Why indians are more successful than Chinese in US-Ecplains a chinese

[Leishangthem]

The masses do not raise up a civilization. The super geniuses and freaks do.
I am top 2% in intelligence according to testing. Woopie. top 2%, 5% 10% not much difference. Thus 1 in 50, 20, 10 so hundreds of millions like my intelligence level. It is those one in a million or unique people who change the world. Those people can be anywhere. Indian and China have some so will Pakistan. Africa has them too. Nations that are on the ball try to find those freaks and steal them away. Crap nations run by r-tards, fools or thugs are usually too arrogant or stupid to put resources into helping those big super brains lift them up.

Stealing away super intelligent Indians is India's loss and America's gain.

It's the inert character of the masses that raise civilization, civilization is shaped by inherent genetic traits of the populace and the culture they devise, the culture is the byproduct of the inherent character of the populace.

India have 1.1 billion population,do you think US took all your"intelligent Indians" for India to be rendered in such a tragical state?
.All country have some intelligent people , but some country has a lot more of them. Also the so called genius can be very different ,they are not the same in quality or effectiveness.
The temperament,eastern sphere values, perceptions and their superior training institutions makes east asians much more valuable asset that south Asians like Indians

There are lots of intelligent dog ,but you can't seriously compare a german shepherd to a border collie,they have inherent different lvl of aptitude,temperament, and perception of things. Humans are also like that .


For Indians ,being a ceo of a western firm is achievement grandeur.American-Indian are mostly comprised of STEM graduates from India's best uni,with H1B1 visa yet your Intelligent Indians don't create globally dominant and revolutionary firms like youtube ,zoom,nvidia,yahoo for the US like chinese does ,they are mostly in management or support staff, riding the coattails of established institutions, more like a leech to the gains of other civilizations.

IQ is directly proportional to the developmental curve of a nation.

Crap nations run by r-tards, fools or thugs are usually too arrogant or stupid to put resources into helping those big super brains lift them up.

The leaders are a direct representation of the inherent nature,mental aptitute and character of a nation's civilians.
Someone like Trump/MODI/Bolsonaro would've never been allowed to be leaders by Japanese or Korean citizens.
Trump reflects the character of Americans like Modi does for indians,same as any local warlords of some African province.

The greatest asset of any nation is not oil,geography,gold,rare earth or any other natural resources.It's
the human resource,and it's the stock of human resource that shape their culture which churns a civilization that in
the end formed into a state.

There's two generalized civilization that managed to develop in the human history,and honestly it will be only these two that will be labeled developed for unforeseeable future
;One, the european civilization;two,the East Asian Civilization.
But only the east asians carry the inherent ability to built a state from ground zero to the zenith of human civilization through seer ingenuity, perseverance,toil . Even the European civilization developed on the back of the loots and slave work they managed through their colonial conquest,without the loot & plunder,the europea that we see today would have ceased to exist.

If Human civilization was a game,
South Asians are like C ranked characters in it,East asians are S and europeans A.

It's also evident in the IQ ranking,all the developed nations has really high IQ ranking,east asia occupies top 5 . IQ ranking is directly proportional to the developmental curve of a nation.

Unless the developed nations come together and funds the development of the underdeveloped ones in south asia and africa things are unlikely to change even in many many centuries.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

The masses do not raise up a civilization. The super geniuses and freaks do.
I am top 2% in intelligence according to testing. Woopie. top 2%, 5% 10% not much difference. Thus 1 in 50, 20, 10 so hundreds of millions like my intelligence level. It is those one in a million or unique people who change the world. Those people can be anywhere. Indian and China have some so will Pakistan. Africa has them too. Nations that are on the ball try to find those freaks and steal them away. Crap nations run by r-tards, fools or thugs are usually too arrogant or stupid to put resources into helping those big super brains lift them up.

Stealing away super intelligent Indians is India's loss and America's gain.

You are simplifying the facts too much. Far too much. Why is it that the White and Far Eastern races are responsible for all the major scientific and technological inventions and have the best industries, infrastructures and are the most advanced civilisations on earth? Why are all the other races not able to compete in these endeavours by themselves? Something doesn't add up.

It's the inert character of the masses that raise civilization, civilization is shaped by inherent genetic traits of the populace and the culture they devise, the culture is the byproduct of the inherent character of the populace.

India have 1.1 billion population,do you think US took all your"intelligent Indians" for India to be rendered in such a tragical state?
.All country have some intelligent people , but some country has a lot more of them. Also the so called genius can be very different ,they are not the same in quality or effectiveness.
The temperament,eastern sphere values, perceptions and their superior training institutions makes east asians much more valuable asset that south Asians .

There are lots of intelligent dog ,but you can't seriously compare a german shepherd to a border collie,they have inherent different lvl of aptitude,temperament, and perception of things. Humans are also like that .


For Indians ,being a ceo of a western firm is achievement grandeur.American-Indian are mostly comprised of STEM graduates from India's best uni,with H1B1 visa yet your Intelligent Indians don't create globally dominant and revolutionary firms like youtube ,zoom,nvidia,yahoo for the US like chinese does ,they are mostly in management or support staff, riding the coattails of established institutions, more like a leech to the gains of other civilizations.

IQ is directly proportional to the developmental curve of a nation.

The leaders are a direct representation of the inherent nature,mental aptitute and character of a nation's civilians.
Someone like Trump/MODI/Bolsonaro would've never been allowed to be leaders by Japanese or Korean citizens.
Trump reflects the character of Americans like Modi does for indians,same as any local warlords of some African province.

india's population is actually well over 1.3 billion. It may IN FACT be over 1.4 billion:

https://countrymeters.info/en/India

India Population (2024) - Worldometer

Population of India: current, historical, and projected population, growth rate, immigration, median age, total fertility rate (TFR), population density, urbanization, urban population, country's share of world population, and global rank. Data tables, maps, charts, and live population clock

www.worldometers.info

 

[fallstuff]

Language is an advantage for the Indians over the Chinese.

 

[kankan326]

The average iq of an indian is 82 whereas for a Chinese person it is 105. So on average, a Chinese person has a 23 IQ point advantage over an indian. That is virtually impossible to bridge or overcome. It also tells you why the indians have NEVER EVER invented ANY advanced sciences or technologies and why indians are so racially inferior to Chinese people:

IQ by Country - World Ranking of Countries by their Average IQ

What to know what country has the highest average IQ? â What is the average IQ of your country? â Full list of countries by their average IQ - more than 180 countries! â â Find answers about IQ by country here! â¦

new-iq-test.com

I said "EQ"(Emotional Quotient). Not "IQ". Chinese are not good at communication compared with Indians. Indians are easier to get along with.

 

[AViet]

This is true for each and every country and not only US.

On average, Fillipino is more successful in the US than German and Japanese diasporas.

Such selective comparison does not make sense.

For a meaningful comparison, the diasporas must come from the similar background/class in their native countries, have similar population and living for same time in their host countries. In addition, they must enjoy similar treatment from the host country's government and receive similar perception and treatment from general population. Not to mention the barriers of language/cultural/former colonial connection

Even Japanese (and perhaps Jews), being oppressed in South America in early 20th century, could not flourish compared to white (South European) and Arab communities.

British people, having India continent as their biggest jewel of former colonies, can accept a British of Pakistani or Indian or West Indies/African descent to become the London mayor or a cabinet minister, but may never accept a British of Japanese/Korean or Chinese descent for those positions.

 

[KurtisBrian]

I said "EQ"(Emotional Quotient). Not "IQ". Chinese are not good at communication compared with Indians. Indians are easier to get along with.

Is it more likely people become CEO because they are friendly or because they are a member of a financial "gang" aka an evil cabal?
Chinese work. If you promote the worker you have nobody to do the work.
Indians don't work and also don't create. Just look at India. Those lazy lifeless liars and thieves are still living in the buildings the British made. That is why in Star Wars they (along with Indonesians) are depicted as the Jawa parasites. C3PO "I can't abide those Jawas. Disgusting creatures."
So what do the parasites do? they move to the lands of others to live off of them. Indians, amongst others, also still have black magic and drugs which they use to subvert and enslave.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Chinese American have long history of persecution in USA unlike Indian Americans

In the colonial era they were kicked around like dogs, a convenient docile punch bag for Americans

In the segregation era, Chinese Americans were not allowed to have same privileges as white Americans

This led ghettoization of their community and creating local crime groups like Triads

These Triads primarily smuggled their fellow country men like cattle-

The one's who survived ended up being dishwashers and massage parlour staff in China towns

The triads also immensely benefited from a swarm of Chinese crawling on their bellies to USA in order escape Great Leaps and cultural revolution in their Mao land





Being a son/daughter of Triad criminal/massage parlour whore the social mobility of American Chinese makes them eligible to be only overseas wumao for CPC


I am sure many Indian posters have seen plenty of examples of Chinese-American posters' s behavior here which points to the above

Indian Americans on the other hand started migrating primarily during the IT boom of 2000s, best period in US history for Immigrants

The Indian submissive head bobble is actually a highly valued and tradeable commodity on FTSE100.

Good thing Pakistani Americans have understood the value in this and didn't end up unlike their Rotterdam counterparts

 

[CHN Bamboo]

What a boring topic. Do all Indians dream of emigrating to the United States or other rich country? Don't you have your own country?

 

[S10]

This is true for each and every country and not only US.

All that talent and you still can't build toilets for nearly half your population back home.

 

[nahtanbob]

On average, Fillipino is more successful in the US than German and Japanese diasporas.

The most successful group in USA is German-Americans. There is no way Filipono is more successful than German-American

I said "EQ"(Emotional Quotient). Not "IQ". Chinese are not good at communication compared with Indians. Indians are easier to get along with.

I think current wave of Chinese immigrants are good at EQ and EI (emotional intelligence). That is my perception.

 

[rott]

Indian Americans are far more successful than Chinese Americans.

Chinese Americans =/= Chinese. Just like Singaporeans are not Chinese.

I disagree. Nationaity isn't permanent. It can be easily changed. But a race/ethnicity is permanent. It signifies where your forefathers are from.

 

[AViet]

The most successful group in USA is German-Americans. There is no way Filipono is more successful than German-American

I use the criteria of household income by race (2019 data):

List of ethnic groups in the United States by household income - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

- Fillipino American: $89.109
- japanese American: $80.036
- German American: $75.586

Of course, there are other criteria of success. Therefore, such cherry-picking comparison of ethnic Indian and Chinese in the US are not meaningful.

 

[nahtanbob]

I use the criteria of household income by race (2019 data):

List of ethnic groups in the United States by household income - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

- Fillipino American: $89.109
- japanese American: $80.036
- German American: $75.586

Of course, there are other criteria of success. Therefore, such cherry-picking comparison of ethnic Indian and Chinese in the US are not meaningful.

That is a narrow outcome of success. German Americans are wildly successful in science, politics and business. There are 44 million of them compared to 2 million Filipono Americans most of whom are 1st or 2nd generation immigrants

If household income is a criteria Indian and Taiwanese Americans blow Filiponos off the list

 

[Shehr Abbasi]

Indians have a natural grasp on the English language whereas Chinese are duffer. Not to mention the poetry and creativity are disregarded in Confucian philosophy whereas encouraged in the major Indian philosophies. This means genetic decencies in DNA proteins for generations in the Chinese is holding them back. The scientific method & creativity beyond porcelain, paper, and gunpowder has always been lacking in Chinese societies for centuries.

 

[Shehr Abbasi]

Chinese American have long history of persecution in USA unlike Indian Americans

In the colonial era they were kicked around like dogs, a convenient docile punch bag for Americans
View attachment 698861


In the segregation era, Chinese Americans were not allowed to have same privileges as white Americans

This led ghettoization of their community and creating local crime groups like Triads

These Triads primarily smuggled their fellow country men like cattle-

View attachment 698866


The one's who survived ended up being dishwashers and massage parlour staff in China towns

The triads also immensely benefited from a swarm of Chinese crawling on their bellies to USA in order escape Great Leaps and cultural revolution in their Mao land





Being a son/daughter of Triad criminal/massage parlour whore the social mobility of American Chinese makes them eligible to be only overseas wumao for CPC


I am sure many Indian posters have seen plenty of examples of Chinese-American posters' s behavior here which points to the above

Indian Americans on the other hand started migrating primarily during the IT boom of 2000s, best period in US history for Immigrants

Good thing Pakistani Americans have understood the value in this and didn't end up unlike their Rotterdam counterparts
View attachment 698873

Indians have also faced the American boot. Search up "Bhagat Singh Thind" and how he struggled to obtain US citizenship. Although an Amritsari Sikh, he was classified as White under American law but not able to reap benefits due to cultural differences. Although, Chinese have been on the rough side of American history.

Pakistanis whom migrated to the US in the 1960s have assimilated completely into American society. They have lost touch any resemblance w/ Pakistan. Caucasians whom gain light skin over a few generations. This phenomena is the same like Lebanese, Italian, Egyptian migrants.