Ilay
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2016
- Messages
- 195
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
I'm also stating facts, yet to see you show me wrong.
All you can come with are personal attacks.
It was not a joint-effort on every level, on the political and military level each state had its own ambitions.
These 4 Arab regimes mainly involved in the wars; Egypt, Syria, Iraq and Jordan. All of them had their own ideology and visions for the Arab world which threatened each other. These disputes continued after the wars with Israel, Nasser ruling the united arab republic (Syria&Egypt today) wanted to take over Jordan, Iraq stood against this.
Jordan warned Israel ahead of the 1973 attack.
Syria did not trust Iraq's forces stationed around Damascus.
If you look at other wars where many states take part of there is always a leader of the coalition, the strongest state. It has been the United States for many of those coalitions. Amongst Syria, Iraq and Egypt all 3 wanted to be that leader, leader of the Arabs.. Syria and Egypt became 1 state under Nasser as the United Arab Republic, that left them and Iraq competing. And Jordan had its own side as a monarchy.
Those are some errors not including the military issues.
I see, thanks for the answer though one can wonder - had Israel not come to exist would the Arab nations live peacefully or be at each other's necks: Arab republic vs. monarchy vs caliphate and Hashemite kingdom vs Saudi kingdom or Sunni caliphate vs Shia caliphate.