sms
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Messages
- 2,452
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
That would seem to be the key. A disconnect between the developer,the DRDO and the final consumer the Indian armed forces? Internal DRDO inefficeincies though,IMO,the former is the most likely,though I'm too far away to have any firm opinions. Compared to Pakistani projects,Indian projects do appear to have a loooooong gestation period,eg Tejas viz a viz the j17.
Not true... it's just the matter of availability of info in public domain. ... About Tejas vs JF 17 project..
Project start up : Tejas - 1988, FC1 - 1989
First flight : Tejas - 2001, FC1 -2003 - FC took longer than Tejas to develop - India had zero exp in airplane development
Introduction : Tejas -2013/14, FC1 - 2007 - FC1 included without FOC and was not able to fire BVR missile.
If we see - there is no much difference in development timeline. But contrary to PAF approach IAF wants a mature product.