harrymohan
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2010
- Messages
- 483
- Reaction score
- 0
Dood even F-22 were crashed by US AF pilots! so the thumb rule is planes are going to be crashed, what matters most is, can u afford the crash and replace it with new one!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i have read sardar jee's post ... he is mentioning costs of jf17s equipment like he is project manager of jf17
Exactly ... This is what I want to highlight. An evaluation in the 80's cannot be used now. Everything has changed given the frequent upgrades required to stay current.
You did not reply to the evaluation of EF, Raf, ...
where the hell you got this information, honestly man do you even think before writingSo that means just because PAF has been maintaining western jets for a long time its means that they can maintain another 120-200 odd jets. We are talking about MRCA deal here which will bring a total of possibly 200 jets. The PAF does not have a big enough infrastructure to maintain such a huge number of jets in addition to what the currently have or are going to have in the near future. One engine also means less power, Half of the world is not mad to prefer having their main strike jets being dual engine. The F-18 has a much better maintenance ratio than many single engine planes, so does that mean the PAF acquires that ? Please do some research before you yourself post.
Wow now that's a big statement.
and I was right. wasn't I?
Please stick to topic. If you have anything to contribute please do, but stop derailing and trolling.
Exactly ... This is what I want to highlight. An evaluation in the 80's cannot be used now. Everything has changed given the frequent upgrades required to stay current.
You did not reply to the evaluation of EF, Raf, ...
I'm not the expert hope some senior memebers could help you.
A few years ago PN naval chief visited U.S.N aircraft carrier and he evaluated F-18, don't remember much about it but for sure if you through diffrent threads you will find the sources and complete informations.
Rafale were evaluated by PAF infect some persons in PAF loves Rafale then F-16's as stated by senior members and they also provided sources. So all that you have to do is going through diffrent threads.
EF Typoon are well evaluted by PAF and i will not mention the name of the most senior member who admit that PAF pilot was flying typoon in England although we are not interested in i, same as PAF pilot is flying J-11 for PLAAF.
As i stated i'm not the expert but read all these informations on this forum backed by credible sources and there was a strong debate on all these matters, you have to google through diffrent threads bcz it's you who need the information not me!
desiman
The PAF does not have a big enough infrastructure to maintain such a huge number of jets in addition to what the currently have or are going to have in the near future
Senior member doesnt mean that u will post anythng without any research and implement it anywhere you like
You know what, I like your spirit. You proved your point in a nice manner. Keep it up.
Respect.
Actually there's a difference between evaluation and checking out. What PAF pilots have done till date is checked out these planes and not evaluated them on all fronts. Evaluation takes time. They are put to test in various ways to check for problems and ways to overcome them.
J-11 is not flown by PAF pilots.
Typhoon was also never flown by a PAF pilot.
Rafale was also not flown by PAF pilot.
F-18 was also not evaluated.
All these are rumors. The only plane evaluated by PAF are Mirage 2000 and Gripen.
thats a probability not a statement its mathematically possible int it