Whatever

[Hyde]

well, in genral, the cell phone cameras need sufficiently lit enviornment to take photo, but most digi cams have somekind of mumbo jumbo mechanism to rectify such problems. besides, digi cams have more settings and options than cell cams to take a perfect snap.

not much difference in terms of picture quality man............. Experience matters

 

[Hyde]

1D has an excellent grip, the handling is awesome. Excellent one for heavier lenses.

hmmmmmm.........................

 

[mjnaushad]

Looks like Zaki and Killbill dont comment on other threads anymore. You guys come here for "whatever".

 

[KillBill]

well, in genral, the cell phone cameras need sufficiently lit enviornment to take photo, but most digi cams have somekind of mumbo jumbo mechanism to rectify such problems. besides, digi cams have more settings and options than cell cams to take a perfect snap.

True, the SLRs will have

Image stabilizers
Dust protector
Highers range of ISO for darker places
wide range of Aperture
Control over shutter speed etc

Cell cams usually have a fixed setting for all above. So its more or less like a marketing gimmick nothing else

 

[Hyde]

Looks like Zaki and Killbill dont comment on other threads anymore. You guys come here for "whatever".

if you check my posts from my profile you will come to know i had a long debates about Zaid Hamid and Islam in various threads in past 3-4 days.

Sometimes i even had to post like 3-5 long paragraphs in each post and then read and comment again. It was a long debate.

Like KillBill said, whatever is your relaxation lounge. I also enjoyed talking in other threads

 

[KillBill]

Looks like Zaki and Killbill dont comment on other threads anymore. You guys come here for "whatever".

You are very true.

No offence, but tell me one thing, Do you really see any good discussion happening these days in the forum in other threads?

Either its ZH, MF Hussain or some mud slinging competition.
Or same issues over and over being discussed. Like who won 65 war, why BD was created, Whose pilots are better, Did India cheat in Dam construction etc.

 

[Hyde]

True, the SLRs will have

Image stabilizers
Dust protector
Highers range of ISO for darker places
wide range of Aperture
Control over shutter speed etc

Cell cams usually have a fixed setting for all above. So its more or less like a marketing gimmick nothing else

i wasn't talkin about 3.2 megapixel SLR cameras in general. I was only referring to Compact cameras. MjNaushad is using compact camera if i am not wrong.

I was comparing 3.2 compact camera with Mobile

SLR is very different camera

 

[mjnaushad]

if you check my posts from my profile you will come to know i had a long debates about Zaid Hamid and Islam in various threads in past 3-4 days.

Sometimes i even had to post like 3-5 long paragraphs in each post and then read and comment again. It was a long debate.

Like KillBill said, whatever is your relaxation lounge. I also enjoyed talking in other threads

i know.........just kidding

 

[mjnaushad]

You are very true.

No offence, but tell me one thing, Do you really see any good discussion happening these days in the forum in other threads?

Either its ZH, MF Hussain or some mud slinging competition.
Or same issues over and over being discussed. Like who won 65 war, why BD was created, Whose pilots are better, Did India cheat in Dam construction etc.

The answer is NO. I agree. So i am also here taking a rest before i go to the battlefield again

 

[Hyde]

You are very true.

No offence, but tell me one thing, Do you really see any good discussion happening these days in the forum in other threads?

Either its ZH, MF Hussain or some mud slinging competition.
Or same issues over and over being discussed. Like who won 65 war, why BD was created, Whose pilots are better, Did India cheat in Dam construction etc.

lol.......................

You took words of my mouth

I don't really understand people sometimes fill like 5-10 pages debating useless topic. I don't really understand what they find interesting in those useless threads.

 

[Hyde]

The answer is NO. I agree. So i am also here taking a rest before i go to the battlefield again

so you come here to relax and prepare for your next target

 

[KillBill]

i wasn't talkin about 3.2 megapixel SLR cameras in general. I was only referring to Compact cameras. MjNaushad is using compact camera if i am not wrong.

I was comparing 3.2 compact camera with Mobile

SLR is very different camera

True.

But no matter how good a SLR you have, compact ones are indispensable. Even NatGeo pros carry a compact along with the bulky SLRs.

Its always better to click one with compact to see how things are turning out and which Lens you need.

Boy I get carried away when the discussion goes to photography

Looks like I need to take up a second job to get money for my SLR

 

[KillBill]

lol.......................

You took words of my mouth

I don't really understand people sometimes fill like 5-10 pages debating useless topic. I don't really understand what they find interesting in those useless threads.

And we filled 205 pages

BTW where is Russki?

 

[Hyde]

True.

But no matter how good a SLR you have, compact ones are indispensable. Even NatGeo pros carry a compact along with the bulky SLRs.

Its always better to click one with compact to see how things are turning out and which Lens you need.

Boy I get carried away when the discussion goes to photography

Looks like I need to take up a second job to get money for my SLR

me too yaar...........

Photography is indeed a very interesting subject

 

[Hyde]

And we filled 205 pages

BTW where is Russki?

He is still enjoying the torture of Sisterhood

That is the only torture that you enjoy rather than suffer.