Land for peace?
May be..I do not know...In J&K, Kashmir valley has issue, Jammu and Ladakh are culturally more peaceful people than these valley people..But not sure if anything in Kashmir issue is possible...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Land for peace?
What would Pakistan be willing pay to have India controlled Kashmir and Jammu??? everything has it's price.
IMO India should just sell it to Pakistan before war breaks out. The demographics alone are favoring Muslims over Hindus,Buddhists, and others.
How about $100 billion dollars?? paid over 10 years, can use a portion of this to pay the Hindu families that will have to be resettled, and the rest fighting poverty in the other states of India, and on strengthening the military.
The question I posed uses the word "both" for good reason.
Its not about Pakistan or India.
Its about Kashmiris who are suffering from Indian Brutal Occupation for over 70 years.
They should be given the right to choose their future , A PLEBISCITE .
I don't think there is any rocket science in that.
Why does any one have to be resettled at all, Hindus/Buddhists can stay on in Kashmir. The prize is that India will join the regional economic partnership, get access to Central Asia, buy permanent peace, maybe even become a super power if they can grow up. The economic dividends will cover all the costs.
Wouldn't work. Want a detailed explanation, or will that do?
It's a major lifeline for Pakistan, as a majority of fresh water flows from the region. Simply put, if Kashmir goes, Pakistan will likely collapse.
Like it did these past seventy years.
That is an important point for those who claim Pakistan cannot be a success without Kashmir, because its record clearly shows that it can be hugely successful even with only the part that it holds already. A bird in hand .......
What annoys me is the flat-out denial that India has stuck scrupulously to her part of an unfavourable treaty, and that Pakistani comment is full of speculation of what will happen if India overnight turns rogue.
That is an unfair statement. Pakistan's current geopolitical position forces it to make sure that Kashmir goes fully challenged.Like it did these past seventy years.
What annoys me is the flat-out denial that India has stuck scrupulously to her part of an unfavourable treaty, and that Pakistani comment is full of speculation of what will happen if India overnight turns rogue.
Obviously Aesop is taught very early in Pakistan. The story of the Wolf and the Lamb has gone deep into the psyche of some of those posting.
The problem is that each side sees the other as the Wolf and itself as the Lamb.
If Pakistan's only concern is water then we have NOT done anything YET
to hurt it ; inspite of all the acts of terrorism
The problem is not water or even Kashmir. The problem is a power structure that must keep its population terrified just enough to put up with its blatant exploitation. If it is not water, it will be onions or something else.
Then We South Asians are simply unfortunate
This conflict is nothing but Destiny or God's will