None of that matters if someone's believe in Toheed!!! Accepting whomever's righteous status in history except the Prophets shouldn't be my concern as its not considered any pillar of islam. I myself gonna pray behind a nasibi for the sake of unity
Wrong, believing in taweed is not enough, because there are munafiq's in the rows of Muslims, believing in One god is not enough for Sunni's, for Shia maybe... You did not read my posts, denying the Wilayat of Ali RA will deemed you a Kaffir according to top Shia books, Ali RA imamat is not established by Allah nor by Rasool Allah nor by Ali RA himself as he never proclaimed himself a Imam let alone divinely appointed. As for unity, Sunni's have made this unity mistake with Shia only to be stabbed in the back every time. You can not be friend/brother with someone who curse your mother now can you? Ask Shia to stop cursing the mothers of believers, Sahabah and drop all sort of Bidat from their cult and we will have a start of lenghty dialog between the two sects, but even doing that will be of no use because a Shia can/will lie his/her way because Taqqiyya is one of main pillars of Shiaism which literally means you can be dishonest and lie about your faith when odds are against you, but time and time again we have seen Shia scholars with their Taqqiyya mode off, You can never tell when a Shia is telling the truth or lying.
Her status as the mother of believers remains uncontested and if you find anyone slandering her its between him and His Lord and the govt should penalise him for that. But narrating history remaining well within the bounds of Quran o Sunnah for the sake of explaining where and what went wrong coundnt be denied if the intention is serving Toheed and not indulging in personality worshipping while disconnecting him from The ultimate Universal Truth
In Pakistan, Shia do it in their private Majalis, in Tehran they do it as well supported by their Ayatuallah's, I can show you videos of their scholars who are well connected using disgusting language against her, and yet the congregation is doing Wah Wah Nara-e-Haidary etc there can be no peace with such people, neither will Rasool Allah would allowed it. Quran and Sunnah is very clear about the fundamentals, you are just trying to make it look vague to prove your Imamat which has no bases in either Quran nor the Hadeeth, we don't really care about small things but those small things literally means a lot, You can not call a non Prophet a Prophet, similar you can not call a Prophet, non Prophet... If I accept Mirza Qadiyan as Prophet that kicks me out of Islam, similar to that if I disbelieve in any of the rightful prophet I will be kicked out, With Shia is the Imammat and actually for 12vers Imams are greater than Prophets, Ask any Shia who is greater Ali RA or Mosa, Esa, Ibrahim or other prophets, they will say their " Imams " are greater than these messengers of Allah, which in itself is a statement of disbelief.
In the light of Quran and Sunnah Imam/Caliph Ali was a rightly guided ruler so any governor dare not to rebel under whatever pretext/excuse against a man literally forced to lead the ummah. What does the Quran and plenty of Sayings of The Prophet Saww tells us about obeying those in authority when the enjoin good and forbid evil and what if they don't? Should we initiate mutiny on every issue?
The Quranic verses won't change even if the roles gets REVERSED. Yeah but the concocted parameters of Adab and sanctity may bar many from following What Allah Swt commanded -------.
You see the highlighted part, despite you have no evidence of Ali been Imam you are calling him that, not that I have issue with calling him an Imam but the pretext of calling Ali An Imam shows the Shia ideological difference, I understand Pakistani Sunni Mullah use Imam Hussain RA or Hasan to get support from Shia lobbies but if you are calling them Imams, why not accept them as infallible Imams then and become a Shia? In the light of Quran there is no Ali in Quran, Ali is/was/will remain a companion and son in Law of Rasool Allah, he holds a very important place but turning him into something he is not is wrong, and saying its from Quran and Sunnah is actually a ballant lie against the two most primary sources of Islam. You wanna lie against Quran be my guest, but stop calling yourself Muslim then.
As for the challenging the authority of the Caliph is yes wrong according to Quran, but also its wrong to not provide Justice to a innocent man who was murdered unjustly (uthman RA) we can easily turn it on Ali RA, but we know he has his valid reason not to go against the killers of Uthman RA, he wanted time and the decision of Zubair, Talha , Ayesha and Muawiyya RA to all was hasty and emotional, and yet even when two parties camp outside they did not initial the fight, because the dialog was successful and Hazrat Ali RA agreed to take revenge of Uthman RA, and we all know who saw this as a danger and later who or which people attack both sides in the middle of night to start the fight, Funny thing is Ali RA fought against his own fellow Muslims, he fought against his own mother and won, and yet not a single word of slander from him against Ayesha RA, but we hear from the people who claim to follow Ali, isn't that a joke ? Shiaism unfortunately has no credibility nor credential no historical no Quranic, or hadeeth evidence instead they have fabricated beliefs, made up stories and just lies, and unfortunately many falls for it without even studying their own sect, many just sit in Majlis and shout Nara-e-haider while ignoring the Shirk/slander that is happening from mimber.
