In short, Pakistan army is. Instead of arresting dharna holder for treason, they allowed dharna for the whole month damaging Pakistan economy totaling more than 500 billion rupees damaged. The whole point of restricting PMLN to dummy to make PMLN look bad in term of governing affairs.
If you're going to argue for civilian supremacy, keep in mind that the Army could not arrest politicians for holding rallies - that's the responsibility of the police. And as I pointed out in my previous post, the issue did not even have to get to the point of dharna's if that imbecile ganja Prime Minister had done the sensible thing and agreed to IK's demands for a neutral investigation into rigging allegations.
The facts pretty clearly point to this being a total (and typical) PMLN screw-up.
Any kid can tell that PMLN is being set up to fail so Pakistan army can use the excuse to interfere and demand more powers over democracy and Pakistan as whole hence power-sharing agreement. Sometimes, reading between the lines can go the long way.
Again - give me tangible examples of restrictions being put in the way of the PMLN (after the Dharna, so you can't use that tired old excuse again) from performing?
Thank to USA and its warning to impose economic sanction on Pakistan, Pakistan army backed out in last min during Azadi march. Now Pakistan army is using other tactics, and ever since power-sharing agreement thank to Azadi march, Pakistan army can toy with Pakistan and PMLN for fun, and yet Pakistan army can get away easily without accountability.
That's just another nonsensical conspiracy theory to provide an excuse for Ganja's stupidity and failures that led to the Azadi March in the first place. The Army never had any intentions of stepping into the Azadi march, the Azadi march itself was the result of Ganja's stupidity and refusal to agree to an independent investigation into rigging allegations. The Army chose to stay neutral and sensibly urged restraint against violence by either party, as it should have. This was primarily a police matter and something that should have been resolved politically by good faith negotiations between the different parties, which is eventually, after a lot of chaos, what Ganja finally chose to do.
As long as the media and public are allowed the same standards for criticisms of the military over their failures and illegal acts. Are you willing to accept that? Fair is fair, right?
Absolutely. For example, the results of investigations into terrorist attacks on military installations should be made public, as should the broad details of any related court martial proceedings. While specific details of military processes and procedures don't have to be released, details of what failed (failures need to be addressed in any case) and the identities of those involved and the punishment handed out to them should be made public.
Military run welfare organizations such as the Fauji Foundation should be legally required to undergo independent audits and the income, benefits and tax records of military officers above the ranks of brigadier made public, along with all information related to how those benefits are paid for.