What's new

WHO'S KASHMIR HAPPY?

abhi k lye Kashmir rehn de

PTI ka jhanda lehrao IK ki rallies pe, naareybaazi karo, online activism karo, apni fauk k khilaaf bolo..

we are busy developing Kashmir
ffkmkcqo_chenab-bridge-pti_625x300_13_August_22.jpg


forex reserves bhi theek thaak hai

investors bhi aa rahe hai

insurgency bhi under control hai

_90397693_mediaitem90395534.jpg
321349424_1504175043407967_3953875084834372529_n.jpg

Wow. So much gold that it literally flows out of your pants. Mr. Virus
 
. .
You were the aggressors in 1947 and we were the ones to go to UN for settling the issue. Read up on UN mandate on Kashmir.
That's no valid claim. It was a local & tribal uprising against then maharaja which had nothing to do with india.
india was the real aggressor against Nizam, Goa & number of other princely states. Kasmiris never asked you to protect them against anyone.
 
.
That's no valid claim. It was a local & tribal uprising against then maharaja which had nothing to do with india.
india was the real aggressor against Nizam, Goa & number of other princely states. Kasmiris never asked you to protect them against anyone.
Goa was never a princely state, they fought a war of liberation against the Portuguese and won.



when the last of the colonial overlords were finally kicked out of India
 
.
I'm sure those living in IIOJK are happy with their curfews, Internet blackouts and the odd pellets being fired at them making them blind.
what makes you sure?

Yup, courtesy of Indian army, every citizen in IOK has been priveledged to access to transport provided by the IA and the same has ensured to keep the population in control.

View attachment 919827

you throw stones and run away, they catch you and make you sit there all cute and dolled up.
now your buddies come and throw stones at you - it is between you and your fellows.
simple.
 
.
It is abundantly clear that NO PAK kashmiri, including GB people and Indian Kashmiris, wishes to live with India or Pakistan.

If a vote is held, citizens will have the option of forming a new country. More than 70% of both sides will vote for the new country.

 
. .
That's no valid claim. It was a local & tribal uprising against then maharaja which had nothing to do with india.
india was the real aggressor against Nizam, Goa & number of other princely states. Kasmiris never asked you to protect them against anyone.
The Indo-Pakistani War of 1947–1948, or the First Kashmir War,[24] was a war fought between India and Pakistan over the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir from 1947 to 1948. It was the first of four Indo-Pakistani wars between the two newly independent nations. Pakistan precipitated the war a few weeks after its independence by launching tribal lashkar (militias) from Waziristan,[25] in an effort to capture Kashmir and to preempt the possibility of its ruler joining India.[26] The inconclusive result of the war still affects the geopolitics of both countries.

Hari Singh, the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir, was facing an uprising by his Muslim subjects in Poonch, and lost control of the western districts of his kingdom. On 22 October 1947, Pakistan's Pashtun tribal militias crossed the border of the state. These local tribal militias and irregular Pakistani forces moved to take the capital city of Srinagar, but upon reaching Baramulla, they took to plunder and stalled. Maharaja Hari Singh made a plea to India for assistance, and help was offered, but it was subject to his signing of an Instrument of Accession to India.

The war was initially fought by the Jammu and Kashmir State Forces[27][28] and by militias from the frontier tribal areas adjoining the North-West Frontier Province.[29] Following the accession of the state to India on 26 October 1947, Indian troops were airlifted to Srinagar, the state capital. British commanding officers initially refused the entry of Pakistani troops into the conflict, citing the accession of the state to India. However, later in 1948, they relented and Pakistan's armies entered the war shortly afterwards.[29] The fronts solidified gradually along what later came to be known as the Line of Control. A formal ceasefire was declared effective 1 January 1949.[30]
 
. . . .
.
The Indo-Pakistani War of 1947–1948, or the First Kashmir War,[24] was a war fought between India and Pakistan over the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir from 1947 to 1948. It was the first of four Indo-Pakistani wars between the two newly independent nations. Pakistan precipitated the war a few weeks after its independence by launching tribal lashkar (militias) from Waziristan,[25] in an effort to capture Kashmir and to preempt the possibility of its ruler joining India.[26] The inconclusive result of the war still affects the geopolitics of both countries.

Hari Singh, the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir, was facing an uprising by his Muslim subjects in Poonch, and lost control of the western districts of his kingdom. On 22 October 1947, Pakistan's Pashtun tribal militias crossed the border of the state. These local tribal militias and irregular Pakistani forces moved to take the capital city of Srinagar, but upon reaching Baramulla, they took to plunder and stalled. Maharaja Hari Singh made a plea to India for assistance, and help was offered, but it was subject to his signing of an Instrument of Accession to India.

The war was initially fought by the Jammu and Kashmir State Forces[27][28] and by militias from the frontier tribal areas adjoining the North-West Frontier Province.[29] Following the accession of the state to India on 26 October 1947, Indian troops were airlifted to Srinagar, the state capital. British commanding officers initially refused the entry of Pakistani troops into the conflict, citing the accession of the state to India. However, later in 1948, they relented and Pakistan's armies entered the war shortly afterwards.[29] The fronts solidified gradually along what later came to be known as the Line of Control. A formal ceasefire was declared effective 1 January 1949.[30]
I know Kashmiri history more than your wikipedia copy paste. Even though events around instrument of accession are dubious but still it's no reason for india to claim Kashmir. Junagarh did the same with Pakistan.
Kashmiri Maharaja was not in legal position to do that when princely states standstill agreement was in place. Same is applied to Nizam & Junagarh states. 75 years of indian hypocrisy & lies need to end.

So source, what should be PTV News and Doordarshan?
I didn't put any source to claim anything. Although I'm not sure the beating your pilot took in Kashmir counts.
 
.
It is abundantly clear that NO PAK kashmiri, including GB people and Indian Kashmiris, wishes to live with India or Pakistan.

If a vote is held, citizens will have the option of forming a new country. More than 70% of both sides will vote for the new country.

Partially true.
As a Kashmiri myself my 2 cents down.
90% of Kashmiris want an Independent state (free from India, Pakistan, and China).
However,
If independence is not an option and asked to choose any country among the three mentioned above;
99.9% of AJK nationals will choose Pakistan.
75+% from the Indian-occupied territories will choose Pakistan.
China got no chance either way.
 
.
If IOKJ is so prosperous maybe allow UN to visit the valley and write something on it. Also if atta is so cheap in India, why people are in absolute poverty in India?
We have huge population and the disparity is also huge.
In absolute numbers India poverty rate is less than 12% and falling by 1% every year. Yearly growth rate 6% and above.

Pakistan poverty rate is 36% and climbing 2 to 4%. Yearly growth rate 2% and above.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom