Joe Shearer
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,493
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
I am ALWAYS looking for what you keep so successfully camouflaged.
Cheers, Doc
Not camouflaged. Brought out, inspected pitilessly and rejected.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am ALWAYS looking for what you keep so successfully camouflaged.
Cheers, Doc
Not camouflaged. Brought out, inspected pitilessly and rejected.
The problem with these guys is the get their info from doctored whats app vids, they are barely able to take the time to read a newspaper or even look at the full debate. Its one of the reasons i do not argue with people like this as logic does not figure in the equation.This is why you get the reputation (deservedly in my opinion) of being a brain-dead Sanghi here.
As an off-chance I actually heard the whole sound byte on TV and not the doctored view here. Sadly for you and your shakha snippers.
He told Nirmala that he did not yet have concrete proof so far that SHE (or Parikar) were directly involved, but that he was completely certain (without the shadow of doubt) that Modi was.
@Joe Shearer @jbgt90
Cheers, Doc
Be careful what you look for, you might find it. If I cared for such things, I belong to the only ones Vidyasagar allowed into the Sanskrit College, besides the Brahmins.
You don't know me, Doc. None of you do. Thanks to you, someone browbeat me for an hour, explaining that moral rectitude and integrity in the face of odds was worth less than political expediency.
But it's there.
Just something you've decided you don't have much time for.
Evolutionary curve? Maybe.
History and circumstance? More likely.
Cheers, Doc
You really don't know Jack Squat about me, Doc. My loss.
Well ....
I rode halfway across the country and stopped overnight in your city only to meet you.
Only one other guy actually made the effort.
Cheers, Doc
So he has proof that Modi is involved? How many tims does he want an egg on his face. During the No Confidence motion the French govt slapped him when he claimed he met with the French President who told him about the corruption in the deal. Later his Pidis filed a PIL in SC and the SC dismissed it. Then there was that drama with the audio tape. When the speaker asked him to authenticate the tape he could not dare to do so. He feared a privilage motion. If the tape was real and he believed that it was real why didnt he authenticate it and take responsibility saying that yes I certify that this tape is real.This is why you get the reputation (deservedly in my opinion) of being a brain-dead Sanghi here.
As an off-chance I actually heard the whole sound byte on TV and not the doctored view here. Sadly for you and your shakha snippers.
He told Nirmala that he did not yet have concrete proof so far that SHE (or Parikar) were directly involved, but that he was completely certain (without the shadow of doubt) that Modi was.
@Joe Shearer @jbgt90
Cheers, Doc
So he has proof that Modi is involved? How many tims does he want an egg on his face. During the No Confidence motion the French govt slapped him when he claimed he met with the French President who told him about the corruption in the deal. Later his Pidis filed a PIL in SC and the SC dismissed it. Then there was that drama with the audio tape. When the speaker asked him to authenticate the tape he could not dare to do so. He feared a privilage motion. If the tape was real and he believed that it was real why didnt he authenticate it and take responsibility saying that yes I certify that this tape is real.
rahul's problem is that he is clutching at straws. he cant believe that a defence deal can take place without any kickbacks and scams. It is not his problem. This is what he has seen in his family. Right from the time of his great grandfather (the jeep scam) to his mother (Augusta Westland scam) all family members took part in tainted deals.
If as you say you have watched the full debate then you would have seen the responses given by Arun Jaitley and Nirmala Sitharaman. But as a Pidi you will take Rahuljis words as gospel and not bother with the response. The samee person who is NOT clear on the amount of the scam. The figure changes from rally to rally, speech to speech.
It is not doctored. But you wont understand. Keep licking rahuljis a$$.You were just called out for posting a doctored video and tweet.
You think I'm remotely interested in reading your mudane Sanghi gibberish? It's Sunday man.
Incest all around.
Cheers, Doc
Mleccha.
I'm luvving it.
@Nilgiri tell me when you last saw someone get Joe to go Hindu racist?
Cheers, Doc