Whatever

[langda khan]

No.
Mahabharat started because RAM was angry at a woman who asked him and his brother to marry her(just a polite request). In return to her offer/request, RAM and his brother cut the nose of this lady. This lady was the sister of Rawan. When Rawan heard this news, he abducted the wife of RAM, Seeta, but never touched her.
But in the end, Rawan was the real villain.
Inna lillahi wa Inna ilyhi rajioon.

Bro you have Mahabharat and Ramayan mixed up. No worries.

 

[fitpOsitive]

Bro you have Mahabharat and Ramayan mixed up. No worries.

Ok, my apologies. Btw, what caused Mahabharat?

 

[Maula Jatt]

Ok, my apologies. Btw, what caused Mahabharat?

Who gives a f bro?

 

[langda khan]

Ok, my apologies. Btw, what caused Mahabharat?

Mahabharat (in my opinion) was a war that kind of cemented the schism between the Iranics and Indics post the Battle of the Ten Kings. And then led to the Puranic age.

Who gives a f bro?

Clueless yank flexing as a desi still schooling in Urdu spotted.

 

[Maula Jatt]

https://dunyanews.tv/en/WeirdNews/679218-YouTuber-Azlan-Shah-gifts-baby-donkey-to-wife-Warisha
@lastofthepatriots @deliva125
Need your comments

 

[M. Sarmad]

Mahabharat (in my opinion) was a war that kind of cemented the schism between the Iranics and Indics post the Battle of the Ten Kings. And then led to the Puranic age.

The battle of 10 kings may have been the inspiration for the 'Mahabharata' tale.

The battle was fought in Punjab, near Ravi. Rigveda was composed in Punjab. And Punjab is mostly a part of Pakistan now.

 

[langda khan]

The battle of 10 kings may have been the inspiration for the 'Mahabharata' tale.

The battle was fought in Punjab, near Ravi. Rigveda was composed in Punjab. And Punjab is mostly a part of Pakistan now.

I'm not an expert and not very informed on this but the Battle of Tem Kings predates the Mahabharat ... by quite a lot. There is no doubt though that both elements (Iranic and Indic) still warred in the latter. Probably the final break. Punjab consolidated on the Indic side. West of the Indus the Iranic.

 

[fitpOsitive]

Mahabharat (in my opinion) was a war that kind of cemented the schism between the Iranics and Indics post the Battle of the Ten Kings. And then led to the Puranic age.

Kia bat hai aapki.

 

[Maula Jatt]

I'm not an expert and not very informed on this but the Battle of Tem Kings predates the Mahabharat ... by quite a lot. There is no doubt though that both elements (Iranic and Indic) still warred in the latter. Probably the final break. Punjab consolidated on the Indic side. West of the Indus the Iranic.

oh lord... Moron to say the least

 

[lastofthepatriots]

https://dunyanews.tv/en/WeirdNews/679218-YouTuber-Azlan-Shah-gifts-baby-donkey-to-wife-Warisha
@lastofthepatriots @deliva125
Need your comments

I’m guessing he is Lahori. So the implication of his gift to his new wife is that she better get busy in the kitchen ASAP.

 

[Mustang125]

https://dunyanews.tv/en/WeirdNews/679218-YouTuber-Azlan-Shah-gifts-baby-donkey-to-wife-Warisha
@lastofthepatriots @deliva125
Need your comments

Maybe an indication that if I can’t satisfy you, tu khotay da leh layi? Lol. The dude is a major simp or even a closet cuckold kissing the khota like that. Ma nigga will do anything.

 

[fitpOsitive]

 

[langda khan]

@M. Sarmad i cannot post on that thread anymore so replying here. Clueless wannabe @Maula Jatt has likely bitched to the mods about me.

No it clears nothing actually. We've only come to the conclusion that Brahmins make up close to 5% of the Indian population. Which if Brahmins were a separate religion, would put them as a distinct small (proper) minority, compared to the muslim "minority" (technically the second largest majority in India). Larger only than Christians and Sikhs.

And regardless of the numbers, my initial contention to @Valar. still stands . And that is that Brahmins are the new Dalits of modern India. Marginalized, increasingly disenfranchised, poor and forgotten by every government. Most of the intellectual capital leaving our shores and becoming CEOs , scientists, bankers and doctors in the west.

@SIPRA @Hellfire2006 @Chat SAMOSA @-=virus=-

 

[M. Sarmad]

@M. Sarmad i cannot post on that thread anymore so replying here.

No it clears nothing actually. We've only come to the conclusion that Brahmins make up close to 5% of the Indian population. Which if Brahmins were a separate religion, would put them as a distinct small (proper) minority, compared to the muslim "minority" (technically the second largest majority in India). Larger only than Christians and Sikhs.

You got locked out?.. You didn't post anything wrong... Maybe off topic though..

No, there is no authentic data to suggest that Brahmins make up close to 5% of the Hindu population. As per available Data, they are 7.5 to 8% at least.

And you are making false equivalence. That's a fallacy. Ethnicity and religion are 2 entirely different things. The largest ethnic group can never be termed minority. You compare an ethnic group to other individual ethnic groups, not all of them combined

 

[langda khan]

You got locked out?.. You didn't post anything wrong... Maybe off topic though..

No, there is no authentic data to suggest that Brahmins make up close to 5% of the Hindu population. As per available Data, they are 7.5 to 8% at least.

And you are making false equivalence. That's a fallacy. Ethnicity and religion are 2 entirely different things. The largest ethnic group can never be termed minority. You compare an ethnic group to other individual ethnic groups, not all of them combined

No fun in debating from the sidelines.

As another Khan once said, Mujhe kyun nikala.