What's new

Why does China keep supporting Burma in the Rohingya crisis?

So suddenly you have such huge trust in India not to deport all of their illegal Bangladeshis back to BD?

Illegal means illegal, which means all countries have a right to expel them. Not that Bangladesh could do anything about it anyway, they are an Indian vassal state.


This is what pdf has come to...

A "TTA" openly trolling.

Consider yourself on my ignore list now.
 
Aung San Suu Kyi is supported by Western. She conforms to all Western values. So the Western supports her "control" of Myanmar.

Well that changed quiet a bit after this Rohingya issue. But obviously west will choose Suu Kyi instead of military for the sake of democracy in Myanmar.

I guess the movie is about her effort and sacrifice for democracy in Myanmar not about her current stance on Rohingya issue for which even west is not supporting her.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/03/can...r-aung-san-suu-kyis-honorary-citizenship.html

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/mya...t-loses-popularity-amid-ethnic-conflicts.html

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-to-be-stripped-of-freedom-of-edinburgh-award

https://www.thedailystar.net/rohing...ie-wiesel-ethnic-cleansing-bangladesh-1545265

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...rd-amnesty-international-rohingya/1969449002/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/23/aung-san-suu-kyi-fall-from-grace-myanmar

https://www.straitstimes.com/world/...ipped-of-freedom-of-paris-award-mayors-office

But now it's China's problem? WTF!!!

Well, China and Russia both are saying this issue is between Myanmar and Bangladesh but giving veto at UN at the same time and not staying neutral like India. Kinda double standard don't you think? If they think the issue is between two countries why they are getting involved every time? Let them handle it then diplomatically and why China cares if UN, Human Rights and West protest?

Besides China have some projects in Arakan. So even if they say one thing but do otherwise, they are actually involved, so this issue is partially China's problem too.

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/dip...sue-between-myanmar-and-bangladesh-says-china
 
Last edited:
Well, China and Russia both are saying this issue is between Myanmar and Bangladesh but giving veto at UN at the same time and not staying neutral like India. Kinda double standard don't you think? If they think the issue is between two countries why they are getting involved every time?

It actually makes perfect sense, if it is between Myanmar and Bangladesh, then China and Russia should keep the UNSC out of it.

Besides China have some projects in Arakan. So even if they say one thing but do otherwise, they are actually involved, so this issue is partially China's problem too.

Arakan is strategically important to China. As long as Bangladesh doesn't try to fiddle around with Arakan then they don't have to worry about that.
 
@CHACHA"G" @Arsalan
I thought I'd do a bit of research here on PDF about this person's obsession with these here words:
"intelligent"
"clever"
"forex"
"Bangladesh will be ...."
"false flag"
"butt-hurt"
"butt-hurts".
I started to count the number of times he's used these, when I got to a hundred and sixty, I gave-up.

he either projects his pain by calling people "butt-hurt" or says "you are not intelligent enough or clever enough to debate with ..."

provoke then blame when responded to, classic!

You are sad and pathetic.
Lol
 
You have comprehension problem?

India has carried out it's NRC exercise in Assam and has documented all it's Muslims as Indian citizens. Sorry but
it would not make sense for India to deport it's own citizens.




What happened to urging BD to fight Myanmar to settle the Rohingya issue?
Did you not say that you explicitly chose to not have a mutual defence treaty with them?

Anyway, BD economy is booming and billions of dollars of investments in energy, chemicals and steel is flowing in from all over the world and so BD is content to let China suck the life out of the Barmans for now.

He is talking crap. Chinese military won't go anywhere, that is exactly what the US wants, find an excuse to engage them. BD won't invade MM, we are not brainsless morons like the burmans. But if it does and China sends military, uncle sam will be right here directly supporting us. But these are nonsense, neither BD will attack Burma nor China will send military.
 
He is talking crap. Chinese military won't go anywhere, that is exactly what the US wants, find an excuse to engage them. BD won't invade MM, we are not brainsless morons like the burmans. But if it does and China sends military, uncle sam will be right here directly supporting us. But these are nonsense, neither BD will attack Burma nor China will send military.

Another CCP drone in action.
 
He is talking crap. Chinese military won't go anywhere, that is exactly what the US wants, find an excuse to engage them. BD won't invade MM, we are not brainsless morons like the burmans. But if it does and China sends military, uncle sam will be right here directly supporting us. But these are nonsense, neither BD will attack Burma nor China will send military.

LOL USA will support BD in a war against Myanmar and China? :lol:

Do you remember the USA sent aircraft carriers to the region in 1971, do you know which side they were on?

Now you are telling me that Donald Trump will sacrifice American lives to protect a Muslim country like Bangladesh. Donald Trump is much more likely to side with Myanmar against Bangladesh, since we know his stance regarding refugees and especially Muslim refugees.
 
LOL USA will support BD in a war against Myanmar and China? :lol:

Do you remember the USA sent aircraft carriers to the region in 1971, do you know which side they were on?

Now you are telling me that Donald Trump will sacrifice American lives to protect a Muslim country like Bangladesh. Donald Trump is much more likely to side with Myanmar against Bangladesh, since we know his stance regarding refugees and especially Muslim refugees.


Donald Trump will sacrifice US lives to destroy the biggest threat to it's hegemony and superpower status, China. Not to support us. He has been doing whatever he can to undermine China, starting with the trade war. China playing smartly and won't give them a chance to engage militarily.

You're too much of an idiot to understand this.
 
You're too much of an idiot to understand this.

Ad hominem attacks occur when someone loses an argument. :lol:

The USA has not tried to fight directly against China since the 1950 Korean War, when we pushed them into the longest retreat in the history of the US military.

Now if you believe China won't back up Myanmar and our strategic assets in Arakan, Bangladesh is free to try and see what happens.

As of right now, China, India and Pakistan are all selling weapon systems to Myanmar. Bangladesh has achieved the impossible, getting China+India+Pakistan on the same page.
 
Ad hominem attacks occur when someone loses an argument. :lol:

The USA has not tried to fight directly against China since the 1950 Korean War, when we pushed them into the longest retreat in the history of the US military.

Now if you believe China won't back up Myanmar and our strategic assets in Arakan, Bangladesh is free to try and see what happens.

As of right now, China, India and Pakistan are all selling weapon systems to Myanmar.
I thought China become free in 1949?
 
Ad hominem attacks occur when someone loses an argument. :lol:

The USA has not tried to fight directly against China since the 1950 Korean War, when we pushed them into the longest retreat in the history of the US military.

Now if you believe China won't back up Myanmar and our strategic assets in Arakan, Bangladesh is free to try and see what happens.

As of right now, China, India and Pakistan are all selling weapon systems to Myanmar. Bangladesh has achieved the impossible, getting China+India+Pakistan on the same page.

China will NOT support MM by sending military, they may supply them arms.

If China can send military for a country like MM for their so called interest, the all powerful US has 20 times more interest to send military to face China. You guys have been trying to avoid war at any cost for a long time because that's exactly the excuse the US needs. In Doklam standoff your media published inflammatory articles every for months but you did not dare because that will be the excuse US will need.
 
China will NOT support MM by sending military, they may supply them arms.

If China can send military for a country like MM for their so called interest, the all powerful US has 20 times more interest to send military to face China. You guys have been trying to avoid war at any cost for a long time because that's exactly the excuse the US needs. In Doklam standoff your media published inflammatory articles every for months but you did not dare because that will be the excuse US will need.

US will literally butt*uck China in air-sea battle right now.

China is smart enough to realise this as you say.
 
US will literally butt*uck China in air-sea battle right now.

China is smart enough to realise this as you say.

Sure, and lose all their carriers and capital ships to China's enormous stockpile of DF-26 anti-ship ballistic missiles. What a great trade, an expensive carrier, dozens of jet fighters and thousands of naval personnel in exchange for a cheap missile. :lol:

What happens though... if America again sends their carriers, like in 1971, but not on Bangladesh's side? Just like 1971?

Let me guess, you'll turn to India again. Except that India is also selling weapons to Myanmar. :rofl:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom