What's behind attack on Afghan Parliament?

[Nicky G]

Well Said.

Simply said Pakistan patronized Taliban when it suited them but they forgot you can't control terrorists.

Now that Taliban is acting against their interests it's much easier to lay the whole mess on India instead of introspecting and correcting their mistakes.

I wonder when will Pakistan govt come to its senses and stop breeding snakes in its backyard. It won't be long before likes of LeT which have Pakistani patronage turn into TTP and Afgan Taliban and attack Pakistan instead of India.

But then ofcourse that will be a RAW conspiracy again.

They can't stop using these strategic assets, only way to attack India without a war, or that's the thinking anyway.

I see that my thread was removed- "ISI sponsored attack on Afghan Parliament"

Why is this thread still present?

@Emmie @WebMaster @Horus @Irfan Baloch

You are at PDF sir, can't expect any different.

 

[Kesang]

Meanwhile Pakistan did not take any action against her strategic assets like good taliban and haqqani network in their operation zerb-e-azeb and blame on India when they attack afghanistan.

 

[Screambowl]

RAW chief personally told the OP that RAW sponsored this strike. Hilarious

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

This is not a question of what you guys consider to be justified or not, its about establishing who has used Taliban - the group which has claimed responsibility for these attacks - that points to just one country given current evidence.

Musharraf also stated that Ghani is a much more rational actor who is not supporting terrorism against Pakistan so that supports the claim that Pakistan had nothing to do with this attack.

 

[Nicky G]

Musharraf also stated that Ghani is a much more rational actor who is not supporting terrorism against Pakistan so that supports the claim that Pakistan had nothing to do with this attack.

Ghani might not be supporting anything against Pak but he sure has accused Pak of waging an undeclared war against his country as he put it.

The MoU signed clearly had much opposition within Afghanistan, this could very well be a message to them to shut up or else.

It would be stupid for India to destroy her own investments both directly and as a consequence of event unfolding.

Its all speculation of course but at the end of the day I see two major possibilities, the Taliban acted independently or at the behest of someone. If the latter is the case, thus far, we have fingers pointing in only one direction.

 

[Spring Onion]

1. Abdullah Abdullah lost
2. Ashraf Ghani won

and had improved relations with Pakistan.
In joint intel operations few anti-Pakistan terrorists were arrested from Afghanistan

Pak-China economic corridor

Russian interests in this corridor

Indian PM/MPs threatening Pakistan with attack out of frustration


So figure out who is upset?

 

[Zarvan]

As we all know about today's sad and tragic incident in Kabul I just wanted to discuss the possibilities of the key beneficiary of this assault.

Indian open resistance to ISI-NDS Intel deal is well known ( About CPEC they say it passes through disputed territory so we oppose it but this was between two countries that shares 1700 long border why oppose? Hate or some hidden complexes?) and this brazen attack in down town kabul will further strain Pakistan- Afghanistan ties and the only beneficiary will be India to some extent at least they would be able to ask their paid dogs in Afghan top circles to raise their barking and will only delay a peaceful solution to Afghanistan problems and will also effects Pakistani attempts to bring the parties on table for a meaningful dialogue.

I know some brain dead intellectual here may say Taliban accepted it but it wont change the reality that India is the biggest beneficiary of this attack and Taliban won't mind even owning something they didn't do as it will improve their image (as per their thinking) among their lower ranks and files and will improve their recruiting base.

To me it was done by Raw getting a few paid mercenaries is no big deal . Paisa phenk Tmasha dekh and shupa power India has plenty money to poke her nose in others affairs and dirty minded people like Doval who is on record to have admitted in a leaked video of sponsoring terror in Pakistan.

Any logical rebuttal or appreciation is welcome .

Taliban if not deny it that we would have to accept its them. They are already gaining areas and this attack will make sure Afghan Government pays more attention to Afghan Taliban and start serious talk. One thing is clear Afghan Army is not even close on winning against Afghan Taliban.

 

[Screambowl]

a. Mumbai Attack : Insider Job
b. Patronage of Kashmir Insurgency : Internal freedom fighting
c. OBL Hiding : American propaganda
d. Hakkani Patronage : Stopped doing that
e. Karachi /Baluchistan issues : RAW
f. Lakvi Release : No proof
g. Laskar : Social service provider
and so on------

Its your choice how you want to proceed. You can invent such far fetched irrational reasoning for each such incident or accept the root cause and address it for the sake of peace and prosperity of your nation--again your choice.

Nice one, and I have sympathy for CIA, how they managed to deal with inter services intel.

1. Abdullah Abdullah lost
2. Ashraf Ghani won

and had improved relations with Pakistan.
In joint intel operations few anti-Pakistan terrorists were arrested from Afghanistan

Pak-China economic corridor

Russian interests in this corridor

Indian PM/MPs threatening Pakistan with attack out of frustration


So figure out who is upset?

Pakistan because none of the above is a success yet and Pak fears Indian offence, so such attacks are warning to Indians except for ghani winning elections.

 

[Spring Onion]

Nice one, and I have sympathy for CIA, how they managed to deal with inter services intel.




Pakistan because none of the above is a success yet and Pak fears Indian offence, so such attacks are warning to Indians except for ghani winning elections.

We are sure India needs at least 100 years to start growing balls for any offence even against BD let alone Pakistan.

 

[Screambowl]

We are sure India needs at least 100 years to start growing balls for any offence even against BD let alone Pakistan.

BD is very far from you. Let's remain on topic.

So according to you this attack was ISI's action because according to you India offensive capability is not enough to harm Pakistani interest?

 

[ito]

The fault is Ghani depended too much on Pakistan to rein in Taliban and bring Taliban to negotiating table. He ignored US, India and West for Pakistan. Now,after this attack, his position in Afghanistan will become shaky. Opponents will pounce on him.

We are sure India needs at least 100 years to start growing balls for any offence even against BD let alone Pakistan.

For any offensive...brains play 100 time more important role than balls. And too much big balls is little uncomfortable too.

 

[Mujraparty]

https://twitter.com/x/status/612949438651305984

https://twitter.com/x/status/612893147278897152

 

[Spectre]

BD is very far from you. Let's remain on topic.

So according to you this attack was ISI's action because according to you India offensive capability is not enough to harm Pakistani interest?

Excellent reply. You sir should have been a lawyer

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Ghani might not be supporting anything against Pak but he sure has accused Pak of waging an undeclared war against his country as he put it.

... and that Afghanistan and Pakistan should make peace and get over their respective differences, the latter part provides further context.

The MoU signed clearly had much opposition within Afghanistan, this could very well be a message to them to shut up or else.

That makes no sense, since such attacks would only strengthen opposition to the MoU within the Afghan Parliament, and in fact it is the continuing Taliban violence in Afghanistan that is the biggest justification given by those who oppose Ghani's outreach to Pakistan so for the ISI to support such an attack at a time when some Afghans oppose Pakistan-Afghan collaboration precisely because of continuing Taliban attacks, makes absolutely no sense.

It would be stupid for India to destroy her own investments both directly and as a consequence of event unfolding.

Structures can be rebuilt relatively quickly - damaged relationships between States (as would be the case in this hypothetical argument of India gaining the most out of continued high profile Taliban attacks in Afghanistan) are much, much harder to rebuild.

Its all speculation of course but at the end of the day I see two major possibilities, the Taliban acted independently or at the behest of someone. If the latter is the case, thus far, we have fingers pointing in only one direction.

As I argued above, if the Taliban acted at the behest of someone, then that someone has to be India, since they have the most to gain (and Pakistan the most to lose) from such attacks and the responsibility for such attacks being pinned on Pakistan.

 

[Emilly David]

Taliban if not deny it that we would have to accept its them. They are already gaining areas and this attack will make sure Afghan Government pays more attention to Afghan Taliban and start serious talk. One thing is clear Afghan Army is not even close on winning against Afghan Taliban.

Lulz they killed all 7 rats and no casulty from their end and you are talking about their guts.