The BrOkEn HeArT
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
- Messages
- 3,053
- Reaction score
- -63
- Country
- Location
Ya , I accept. Only Muslims are same as they were in 6th century, you cave man."House of many civlizations". Good summary. Paks are also decendants of "many peoples" one strand was what you might call proto-Hindus because Hinduism as it exists today is relatively new concept.
But bear in mind there never as no such thing as "Hindu" people but a polyglot of peoples with similar belief systems. So a proto- Hindu from Charsadda in 200CE was entirely differant person to a proto-Hindu from Chennai in 200CE.
Thinking they were same is like assuming a Ethopian Christian from 500CE was exactly same as Christian from Rome in 500CE. They were entirely differant peoples but with some shared aspects of their belief system.
I would add that the Arabic/Semite component in Pak population is very, very low with some presence in Sindh/Mekran coast. Rest of the population is effectively native evolved and is product of the vortex of genetic mixture that has played out in the Indus rgion over the last 10,000 years.
And when I say "native" I don't mean it is same as rest of South Asia. Differant mixtures have played out in differant regions of South Asia and produced local variations that are unique to each region but also share common roots.
This is similiar to other parts of the world. Japanese, Filipinos, Indonesians, Malays have similarities but at the same time there are differances. Same in Europe where there is gradual change from the north (Norway) to south (Greece) or south west (Spain).
Therefore it is important we recognize differances but at the same time accept the similarities.
Other are progressive.