Why China can bark but can't bite?

[Super Falcon]

Must have mastrubated hard on the fake news ,if we are haramis what are you pillay.

Haha masturbate is ur hobby fact is u Indians have a history that u never accept anything original footages and pics are running all over internationaly that in Sikkim China made Indian Tikka boti

 

[Rollno21]

Haha masturbate is ur hobby fact is u Indians have a history that u never accept anything original footages and pics are running all over internationaly that in Sikkim China made Indian Tikka boti

Bro,Sikkim was claimed by China when we took it and made it part of our country.the area where the standoff right now dsnt belong to us.

 

[django]

China does not have balls to attack India....all they can do is rant on the internet.

You mean like you!!

 

[master_13]

Bro,Sikkim was claimed by China when we took it and made it part of our country.the area where the standoff right now dsnt belong to us.

Sikkim claimed by china? lol, when? Little inferior Indian army with spares now lining up a dark colored meat wall ready to be crushed by the chinese construction trucks? LMAO.

 

[Rollno21]

Sikkim claimed by china? lol, when? Little inferior Indian army with spares now lining up a dark colored meat wall ready to be crushed by the chinese construction trucks? LMAO.

When your CCP army fighting for CCP does actually something,quote me

 

[idune]

Why China can bark but can't bite?

Answer:
China can just bark and india runs back to its place. China does not need to waste energy to bite.

India searches for way out of border standoff with China
http://www.atimes.com/article/india-searches-way-border-standoff-china/

Chinese mind games are rattling Indian nerves on security
http://www.atimes.com/article/chinese-mind-games-rattling-indian-nerves-security/

 

[skylance]

the internet is full of Indian rats...

and maybe it's totally a trap for Indians. Chinese will let indians go this time after Modi swallowed the bait?I am not sure of it.

China just want to free Bhutan under Indian,but Indian provide themseft instead.exciting.China needs a hard f**k.and Indian get laid...

indians are right,they want 2.5 wars,then get it.really wise nation.

 

[Bharat Muslim]

Any updates? I Googled but I couldn't find since last 3-4 days. That's why asking.

 

[m3milk]

Our media don't talk about India very often. Even today most Chinese were not aware of the standoff between China and India. Maybe we just don't give a shit about India. I hope the standoff would be solved in peaceful ways. We would gain nothing by beating the shit out of India.

 

[帅的一匹]

Our media don't talk about India very often. Even today most Chinese were not aware of the standoff between China and India. Maybe we just don't give a shit about India. I hope the standoff would be solved in peaceful ways. We would gain nothing by beating the shit out of India.

They just jump upside and down for attentions.

 

[desimorty]

Our media don't talk about India very often. Even today most Chinese were not aware of the standoff between China and India. Maybe we just don't give a shit about India. I hope the standoff would be solved in peaceful ways. We would gain nothing by beating the shit out of India.

No, you definitely give a shit about your largest neighbor. Difference is your media is tightly controlled and monitored. The CCP pushes agendas through their media. Not Chinese media, its CCP. All controlled by the party for the party. India the media is not so tightly controlled. They are free to jump over to report on any absurd story.
Talked to professors from Singapore and China on this, we we got talking about China. They believe that CCP stereotypes India with media for the mass Chinese to argue against democracy. Because its easy to say to anti CCP pro democracy supporters, you want democracy, look at India. And if your image of India is poor destitute nation of Saharan Africa. It gives legitimacy to CCP rule. Disowning the fact the Taiwan also is more developed with a democratic elections, albeit only recently. India has no hidden agenda on this media war. They will talk about China if it sells. What sells more is Pakistani topic. Terrorism and religion.

 

[idune]

China sure can bite but China is taking time to make sure "hit India’s Achilles’ heel". Here are some realities for india.


"
But Indian strategists fail to see that a new confrontation with China may not necessarily be a replay of the 1962 war. It could be far worse.

In an editorial on Friday, the Chinese Communist Party mouthpiece Global Times wrote on the month-long military standoff between China and India in the China-Bhutan border region: “If New Delhi remains stubborn, India should get prepared for all possibilities from a potentially grave escalation of tension….

“The PLA’s mobility and logistics capability cannot be matched by that of its Indian counterpart…. [People’s Liberation Army] troops may appear in any area beyond the Line of Actual Control that was previously controlled by India…. China does hold a lot of cards and can hit India’s Achilles’ heel.”

The “Achilles heel” unmistakably refers to J&K. An earlier Chinese commentary called the Ladakh region of Kashmir, currently controlled by India, disputed territory claimed by China, Pakistan and India. Such statements are unprecedented.
............

The “muscular diplomacy” toward China and Pakistan pursued by the present government in India, mentored by Hindu nationalist groups, has opened a Pandora’s box.

http://www.atimes.com/terrible-beauty-born-geopolitics-kashmir/
"

 

[Han Patriot]

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/24/asia/china-india-border-standoff/index.html

Indian national security adviser Ajit Doval will arrive in Beijing Thursday, the fourth visit by an Indian government representative since the beginning of the dispute last month

Really desperate it seems....not a single Chinese visited India.. They come begging like dogs.

 

[Well.wisher]

Bitchy title by Bitchy indians .
Indian's only know bitching .

 

[HariPrasad]

A Sino-Indian armed conflict: Why China can bark but can't bite?

Defence Minister Arun Jaitley's recent riposte to the Chinese bullying over Doklam standoff and the response it evoked from China sum up the new reality of Sino-Indian relations: Jaitley said India was no longer the India of 1962 (when it was defeated by China in a war) and China replied it was also not the China of 1962.

Even though both meant something else, the fact is the two countries have come a long way from just being inimical neighbours. Bilateral and global contexts have completely changed from 1962. China may be a bigger military and economic power than India, but it can hardly afford a military conflict today.

China's global ambitions
During the past few years, Chinese President Xi Jinping has unleashed a grand propaganda for image makeover of the country. China does not want to be perceived as a bigger, richer and more powerful North Korea. In his first speech to the World Economic Forum at Davos in January, Xi surprised the world by defending economic globalisation and speaking against emerging protectionist trends all over the world.

Since there are signs of the US backing off from its position of the global leader, China is eyeing that role. But for that it needs to shed the image of a bellicose dictatorship and an unreliable trader. That's why China is increasingly presenting itself as a responsible power to the world.

China's global dream is best exemplified by its One Belt One Belt (OBOR) initiative where it tried to portray itself as a responsible global economic force which is willing to work for greater economic good of all.

Bullying and belligerence run counter to China's ambition to replace the US as global leader or at least its rhetoric of emerging as a responsible world power and a reliable, open economy. In the Doklam standoff, China has stooped to a new low of threatening to encourage separatism in Sikkim while it had started with a threat of armed conflict. Such posturing will hardly evoke confidence in innumerable small countries in Asia and Africa with whom China seeks economic partnership.

Regional challenges
China's efforts for supremacy in Asia are often challenged by India. A recent example is Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). It is a proposed free trade agreement (FTA) between the 10 member-states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Australia, China, India, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand.
For China, it means a lot as it will account for about 40 per cent of world trade. RCEP will provide much-needed markets for Chinese goods.

But, as Foreign Policy has reported, the China-backed trade deal meant to cement the Beijing’s dominance in Asia has veered off course because India is hesitant to open its borders to cheap Chinese goods. Though the RCEP is likely to be finalised by the year-end, it may not be exactly in the form China would like.

China's ambition to set the rules of the game, at least in Asia, is often frustrated by India. India's boycott of OBOR is a good example. An armed conflict with India will certainly put an end to China's dream of an overarching role in Asia. China can fulfill that dream only by engaging India positively.

The trade dependence
China-India trade cooperation has deepened over the years and the bilateral trade has grown 24 times in 15 years, from $2.9 billion in 2000 to $70.8 billion in 2016. China has emerged as one of the fastest-growing sources of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) into India. It was 17th largest in 2016, up from the 28th rank in 2014 and 35th in 2011. A number of Chinese companies are setting up manufacturing units in India. It is India that depends on China in the trade equation—India's trade deficit with China has risen to $46.56 billion. China's exports to India account for only 2 per cent of its total exports.

Yet, no one can deny India offers China a promising market. An armed conflict will threaten trade ties. Maybe that's why China stopped Indian pilgrims from visiting Mansarovar but not trade through Nathu-la. China stopping the trade route might have invited a similar Indian response.
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...n-bark-but-cant-bite/articleshow/59471122.cms

Because china is an old outdated dragon who has no teeth. FOr barking, Teeth are not required but biting, it does.

China sure can bite but China is taking time to make sure "hit India’s Achilles’ heel". Here are some realities for india.


"
But Indian strategists fail to see that a new confrontation with China may not necessarily be a replay of the 1962 war. It could be far worse.

In an editorial on Friday, the Chinese Communist Party mouthpiece Global Times wrote on the month-long military standoff between China and India in the China-Bhutan border region: “If New Delhi remains stubborn, India should get prepared for all possibilities from a potentially grave escalation of tension….

“The PLA’s mobility and logistics capability cannot be matched by that of its Indian counterpart…. [People’s Liberation Army] troops may appear in any area beyond the Line of Actual Control that was previously controlled by India…. China does hold a lot of cards and can hit India’s Achilles’ heel.”

The “Achilles heel” unmistakably refers to J&K. An earlier Chinese commentary called the Ladakh region of Kashmir, currently controlled by India, disputed territory claimed by China, Pakistan and India. Such statements are unprecedented.
............

The “muscular diplomacy” toward China and Pakistan pursued by the present government in India, mentored by Hindu nationalist groups, has opened a Pandora’s box.

http://www.atimes.com/terrible-beauty-born-geopolitics-kashmir/
"

Still china can not do anything except issuing warnings.