught to us in Pakistan Studies?

by using bad words?
Do you recommend bullets instead?
A Muslim majority country is not equivalent to an Islamic country. Jinnah and the Muslim League opposed theocracy

Sure, but you can’t separate the two. Islam is inherent in every Pakistani even if they’re not Muslim. Islamic mannerism is spread across the lands. You could still be an Islamic country without the class based faux theocracy. The elites are secularized westerners pigs and the poor use the blasphemy laws left behind by the Colonialism British. What you’re basically saying is we’re another India then? What different is there between a secular Pakistan and Secular India? See where I'm going with this?
 
.
These libtards always hating on Zia. During Zia’s time Pakistan was the fastest growing economy in south asia, the average pakistani made twice as much as average indian. All sectors of economy was booming. No one talks about Zias economic reform which led to pakistans largest economic private sector boom in history. Largest growth of exports and foreign direct invement.

Pakistan was respected on an international stage. Be it US, Europe, or China would roll out red carpet for Zia. His ideology was on the right track.

The deteoration of Pakistan started directly after his passing. From 1990-2001 followed by 2008- today. Pakistan literally lost 30+ years of any form of development be it economic, educational, health, or politics.

Lol, Because US dollars were coming,
Money from Saudi and Arabs also coming..

Musharraf days were best among all.
Computer, Media, Telecommunication and Economy was good.
But same US BUSH gave 4 Billion dollars.
 
.
They is liberals


And Pakistan was made for Islam and Muslims

There was no other point in making Pakistan

Jinnah and the Muslim League were liberals then by your definition.

"but make no mistake....Pakistan is not a theocracy"

ancientpakistan_2896023742469752104.jpg


"in any case Pakistan is not going to be a theocratic state"
ancientpakistan_2896024402284072357.jpg
 
.
These libtards always hating on Zia. During Zia’s time Pakistan was the fastest growing economy in south asia, the average pakistani made twice as much as average indian. All sectors of economy was booming. No one talks about Zias economic reform which led to pakistans largest economic private sector boom in history. Largest growth of exports and foreign direct invement.

Pakistan was respected on an international stage. Be it US, Europe, or China would roll out red carpet for Zia. His ideology was on the right track.

The deteoration of Pakistan started directly after his passing. From 1990-2001 followed by 2008- today. Pakistan literally lost 30+ years of any form of development be it economic, educational, health, or politics.

Militarily there is no comparison. Pakistan was one of the first customers of the F16s. That would be like pakistan getting the F35 in early 2010s…Our missile program was top notch. Infact most of our missile tech since last 1980s habe been frozen in time. Even israel india or US couldnt dare touch our nuclear program due to Zia”s strong will. He literally stared down the soviet empire and won.

That’s because we were being good slaves and fighting the American battle for them. They were giving Pakistan unlimited cash to sustain the war in Afghanistan. The Anglos will sing praises of you when they need something, and when they are done, they’ll discard you. There’s a heavy bit of truth in this.
 
.
Do you recommend bullets instead?

Sure, but you can’t separate the two. Islam is inherent in every Pakistani even if they’re not Muslim. Islamic mannerism is spread across the lands. You could still be an Islamic country without the class based faux theocracy. The elites are secularized westerners pigs and the poor use the blasphemy laws left behind by the Colonialism British. What you’re basically saying is we’re another India then? What different is there between a secular Pakistan and Secular India? See where I'm going with this?

Islamic country and Muslim country are two separate things. You should click links and read stuff. It's good to be educated on these matters.

“Pakistan was made in the name of Islam” is a phrase that we’ve all heard time and time again. People often use it to curtail a debate and stop people from asking more questions. As Joseph Goebbels once famously said, “if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth”.

Let’s put this into perspective shall we – lets assume that Pakistan was indeed “made in the name of Islam”.

Why then were Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, Majlis-e-Ahrar-ul-Islam and Jamaat-e-Islami all opposed to Pakistan?

Why did they refer to Pakistan as “Najistan” and Muhammad Ali Jinnah as “Kafir-e-Azam”?

Have any of our fake nationalists (Al Bakistanis) ever dared to answer this question? Of course not – they do what all other brainwashed sheep do. They simply ignore the obvious.

Islamic country vs Muslim country
Muhammad Ali Jinnah (Quaid-e-Azam) and the Muslim League were Muslim nationalists and not Islamists. There is a big difference between a MUSLIM country and an ISLAMIC country. Many people around the world seem to get the two concepts confused, and I don’t blame them. However, there are clear distinctions:

An Islamic country, or "Islamic Republic", is a nation whereby civil and common laws are based strictly on the Islamic Sharia code, and imposed forcibly on its citizens. All matters relating the economic, religious and cultural matters are handled through an appointed Mullah or an elected council of Mullahs. Personal independence of individuals is significantly curtailed in these countries and consumption and sale of alcohol, idol-worship, western clothing, blasphemy and apostasy would be considered illegal. Such countries that mimic this concept include Saudi Arabia and Iran.

A Muslim country is a nation whereby civil and common laws are based loosely on Islamic values and principles - hence Sharia is not imposed forcibly on its citizens. Modern democratic values are promoted and entertained in matters concerning economic, religious and cultural matters while personal independence of individuals is respected. Such countries that mimic this concept include Turkey and Malaysia.

FB_IMG_1682014059639.jpg
 
.
Jinnah and the Muslim League were liberals then by your definition.

"but make no mistake....Pakistan is not a theocracy"

View attachment 925530

"in any case Pakistan is not going to be a theocratic state"
View attachment 925531


Look Pakistan was and is a Islamic Republic made in the name of Islam, so Muslims can freely practice Islam and Jinnah and others for saw the oppression Indian Muslims would face
 
.
Look Pakistan was and is a Islamic Republic made in the name of Islam, so Muslims can freely practice Islam and Jinnah and others for saw the oppression Indian Muslims would face

No evidence whatsoever to suggest that nonsense. I've asked you twice now why all the Islamic parties opposed Pakistan's independence and you don't even answer that.

Show me evidence of Jinnah stating he wanted Pakistan to be an Islamic state.
 
.
We need to retilt Pakistani ideology. This begins with complete ownership of our history. Seperation of state and religion. Going back to a secular republic. Dethroning influential molvis. Disbanding madrassahs. Full attaturk. Ban headscarfs and non Pakistani attire which includes headscarves and niqabs.

And integrate faith into the state, God is with Pakistan the collective, the state and not just Pakistani Muslims.

Then logic, reason and hunger for progress will take over and the Jinnah archetype will become the majority and we will rise, become 1st world developed, leader of men, noble and respected.

Other civilizations will copy our culture, our language, our dress, associate with our history. We shall mog India into absolute oblivion.
 
Last edited:
.
Oh yeah we have an identity crisis bhencho*d pajeet where not one Pakistani has ever claimed identity different from our own, unlike you subhuman ugly vermins claiming a homogeneous “Indian” identity that Muslim conquerors somehow destroyed.

Stupid fu*ken Indian gandoo. Ma di Ku*s kutay haramzaday
They teach manner and etiquette in schools and home but is lost in translation.
 
.
Look Pakistan was and is a Islamic Republic made in the name of Islam, so Muslims can freely practice Islam and Jinnah and others for saw the oppression Indian Muslims would face

Islamic Republic :cheesy::cheesy::cheesy:

1st, Pakistan is not Islamic,
2nd, And it is not even Republic.

It may be a "Army State".

Republic.PNG


If you look at Pakistan`s current situation, you can know better.
People are with Imran Khan,
Govt is of PDM, selected by Army.
How is Pakistan even Republic?
 
. .
21 out of the 75 members of the National Assembly opposed the contents of the Objectives Resolution.

A framework upon your constitution should pass unanimously with all members agreeing to it.

A simple majority suffices in democracy.
Minorities also supported Muslim league and Jinnah,
So, they were in govt in Pakistan, Jinnah days,

Qadiyanis (Mirzaye) also supported Pakistan,
Zafarullah Khan was Mirzaye and Jinnah know it and he made him Foreign Minister.

Jinnah was secular and wanted secular state.
But unluckily Pakistan Hijacked by selfish dictators.

Zia used more poison, 40 years Passed, but Pakistan still sinking in terrorism.
Minorities still make the government.
 
.
No evidence whatsoever to suggest that nonsense. I've asked you twice now why all the Islamic parties opposed Pakistan's independence and you don't even answer that.

Show me evidence of Jinnah stating he wanted Pakistan to be an Islamic state.

Because they were idiots

Look at the state of Indian Muslims today, Pakistan was essential for us, but it is fundamentally a state made for the practice of Islam

One of two states made in the name of religion the other being Israel
 
.

Why is our full history not taught to us in Pakistan Studies?​


Another reason may be PPP ruled long in Pakistan
1. Bhutto
2. Benazir
3. Zardari
4. Bilawal (Still PPP is in Govt and has some influence)

If we look at Mujeeb ur Rehman speeches, he seems interested in [West] Pakistan, On other hand if we look speeches of Bhutto, He was not want Eat Pakistan (Bangladesh). He even used bad and racism words towards East Pakistan. Yahya supported him, he can kick Bhutto, but he not. In the end Bhutto rued West Pakistan, Yahya was expatriated (according to Pak Study). But in reality majority of generals lived outside of Pakistan, examples are Musharraf, Bajwa, etc

Minorities still make the government.

Mirzaye can?
Even killed like Shehbaz Bhati.

In Jannah days our FM was even Mirzaye.
Ministery of Minorty Affairs? Lol
Not even a little influential posts.
 
Last edited:
.
Abdul, says the strictly inferiority complex small dick energy Pajeet with shit stained fingertips typing while having a cold glass of cow cola.

I enjoyed hearing the news of 5 roasted Pajeets today. Great news! Smelled like beef brisket straight out of Texas I bet. You should probably go do Pooja or something, dothead motherfu*ker
Why are you still angry buddy. I thought your name is of middle Eastern origin. If it isn’t Abdul, then good for you.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom