What's new

Why is KSA hosting Pak, Turk and Egypt leaders in same week?

no expectations from studies specially.. at one side thy r offering airspace to israil against Iran .. and involve oil games and much more ... in American interests .. on the other hand Egypt turned around most likely controversial regarding Palestine . Pakistan is bizy incouter terrorism ... c what's heppns
 
.
at one side thy r offering airspace to israil against Iran

Why is Israel not taking the opportunity?

involve oil games and much more ... in American interests
This you should explain further!

Egypt turned around most likely controversial regarding Palestine
Turn around?
Pakistan is bizy incouter terrorism
Pakistan is busy in politics, only army is busy in counter terrorism

If Iran goes nuclear and Saudi, Turkey & Egypt follow suit, that will create a long term balance of power.

Iran is irresponsible state... running terror organizations almost in every Islamic country, using its proxies, which it nurtured since revolution.
 
.
You are right. Right now, there is 'NO' politics going on in Iran, and there has been none for a long time now.

They need to learn how to do politics. All they do is threatening left and right with nonsense, I don't even know why they do that..

I'd understand it if it were Israel or Russia, as such statements obviously work for their domestic politics just before the elections..

But Iran is like this 'ALWAYS', even though there is not really a real political atmosphere in the country in the first place.

So, either there is 'ALWAYS' general elections in Iran, which is not the case as the case is mostly the opposite, or Iran really doesn't know how to do politics.


They need mature and real politicians, and 'THEN' Iran would be able to be taken seriously in political scene.
imo, it's basically drugging their own population with so-called external threats in order to increase the firm grip of the mullahs. Before I joined this forum I had a neutral image of Iran as you almost never read or hear about Iran in Turkish media/news. However, I quickly learned from the majority of Iranians here that they have negative obsession with us while Turks don't give a rats *** about Iran nor the mullahs. I still believe the average Iranian on the street is saner than what we get to see on this forum though, at least that's what i hope.

OT: I don't think it's something related to Iran as some people wrote. I place my bets on regional cooperation against isis, trade, yemen, maybe Egypt's decision on branding Hamas a terrorist organization etc.
 
.
"Namak Nashnas"
You don’t recognise my salt i.e. we're ungrateful.

You're dealing with the Nawaz administration who are very pro-Saudi bro. Wait till it goes back to the Bhuttos and it is pro-Iran again. It's politics, not recognising whether someone is grateful or not.
Sorry bro. You are right.
PS. People like Nawaz, and Zarvan are always on my nerves and make me flip. ;)
 
.
Backbiting.jpg

We are cuter than the rest! :)
 
. . .
??
The worlds' largest producer and market supplier of the Chinook salmon is New Zealand. Marketed as king salmon, in 2009, New Zealand exported 5,088 tonnes of salmon equating to a value of NZ$61 million in export earnings.

Sad to say most of the salmon in NZ is now farmed wild salmon populations have been badly affected by the loss of water from rivers to the dairy industry. You wont catch any thing like that in NZ, its a shot from Kenai in Alaska. :(

On topic seeing the Tekrit attack is being backed by Iranian artillery and commanded by the Quds force i can see a very good reason for the meeting.
 
.
Turks are expecting major strategic realignment in the region.


hakan fidan umre 01 mart 2015.jpg



Hakan Fidan the ex-head of Milli Istihbarat Teskilati (MIT = national intelligence) was also in Saudi Arabia. Hakan Fidan in purple shirt. This is not good for Sisi. For Erdogan, Hakan Fidan is probably more important to him than Prime Minister Ahmed Davudoglu. Erdogan would probably adopt Hakan Fidan if he could. The two are that close. It is reported that Erdogan sent Hakan Fidan to Egypt to warn Morsi of the coming coup. Everyone knows how Erdogan feels in regards to Morsi. People bring out their finest china for their most important guests. That is what Hakan Fidan is. The very best of the Turkish State. His presence in Saudi Arabia means something major is happening.

Erdogan is a "dava adami". He is fighting for a cause. Erdogans relations with King Abdullah became hostile cos the Sauds supported the coup on Morsi. The price for normalization of relations is Sisi. Erdogan as a Turk as a Hanafi as a Maturidi as a Nakshibandi is also not happy with the ideology of the Sauds. Relations deteriorated till King Abdullah was hospitalized and Prince Salman ran the country. Then Erdogan sent Turkish warships for port calls in Saudi Arabia. Erdogan went to the funeral of King Abdullah and ordered Turkish flags at half-mast for the man that couped Morsi and supported Sisi. Erdogan goes to Saudi Arabia for talks. Hakan Fidan is there.

There is no way Erdogan would do any of these things unless King Salman accepted his terms for normalisation of relations.

Saudi Arabias strategic realignment was predicted in 2013. Those interested let us know so it is posted.


You're dealing with the Nawaz administration who are very pro-Saudi bro. Wait till it goes back to the Bhuttos and it is pro-Iran again. It's politics, not recognising whether someone is grateful or not.

It is possible Nawaz Sharif is part of the strategic realignment in the region. Turkish Prime Minister Ahmed Davudoglu was in Pakistan with Nawaz Sharif in february signing major agreements. It is possible this meeting in march was discussed. Otherwise Salman meeting Sisi, Erdogan, Sharif in three days dont make sense. Time will tell.


Actually in three days.
Sunday - Al sissi
Monday - Rajab Tayyab Erdoaan
Tuesday - Nawaz Sharif

What Salman probably said to the respective leaders.
Sisi: I want a divorce. You can still use the mansion and see each other on weekends but dont let Erdogan see.
Erdogan: I want to join the Turkish-Qatar team. Military alliance? Umm.. with Sharif on the list thought it was a cricket team.
Sharif: Erdogan and Qatars Tamim are creating a cricket team. Interested? Turks are bringing Tandoor Kofta. Turkish-Qatar armies outside? Cheerleaders.

@chauvunist @salarsikander @Tameem @Hashshāshīn @Zarvan
@Mosamania @monitor @Al-zakir @Luffy 500 @OTTOMAN
 
.
Turks are expecting major strategic realignment in the region.


View attachment 198812


Hakan Fidan the ex-head of Milli Istihbarat Teskilati (MIT = national intelligence) was also in Saudi Arabia. Hakan Fidan in purple shirt. This is not good for Sisi. For Erdogan, Hakan Fidan is probably more important to him than Prime Minister Ahmed Davudoglu. Erdogan would probably adopt Hakan Fidan if he could. The two are that close. It is reported that Erdogan sent Hakan Fidan to Egypt to warn Morsi of the coming coup. Everyone knows how Erdogan feels in regards to Morsi. People bring out their finest china for their most important guests. That is what Hakan Fidan is. The very best of the Turkish State. His presence in Saudi Arabia means something major is happening.

Erdogan is a "dava adami". He is fighting for a cause. Erdogans relations with King Abdullah became hostile cos the Sauds supported the coup on Morsi. The price for normalization of relations is Sisi. Erdogan as a Turk as a Hanafi as a Maturidi as a Nakshibandi is also not happy with the ideology of the Sauds. Relations deteriorated till King Abdullah was hospitalized and Prince Salman ran the country. Then Erdogan sent Turkish warships for port calls in Saudi Arabia. Erdogan went to the funeral of King Abdullah and ordered Turkish flags at half-mast for the man that couped Morsi and supported Sisi. Erdogan goes to Saudi Arabia for talks. Hakan Fidan is there.

There is no way Erdogan would do any of these things unless King Salman accepted his terms for normalisation of relations.

Saudi Arabias strategic realignment was predicted in 2013. Those interested let us know so it is posted.




It is possible Nawaz Sharif is part of the strategic realignment in the region. Turkish Prime Minister Ahmed Davudoglu was in Pakistan with Nawaz Sharif in february signing major agreements. It is possible this meeting in march was discussed. Otherwise Salman meeting Sisi, Erdogan, Sharif in three days dont make sense. Time will tell.




What Salman probably said to the respective leaders.
Sisi: I want a divorce. You can still use the mansion and see each other on weekends but dont let Erdogan see.
Erdogan: I want to join the Turkish-Qatar team. Military alliance? Umm.. with Sharif on the list thought it was a cricket team.
Sharif: Erdogan and Qatars Tamim are creating a cricket team. Interested? Turks are bringing Tandoor Kofta. Turkish-Qatar armies outside? Cheerleaders.

@chauvunist @salarsikander @Tameem @Hashshāshīn @Zarvan
@Mosamania @monitor @Al-zakir @Luffy 500 @OTTOMAN
Hakan Fidan also being there is actually a huge news.
 
.
Kerry visits Riyadh to sooth fears of stronger Iran under nuclear deal| Reuters

Kerry visits Riyadh to sooth fears of stronger Iran under nuclear deal
By Arshad Mohammed and Angus McDowall

MONTREAUX, Switzerland/RIYADH Tue Mar 3, 2015 3:55am EST

r

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry gestures during a news conference after he delivered remarks to the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva March 2, 2015.

Credit: Reuters/Evan Vucci/Pool




(Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry flies to Riyadh this week to reassure King Salman that any nuclear deal with Iran is in Saudi Arabia's interest, despite the country's fears it may boost its rival's support for Shi'ite Muslim interests in the region.

Convincing Saudi Arabia to accept any agreed nuclear deal is important to President Barack Obama because he needs Riyadh to work closely with Washington on a host of regional policies and to maintain its role as a moderating influence in oil markets.

The main critics of the U.S. push for a nuclear deal are Israel and congressional Republicans. But Saudi Arabia is skeptical too that any agreement would only let Iran devote more cash and energy to Shi'ite proxies in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen, escalating conflicts.

"The Saudis fear Obama will give the Iranians a deal whatever the cost because it is important for his legacy, and that Iran will get a certain regional status in exchange for an agreement," said a diplomat in the Gulf.

Kerry met Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in Montreux, Switzerland, on Monday at the start of up to three days of negotiations to try to meet a self-imposed deadline to achieve a framework agreement by the end of March.

He will then brief Saudi Arabia's new king on the talks, and meet other senior Gulf officials later in the week, in an attempt to convince them that a diplomatic solution to the long-festering crisis over Iran's atomic program is in that country's interest too.

Saudi's anxiety about an agreement has fueled a flurry of diplomacy in recent days to bolster unity among Sunni states in the Middle East in the face of shared threats including Iran, analysts say.

Washington shares Arab concerns about Iran's role, particularly in Syria and Yemen and through its ties to Lebanon's Hezbollah militia, a senior Obama administration official said, on condition of anonymity, but added that there was a "very substantial" U.S. military commitment to Gulf allies.

"What we need to do is have the appropriate strategies to counter any provocative and destabilizing behavior... it's going to depend on what can we do effectively in places like Syria and Yemen," he said.

ANXIOUS

U.S. officials are unwilling however to outline what strategies might curb Iran's regional influence, and Washington's record in Iraq, Syria and Yemen - where armed Iranian allies have since flourished - has caused Saudi Arabia great anxiety.

The country's trust in Washington during the Iran talks is also still recovering from the sudden move in late 2013 towards a nuclear deal, when Saudi officials were blindsided by the revelation of months of secret talks between the U.S. and Iran.

"They are very, very nervous about the way we are moving forward," said a Western diplomat who tracks the issue closely and said Riyadh feared a "lose-lose situation" in which Iran either gained an atomic weapon or was freed from sanctions.

Riyadh has long been worried about Iran gaining nuclear weapons capability, something that once led King Abdullah to ask Washington to "cut off the head of the snake" by striking Iran, diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks showed.

But it now sees Iran's involvement in Arab countries, particularly its backing of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, its support for Iraqi Shi'ite militias and its ties to the Houthi group that has seized control in northern Yemen, as a more urgent problem.

A senior State Department official told Reuters: "Secretary Kerry will make clear we understand the concerns they have about the region's security, concerns that we also share."

Meanwhile, King Salman is working to forge a united front among Sunni states against what Riyadh sees as the dual threat from Iran and IS, analysts say.

Over the past week Salman has met the leaders of all Saudi Arabia's Gulf Arab neighbors, the king of Jordan and the presidents of Egypt and Turkey, the two most populous and militarily powerful Sunni states in the region.

"The understanding is we will face a more aggressive Iran if they sign an agreement. All the restrictions on it will be lifted and it will be much stronger. This is an issue that needs some sort of unity," said Mustafa Alani, an Iraqi security analyst with ties to the kingdom's Interior Ministry.

(Additional reporting by William Maclean in Dubai; Editing by Sophie Walker)
 
. .
Kerry visits Riyadh to sooth fears of stronger Iran under nuclear deal| Reuters

Kerry visits Riyadh to sooth fears of stronger Iran under nuclear deal
By Arshad Mohammed and Angus McDowall

MONTREAUX, Switzerland/RIYADH Tue Mar 3, 2015 3:55am EST

r

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry gestures during a news conference after he delivered remarks to the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva March 2, 2015.

Credit: Reuters/Evan Vucci/Pool




(Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry flies to Riyadh this week to reassure King Salman that any nuclear deal with Iran is in Saudi Arabia's interest, despite the country's fears it may boost its rival's support for Shi'ite Muslim interests in the region.

Convincing Saudi Arabia to accept any agreed nuclear deal is important to President Barack Obama because he needs Riyadh to work closely with Washington on a host of regional policies and to maintain its role as a moderating influence in oil markets.

The main critics of the U.S. push for a nuclear deal are Israel and congressional Republicans. But Saudi Arabia is skeptical too that any agreement would only let Iran devote more cash and energy to Shi'ite proxies in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen, escalating conflicts.

"The Saudis fear Obama will give the Iranians a deal whatever the cost because it is important for his legacy, and that Iran will get a certain regional status in exchange for an agreement," said a diplomat in the Gulf.

Kerry met Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in Montreux, Switzerland, on Monday at the start of up to three days of negotiations to try to meet a self-imposed deadline to achieve a framework agreement by the end of March.

He will then brief Saudi Arabia's new king on the talks, and meet other senior Gulf officials later in the week, in an attempt to convince them that a diplomatic solution to the long-festering crisis over Iran's atomic program is in that country's interest too.

Saudi's anxiety about an agreement has fueled a flurry of diplomacy in recent days to bolster unity among Sunni states in the Middle East in the face of shared threats including Iran, analysts say.

Washington shares Arab concerns about Iran's role, particularly in Syria and Yemen and through its ties to Lebanon's Hezbollah militia, a senior Obama administration official said, on condition of anonymity, but added that there was a "very substantial" U.S. military commitment to Gulf allies.

"What we need to do is have the appropriate strategies to counter any provocative and destabilizing behavior... it's going to depend on what can we do effectively in places like Syria and Yemen," he said.

ANXIOUS

U.S. officials are unwilling however to outline what strategies might curb Iran's regional influence, and Washington's record in Iraq, Syria and Yemen - where armed Iranian allies have since flourished - has caused Saudi Arabia great anxiety.

The country's trust in Washington during the Iran talks is also still recovering from the sudden move in late 2013 towards a nuclear deal, when Saudi officials were blindsided by the revelation of months of secret talks between the U.S. and Iran.

"They are very, very nervous about the way we are moving forward," said a Western diplomat who tracks the issue closely and said Riyadh feared a "lose-lose situation" in which Iran either gained an atomic weapon or was freed from sanctions.

Riyadh has long been worried about Iran gaining nuclear weapons capability, something that once led King Abdullah to ask Washington to "cut off the head of the snake" by striking Iran, diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks showed.

But it now sees Iran's involvement in Arab countries, particularly its backing of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, its support for Iraqi Shi'ite militias and its ties to the Houthi group that has seized control in northern Yemen, as a more urgent problem.

A senior State Department official told Reuters: "Secretary Kerry will make clear we understand the concerns they have about the region's security, concerns that we also share."

Meanwhile, King Salman is working to forge a united front among Sunni states against what Riyadh sees as the dual threat from Iran and IS, analysts say.

Over the past week Salman has met the leaders of all Saudi Arabia's Gulf Arab neighbors, the king of Jordan and the presidents of Egypt and Turkey, the two most populous and militarily powerful Sunni states in the region.

"The understanding is we will face a more aggressive Iran if they sign an agreement. All the restrictions on it will be lifted and it will be much stronger. This is an issue that needs some sort of unity," said Mustafa Alani, an Iraqi security analyst with ties to the kingdom's Interior Ministry.

(Additional reporting by William Maclean in Dubai; Editing by Sophie Walker)
I can understand KSA's concern with Iran. Perhaps a conspiracy theory, but i dont think the US and Israel want to be done with Iran through a total war, because when Iran falls there will only be 2 main factions left in the ME; Israel and the sunnis. This situation probably might end up with more pressure for Israel while a balance between sunnis and shia gives Israel more space and room since GCC are distracted by their main worry Iran. So Israel only wants to set Iran back through limited war, but the US under Obama doesnt even want that.
 
.
Kerry visits Riyadh to sooth fears of stronger Iran under nuclear deal| Reuters

Kerry visits Riyadh to sooth fears of stronger Iran under nuclear deal
By Arshad Mohammed and Angus McDowall

MONTREAUX, Switzerland/RIYADH Tue Mar 3, 2015 3:55am EST

r

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry gestures during a news conference after he delivered remarks to the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva March 2, 2015.

Credit: Reuters/Evan Vucci/Pool




(Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry flies to Riyadh this week to reassure King Salman that any nuclear deal with Iran is in Saudi Arabia's interest, despite the country's fears it may boost its rival's support for Shi'ite Muslim interests in the region.

Convincing Saudi Arabia to accept any agreed nuclear deal is important to President Barack Obama because he needs Riyadh to work closely with Washington on a host of regional policies and to maintain its role as a moderating influence in oil markets.

The main critics of the U.S. push for a nuclear deal are Israel and congressional Republicans. But Saudi Arabia is skeptical too that any agreement would only let Iran devote more cash and energy to Shi'ite proxies in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen, escalating conflicts.

"The Saudis fear Obama will give the Iranians a deal whatever the cost because it is important for his legacy, and that Iran will get a certain regional status in exchange for an agreement," said a diplomat in the Gulf.

Kerry met Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in Montreux, Switzerland, on Monday at the start of up to three days of negotiations to try to meet a self-imposed deadline to achieve a framework agreement by the end of March.

He will then brief Saudi Arabia's new king on the talks, and meet other senior Gulf officials later in the week, in an attempt to convince them that a diplomatic solution to the long-festering crisis over Iran's atomic program is in that country's interest too.

Saudi's anxiety about an agreement has fueled a flurry of diplomacy in recent days to bolster unity among Sunni states in the Middle East in the face of shared threats including Iran, analysts say.

Washington shares Arab concerns about Iran's role, particularly in Syria and Yemen and through its ties to Lebanon's Hezbollah militia, a senior Obama administration official said, on condition of anonymity, but added that there was a "very substantial" U.S. military commitment to Gulf allies.

"What we need to do is have the appropriate strategies to counter any provocative and destabilizing behavior... it's going to depend on what can we do effectively in places like Syria and Yemen," he said.

ANXIOUS

U.S. officials are unwilling however to outline what strategies might curb Iran's regional influence, and Washington's record in Iraq, Syria and Yemen - where armed Iranian allies have since flourished - has caused Saudi Arabia great anxiety.

The country's trust in Washington during the Iran talks is also still recovering from the sudden move in late 2013 towards a nuclear deal, when Saudi officials were blindsided by the revelation of months of secret talks between the U.S. and Iran.

"They are very, very nervous about the way we are moving forward," said a Western diplomat who tracks the issue closely and said Riyadh feared a "lose-lose situation" in which Iran either gained an atomic weapon or was freed from sanctions.

Riyadh has long been worried about Iran gaining nuclear weapons capability, something that once led King Abdullah to ask Washington to "cut off the head of the snake" by striking Iran, diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks showed.

But it now sees Iran's involvement in Arab countries, particularly its backing of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, its support for Iraqi Shi'ite militias and its ties to the Houthi group that has seized control in northern Yemen, as a more urgent problem.

A senior State Department official told Reuters: "Secretary Kerry will make clear we understand the concerns they have about the region's security, concerns that we also share."

Meanwhile, King Salman is working to forge a united front among Sunni states against what Riyadh sees as the dual threat from Iran and IS, analysts say.

Over the past week Salman has met the leaders of all Saudi Arabia's Gulf Arab neighbors, the king of Jordan and the presidents of Egypt and Turkey, the two most populous and militarily powerful Sunni states in the region.

"The understanding is we will face a more aggressive Iran if they sign an agreement. All the restrictions on it will be lifted and it will be much stronger. This is an issue that needs some sort of unity," said Mustafa Alani, an Iraqi security analyst with ties to the kingdom's Interior Ministry.

(Additional reporting by William Maclean in Dubai; Editing by Sophie Walker)

The nuclear program is just a smokes screen and in reality that is not what the Saudis care about. What they care about is to maintain the status quo hostility between Iran and the West because in such a dynamic it keeps Iran economically and politically isolated from the region.

So therefore ANY deal would be considered nightmare deal for the Saudis, because the sanctions regime would be lifted. And Iran would get significantly stronger economically, given it is a 80 million well educated population that will draw a lot investment and would trade with the rest of the world.
Saudis want no deal at all. Even if Iran offered to forego its right to peaceful nuclear energy, and offered to dismatle the nuclear program in its entirety, that would be just as bad deal for the Saudis.
 
Last edited:
.
pakistan should stay away from anything that even relates to harming iran the last thing we need is another destabalized country on our western border
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom