What's new

Who Needs An Islamic State?

Many thanks to Munshi Saheb: because this article should be read at least 2 or 3 times - who needs an "Islamic" state? I don't know, I really can't imagine anyone who would - and what is an "islamic" state anyway? What is the purpose of such a state?
you should specially ask Mr Zarvan to read this 20 times to get his mind reset.
 
.
Don't know about others but Pakistan is having a lot of internal probelms (from poverty to terrorism) and with having some serious tensions with India I think islamic govt is the last thing they would pray for.
Please don't take my post as anti pakistani
 
.
Are you some kind of nutjob or what? Kindly go to a hospital and ask for a MRI(Magnetic Resonance Imaging) of your brain and see if it is actually there or you were born with a empty skull

Hez not an Indian so no worries...hez totally alright
 
. .
Those who are favoring Islamic state also tell us that Islamic State according to which Sect ?? shia ? sunni ? barelvi ? deobandi ? etc etc ... the mullahs from these sects don't even sit together & can kill each other , declaring each other kafirs etc etc ...

Secular state is a way to go in which minorities are also protected & given freedom of religion & speech . Religion should be out of politics .
 
.
you should specially ask Mr Zarvan to read this 20 times to get his mind reset.


Ashok

These are losers - people who cannot even put together two paragraphs of reasoned positions - So long as they have their "orders", they are good for nothing - if they are were real arbis, at least they could life off the state in Arabia, in Pakistan, regardless of money they may or may not have, they have been unable to negotiate social mobility -- So, these are net loss, they have neither vocational skill nor aptitude, nor social standing - their only hope then, is in political Islam-ism - Check out my last post on the "Defending militancy" and you will see the type of religiosity that these losers find appealing and Why.
 
.
Hey is it mandatory for a islamic state to follow Shariad kaanoon.
 
. .
Ashok

These are losers - people who cannot even put together two paragraphs of reasoned positions - So long as they have their "orders", they are good for nothing - if they are were real arbis, at least they could life off the state in Arabia, in Pakistan, regardless of money they may or may not have, they have been unable to negotiate social mobility -- So, these are net loss, they have neither vocational skill nor aptitude, nor social standing - their only hope then, is in political Islam-ism - Check out my last post on the "Defending militancy" and you will see the type of religiosity that these losers find appealing and Why.
Can you provide me the link for "Defending Militancy". Let me have a quick brush up of all the bloggers post
 
.
Secular state is a way to go in which minorities are also protected & given freedom of religion & speech . Religion should be out of politics .

How are minorities only protected in secular states ? Minorities suffer in secular states too

Why can't they be protected in Theocratic states ?
 
.
Can you provide me the link for "Defending Militancy". Let me have a quick brush up of all the bloggers post

http://www.defence.pk/forums/current-events-social-issues/125811-defending-militancy-whos-islam-right-3.html#post2054169

---------- Post added at 05:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:31 PM ----------

How are minorities only protected in secular states ? Minorities suffer in secular states too

Why can't they be protected in Theocratic states ?


Substance of the Secular = Equality before the law

Can a theocratic state uphold "equality before the law"???
 
.
How are minorities only protected in secular states ? Minorities suffer in secular states too

Why can't they be protected in Theocratic states ?

minorities in theocratic states feel alien to the state. adopting a single state religion is a indirect way of telling minorities that you are second class citizens.
 
.
Assalam alaikum

a simple question just i did in other thread were minority oppressed in madina during PROPHET'S PBUH era.

TARIQ
 
.
http://www.defence.pk/forums/current-events-social-issues/125811-defending-militancy-whos-islam-right-3.html#post2054169

---------- Post added at 05:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:31 PM ----------




Substance of the Secular = Equality before the law

Can a theocratic state uphold "equality before the law"???

But suppose a Islamic state ruled by a Caliph gives protection and rights to all its citizens irrespective of religion.... and gives equal opportunity to everyone barring some military and high government posts .... what is wrong with that ?
 
.
But suppose a Islamic state ruled by a Caliph gives protection and rights to all its citizens irrespective of religion.... and gives equal opportunity to everyone barring some military and high government posts .... what is wrong with that ?

the bold part is wrong, where is equality in this
 
.
Back
Top Bottom