What's new

Why India is not a superpower

See below :

Is India truly a SuperPower...?
The Greatest Comedy of the 21st century is India claiming itself as a Superpower.

Where as, America is a true SuperPower, because it holds the UN, IMF, UNESCO...and whatever you name it, in its tight control either by force or by its sheer manipulative methods and it is the only country in this world which can attack any other country saying these countries have dangerous nuclear weapons of mass distruction, but let us not dig deeper into the American political **** and focus now on why India, which always announces itself as a Superpower on every opportunity it gets, Sucks.

Wikipedia defines a "Superpower" as a country that has the capacity to project dominating power and influence anywhere in the world, and sometimes, in more than one region of the globe at a time, and so may plausibly attain the status of global hegemon. But unfortunately, India is nowhere near this definition and depends on every small country around it for their favour.

Speaking with common sense, lets try to analyse the present "Mumbai Attacks". For example, In our apartment block, lets say there are 15-Houses, and if a resident, say "Mr.I" is attacked brutally and some of his family members are murdered by one of his neighbour "Mr.P" , then naturally speaking, "Mr.I" has three choices :

1. He must be so furious, that he may go to any length to take revenge on "Mr.P", and kill every tom, dick and harry in his family.
(or)
2. Report the matter to the Police and wait patiently like an idiot till they arrest"Mr.P".
(or)
3. "Mr.I" must stop complaining and shut his *** with his own hands and remain silent like a moron without self esteem.

The fact is : India has chosen the 3rd choice, which clearly proves that India is not a Superpower...but a Superpoor country ruled by impotent morons.
 
. . .
^^^^^another bunch of idiots,,,,,,from a developed state(pakistan)......can't you guys look at your own.....you might get tears if you look around your self, instead of that you are laughing at India...we should find a name for your kinda people better than azz(-)oles,.....etc...
 
. . .
2vnjfp0.jpg

'It hurts the pride of Indians to be reminded of the country's poverty. But the existence of poverty itself does not hurt their pride.' Photo: Reuters

Rich Indians have forgotten the country cannot meet the basic needs of poor people.

Rich Indians hallucinating about India becoming a superpower have had delivered a much-needed thump on the head courtesy of a study by the London School of Economics, which found that it's doubtful if the country can ever become a superpower.

The whole notion that India is an ''emerging superpower'' has always been ridiculous and whoever first mooted the idea - Bill Clinton or George Bush - during the excess of goodwill that invariably accompanies a state visit, should have been bundled off to a laboratory to have his brain dissected to locate the precise site of the raving lunacy.

Even more preposterous has been the uncritical alacrity with which rich Indians embraced the notion when all they have to do is drive a few kilometres outside the big cities to rural India for a flashback to the 18th century or, even closer to home, to a nearby slum to see disease, hunger and misery that beggars belief.

The LSE study by nine India experts concludes that, despite ''impressive'' achievements, India is unlikely to become a superpower for many reasons including "the increasing gap between the rich and the poor; the trivialisation of the media; the unsustainability, in an environmental sense, of present patterns of resource consumption; the instability and policy incoherence caused by multi-party coalition governments''.

The study adds: "India still faces major developmental challenges. The still-entrenched divisions of caste structure are being compounded by the emergence of new inequalities of wealth stemming from India's economic success.''

These inequalities take your breath away. While the rich consume luxury goods and the middle class buys fancy cars and gadgets and holidays in Bangkok, they blind themselves to the reality for 700 million or so immiserated Indians. In their vainglorious dinner-table talk about ''superpower'' status, they forget that a country that cannot meet a poor person's most basic needs - enough food, clean drinking water, and electricity - has no business aspiring to superpower status.

One has always heard that Indians have traditionally lacked a certain respect for the facts
but this wilful disregard of reality is disturbing. Affluent Indians have bought the superpower fantasy not just because of a contempt for the facts, but from pride and vanity and a tendency to get all puffed up the moment the country manages any achievement.

So an obscure international award for some Indian film, a bronze medal in a sport that no one watches, an Indian company's takeover of a foreign company, or an Indian kid topping a maths exam in the US, are all trumpeted as evidence that India has conquered the world.


This is the reality: about 400 million Indians have no electricity; India has more mobile phones than toilets; millions of children are not in school; most cities have no sewage treatment systems; no major city has a continuous water supply; disease is rampant; infrastructure is pitiful; and a UNICEF report released this month says there is acute malnutrition and hunger among the urban poor, with 54 per cent more infants dying from among the urban poor than from the urban non-poor. Another UNICEF report found that 93 million Indians live in urban slums, on pavements and construction sites.

Yet should anyone plead that the poor have been left behind they will be subject to heated criticism. It hurts the pride of Indians to be reminded of the country's poverty. But the existence of poverty itself does not hurt their pride.

Economic growth rates of about 8-9 per cent over the past few years have been justifiably praiseworthy. But the benefits of this growth have been confined to the middle class and the rich.

The poor still do not have homes, basic sanitation, decent schools or nutritious food. As a young girl in American author Katherine Boo's much-acclaimed new book Behind the Beautiful Forevers, about life in a Mumbai slum, says: "We try so many things but the world doesn't move in our favour."

Middle-class Indians need to read Boo's book about life in a rat-infested hovel, near a sewage lake, with rampant dengue fever, malaria and tuberculosis, with scraps for meals, a single toilet for 100 families and then try claiming that India is becoming a superpower. There are many criteria for defining a superpower, but for India an extra one should be added. Let no one utter the world ''superpower'' till every Indian family has a toilet in their home.

India Is Not A Superpower
You are just copying and pasting the whole issue.From your avtar you just seem like that slimey maggot which you truelly are.Been here and there ,but don't find you anywhere.BTW MEANT CIVILIZED PEOPLE.NOT YOU.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom