What's new

Whatever

Thank you paa ji. In my free time I write a funny and satirical blog with cartoons. The blog is a commercial failure, but I make it a point to write 2-3 articles every week, because my wife has a hearty laugh after reading it. I do it only for her. We all need just one person to make our life worth it. If all of us had that one person, we would have a beautiful world.

You are right. There is perhaps no life, whatever worth it is, without some strong attachment to another person. Bertrand Russell, being an agnostic, gave a great weightage to this aspect.
 
. .

Let me explain what the issue is .
Sainik school is basically military boarding school , admission is very hard to get .
When one aspires to join the army in later life, those who are part of national cadet Corps or students of sainik schools are preferred over others

Because these kids are disciplined etc from earlier age itself.
Now IAS is indian administrative service aka babudom aka bureaucracy, which are rulers of india in reality
So if a poor kid becomes a ias officer, a collector of a zila or district in start he basically rules that district

There are sainik schools in Bihar but as usual, to get admissions there is very tough
 
.


Let me explain what the issue is .
Sainik school is basically military boarding school , admission is very hard to get .
When one aspires to join the army in later life, those who are part of national cadet Corps or students of sainik schools are preferred over others

Because these kids are disciplined etc from earlier age itself.
Now IAS is indian administrative service aka babudom aka bureaucracy, which are rulers of india in reality
So if a poor kid becomes a ias officer, a collector of a zila or district in start he basically rules that district

There are sainik schools in Bihar but as usual, to get admissions there is very tough
mera naam hai ch... :lol:
 
.
Who cares about these media folks , only those who can't do anything else in life.
Take a course in mass communications
Ther are dime a dozen media folks .
Only watchable channels in india are. DD news , its channels in regional languages like dd kashir, dd telugu etc. And prasar bharti radio network.
These are government owned , but these are the most unbiased sources without any and I mean any partisan bias.
Unlike private channels

Where you are from ?
 
. .
they were Turkic or Central Asian people who were Muslim - you were fighting them not only you Muslims of present-day Pakistan(yes they were Muslims at the time- we have been Muslim since 10th-11th century) have had much much more brutal encounters with these forces, the likes of which you never experienced, some of our heroes, festivals celebrated fights against these forces, I don't know how can anyone mix us with them lol, clans still argue over who killed Ghori, (Now not saying some didn't support them- history is complicated ghaznawid General who marched into Persia for ghaznavid was a Hindu jat- ancient times is complicated )
Some clans supported them, some had fights, depending on the situation alliances switched and the region was in a constant state of rebellion against Delhi which was ruled by Muslim kingdoms (same empires yall despise for being Muslims- their rebellion threat was a many a time from Muslims regions not hindu) and this region was Muslim majority too
(they were in rebellion mode when they were non-Muslim and Delhi was non-Muslim too but that's another matter, I see this as a cultural trait more than religious) - how can you make such simplistic views of fighting "Islam" or "Muslims", it's childish

Yes, history is mixed. For example, Akbar had a trusted Hindu general in form of Man Singh who was one the Navratans of Akbar's court and Man Singh fought against Hindu rajas. This Wikipedia page more about Man Singh. OTOH with the Hindu Maratha raja Shivaji there were many Muslim commanders :
Shivaji Kon Hota? recounts the role which numerous Muslim commanders played in Shivaji’s armed forces. There were at least 13 major Muslim commanders or soldiers in Shivaji’s army: Siddhi Hilal, Daulat Khan, Ibrahim Khan, Kazi Haider, Siddi Ibrahim, Siddi Wahwah, Noorkhan Beg, Shama Khan, Hussain Khan Miyani, Siddi Mistri, Sultan Khan, Dawood Khan and Madari Mehetar.
@Blueindian, you as a Maratha or a Marathi person will find the above quote interesting and its article very interesting.
 
.
It is an auto immune disorder. While there are medicines for it (HCQS), they cause blindness in some people. She already has impaired eyesight since childhood and has been struggling with vision.

It is so nice that you married her knowing her progressive condition and respected her as a person. :tup:
 
. .
Sir ji,
Saari zindagi hi udhaar ki hai. Jab se paida huay hai, countdown shuroo ho gaya hai.
My wife has a health disorder which is incurable. It is slowly destroying her organs. For this reason we could never have children also. I never bothered about it. I want to make sure that whatever time we have in this world, we enjoy it to the fullest, without stress and hate.

In Sanskrit we have a term called 'Kshan Bhangur', meaning 'destroyed in a moment'. Life is like that, destroyed in moment. Pata nahin kab full stop aa jaye.
Wish I could unread this 😭
 
. .
I don't know if you follow Max Fosh in youtube, you can check this guy. He does some really unique stuff. Couple of video I recommend -


 
.
I am saying that a small clique of Koreans has no rights to select the government for all the Koreans.
South Korea is now a fullblown democracy and North Korea is about as authoritarian as You can get.
For South Korea this means job accomplished.
How many North Koreans have a say in how the country should be governed?

I am replying here because it would be considered off-topic there. Can an ordinary British citizen or American citizen stand in the parliaments there and make known his or her views on matters of the city, of national and international decisions that the government is making ? Oh yes, in India's the citizens can sit in the two national parliaments ( yes, two ) but only as spectators. They cannot participate. The indian parliaments, Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, are modeled on the British House of Commons and House of Lords. Lok in Hindi means people but the people, the masses, the citizens cannot speak in the parliament nor have any direct say in the running of the country so how do you claim that the Anglo political system that forms basis of the Western bloc is democracy ? It is anti-democracy really.

And forget about NATO nonsense ratings like "Demoracy Index". The Libyan Jamahiriya was the first true democracy in the modern world - Venezuela is now enabling that system locally - but Libyan Jamahiriya would rate very low on this "Democracy Index" and the plutocratic, thieving, war mongering American government would rate very high. :lol:
 
.
I am replying here because it would be considered off-topic there. Can an ordinary British citizen or American citizen stand in the parliaments there and make known his or her views on matters of the city, of national and international decisions that the government is making ? Oh yes, in India's the citizens can sit in the two national parliaments ( yes, two ) but only as spectators. They cannot participate. The indian parliaments, Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, are modeled on the British House of Commons and House of Lords. Lok in Hindi means people but the people, the masses, the citizens cannot speak in the parliament nor have any direct say in the running of the country so how do you claim that the Anglo political system that forms basis of the Western bloc is democracy ? It is anti-democracy really.

And forget about NATO nonsense ratings like "Demoracy Index". The Libyan Jamahiriya was the first true democracy in the modern world - Venezuela is now enabling that system locally - but Libyan Jamahiriya would rate very low on this "Democracy Index" and the plutocratic, thieving, war mongering American government would rate very high. :lol:
Anyone can speak their mind in public due to freedom of speech, and if they can convince enough people that they are worth listening to, then they can get elected into parliament and then they can speak.

With an 8 hour working day, you got around 7,5 million seconds per year. The United Kingdom has 67 million inhabitants. Each citizen therefore can be allocated a time of 100 milliseconds.

So the idea that each citizen should be allowed to speak in parliament is not practical.
 
Last edited:
.
Bari cute kuri hey yeah.. who is she.

Brought his convo here because two of my posts were deleted with the message "Off-topic exchanges must stop".

Yes, she is very cute. She is Rati Kosinova, the vice-president of Disha, a so-called Russian-Indian friendship society in Moscow which if you read the "About us" page I linked in the post you quoted, is comprised entirely of Indians even though it is supposed to be a society for friendship with Russians and what kind of Indians are these ? The yoga, ayurveda and "We wuz Ancient Vedic Science Great" types who possibly believe that 100,000 years ago India had Hindus who had satellite-augmented internet, in vitro fertilization, advanced plastic surgery, stem cell treatments, motor cars and inter-galactic travel. :lol:

Now Rati Kosinova seems a girl with an India Hindu mother and a Russian father. The name Rati is a Hindu name :
Rati (Sanskrit: रति, Rati) is the Hindu goddess of love, carnal desire, lust, passion and sexual pleasure. Usually described as the daughter of Prajapati Daksha, Rati is the female counterpart, the chief consort and the assistant of Kama (Kamadeva), the god of love.
Appropriate name for such a cutie. :lol: It will be nice to learn yoga from her. ;)

Anyone can speak their mind in public due to freedom of speech

But only yesterday when I logged-into a USA-based big website I founded myself banned because for the previous two days I had spoken against Zelensky supporters' lies and Zelensky being supported by USA government. I wasn't allowed to speak my mind and allowed my due right to freedom of speech and expression which Western governments tom-tom that they have and you assign them highly in the "Democratic Index" ranking. :lol: Soon after the Russian operation began in Ukraine so many Western internet platforms expelled many Russians especially those associated with the Putin government or those Russians who were others like the Communists or those people in other parts of the world who didn't write what NATO dictated. I was one of those expelled. Just for writing the truth about Zelensky's Nazis. Freedom of speech indeed. :lol:

and if they can convince enough people that they are worth listening to, then they can get elected into parliament and then they can speak.

With an 8 hour working day, you got around 7,5 million seconds per year. The United Kingdom has 67 million inhabitants. Each citizen therefore can be allocated a time of 100 milliseconds.

So the idea that each citizen should be allowed to speak in parliament is not practical.

Yes I agree with your calculation and I wasn't saying that every citizen have time in the national people's congress one by one though it should have been ideally, much less imagine all the world's people gather in the world people's congress since our end intention should be to have a single progressive system for all the world's people, in fact for humanity wherever they might go in Nature's universe. But we must allow for the citizen of the society to have his or her say in the daily governance of their society at all levels.

Now dividing up people into Nations / Countries is irrational and unnatural since the concept of the Nation State itself is artificial and recent coming via the French Revolution 230 years ago which itself was a progressive movement to overthrow monarchy and feudalism which are anti-democratic. And then the second wrong thing is to build and lavishly maintain militaries, including huge militaries to defend the internal systems inside the country, mostly wrong systems in the Capitalist world and then using those militaries of wrong systems to wage war 10,000 kilometers away against countries which are progressive.

So the people of the society must have their say in the running of society but the Anglo system of the chaos of mostly Capitalist, war mongering and right-wing religious irrational political parties where the candidates spend money power and muscle power to convince the hearts and minds of frivolous and fickle people to vote for them is not democracy but demagoguery and is not the way to go, to cherish. India has had Anglo-style what you call democratic elections for most of its modern existence since 1947 yet India is the biggest failed state in the modern world and in its fully known history going back to 3000 years. Some threads of mine on some of the situation in modern India :

The democracy in India, as with any Anglo-style system, is not the democracy for the citizen but for the democracy for the Capitalist, the military-industrial complex, for the war monger, for the right-wing religious irrational, for the oppressor whether within the family or in the hospital or in the government. The above situation in India exists in 2022 despite 75 years of your so-called democracy. 75 years of the constant cycle of another chaotic competition in elections to convince the misguided and the fickle voter. In fact the situation in India exists because of that so-called democracy you unfortunately cherish. Yet India is called by irrational, jingoist Indian nationalists and by the Indian establishment's NATO backers as "World's largest democracy" and the similar system, USA, as "World's oldest democracy". I can spend a 100 years by standing in elections and trying to convince the few hundred million right-wing-oriented mindless unprotesting wage-slave Indian middle class people to reject their traditional and modern irrationalities and not be callous and disconnected from society but contribute to society positively for the first time in their lives and arrange Indian society such that the potentially one billion workforce in India be put to good use, but I will fail. :lol:Through multiple political parties, elections and votes India has not changed in 75 nor will it change through that system in the next 75 unless there is external techno-economic change or development ( like the space industry ) or political influence ( world war or the world's militaries deciding to change India ) or an internal change brought somehow by progressive Indians. So elections is not the way to go.

OTOH you can do a revolution, abolish the multiple political parties to have a zero party system, abolish the traditional parliaments, overthrow traditional irrationalities and give governing power directly into the hands of the masses under a very simple scientific structure and under the time-to-time guidance of the revolutionaries. Progressive direct democracy. True democracy. Add this with a rational welfare-based society. All together yielding a Socialist-Communist society like the Libyan Jamahiriya. Please read this post of mine on more about Democracy and non-Democracy. Do read the full of it and that thread.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom