What's new

What If India Attacks Pakistan?

With our Submarine Arm to increase - with AIP subs, the application of our hypersonic anti ship missiles, and our very long range shore based anti-ship missiles, the chance of a blockade is very small.
 
.
I return to my contention that india as a civilization is one of the weakest and meek, in the history of mankind, she has been brutally violated, many many times, because her people lack courage.

India was a land of Knowledge and Wisdom and despite attacks on our faith and teachings, those still exist and goes to prove that the people of our land did not lack courage but were peace loving people. If this were to happen to any other civilization we wouldn't even be hearing of them today.

With our Submarine Arm to increase - with AIP subs, the application of our hypersonic anti ship missiles, and our very long range shore based anti-ship missiles, the chance of a blockade is very small.

But those are still a distant dream when compared to PN, while the IN on the other hand has started to wield it.
 
.
5e1698370a15030da9e8bf2d373b0ee6.jpg


428031132ea647543935779202e13caa.jpg


India was a land of Knowledge and Wisdom and despite attacks on our faith and teachings, those still exist and goes to prove that the people of our land did not lack courage but were peace loving people. If this were to happen to any other civilization we wouldn't even be hearing of them today.



But those are still a distant dream when compared to PN, while the IN on the other hand has started to wield it.

A peace loving civilization would not have invented the cast system or sati, or other outrages, no indian civilization was effeminate that is why it was conquered.
 
. .
A peace loving civilization would not have invented the cast system or sati, or other outrages, no indian civilization was effeminate that is why it was conquered.

Cast System and Sati System are Global Issues and are not confined to one single Civilization. Those existed in other civilizations as well. Do some research and besides, you open a new thread and we can discuss that in detail over there.
 
.
All the talks about civilizations and race are irrelevant here. Firstly, hardly anyone can claim of being a "pure breed", belonging to one race. Secondly, being from a warrior race means nothing if these "warriors" cannot operate under a leadership. Thirdly, in the current age and time technology and economy are more useful in a war than one's ancestors.
 
.
View attachment 140680

View attachment 140681



A peace loving civilization would not have invented the cast system or sati, or other outrages, no indian civilization was effeminate that is why it was conquered.

ha ha ha.... effeminate?? Indians?

By the way .. humare yahan shalwar auratein pehanti hain .. mard nahi..

Ever heard of "Baccha Bazi" ???? Pakistaniyon ka past time ...ha ha ha.. and you call us effiminate...

Aur suniye janab, Yeh wohi hindusatniyon ki kaum hai jisne .. aapke 1000 saal ke raj ke baad bhi aapko ek "moth eaten" "barren", "dry" state mein bhaga diya( kahan poora hindustan.. aur kahan ek sookha sa zameen ka tukda..called Pakistan). Ek East Pakistan se umeed thi, usse bhi 'effiminate' hindustaniyon ne khatam kar diya. Badi koshishen kee, ke Haiderabad, Junagadh Manavdar Pakistan mein shamil ho jayein.. lekin afsoos ke phir usi hindustaniyon ki kaum ne aapko na-kamyab kar diya. Kahan pahele musalmaon ka raj Afghanistan se Assam tak chalta tha ..aur aaj kahan Pindi se le kar Karachi tak bhi mushkil se hi chalta hai.

Uske elava, 48 mein ek nayi state Pakistan mein jodne ki ummeed thi, to janab ussi "effiminate" hindustani kaum ne wahan se bhi maar ke bhaga diya. Phir usske baad na jaane kitni na-kamyab koshishon ke baad bhi saare mard-e-momin us zameen ko "effiminate" hindustaniyon se nahi jeet paaye. Na taqat se aur nahi hi dimagh se. Kabhi Pakistatani "strategic depth" ke sapne dekhte the afghanistan ke baare mein.. aur aaj ussi afghanistan se bachhte phir rahe hain.

Bus saare Pakistani mard-e-momin yehi ummeed laga kar baithe hai ki kahin woh "effiminate" hindustaniyon ki kaum humla na kar de, kyuki uske baad aapko apni zindagi ki umeed nahi hai. Agar nuclear bumb nahi istemaal kiya to Hindustani kaum bache-khuche Pakistan par kabza kar legi aur agar kahin nuclear bumb istemaal kar liya to phir, ussi hindustan se umeed karenge ki hindustan palat kar aapko hi na khatam kar de.

By the way you need to study about "Sati" instead of harping about it like a parrot. Sati has got nothing to do with Hindu religious practice and was even never practiced in whole of India.
And it was conquered only when it was not centrally ruled by a single kingdom and left the border states open to in-fighting.
 
.
Haq's Musings: India's Israel Envy: What If Modi Attacks Pakistan?

Newly-elected Prime Minister Narendra Modi government's rhetoric about "jaw-breaking" (munh tod) policy toward Pakistan is the latest manifestation of a disease described by Indian diplomat Sashi Tharoor as "India's Israel envy".

5cd7713163fc2871cfd372a18c897588.jpg

India's Israel Envy:

India's Israel envy is reinforced by the Hindu Nationalists over-estimating their country's strengthwhile under-estimating Pakistan's. It's aided by India's western allies' belief that Pakistan can not fight a conventional war with india and its only option to defend itself would be to quickly escalate the conflict into a full scale nuclear war.

Indian MP Mani has summed up India's war rhetoric against Pakistan in a recent Op Ed as follows:

(Indian Defense Minister) Arun Jaitley thumps his chest and proclaims that we have given the Pakis a "jaw-breaking reply" (munh tod jawab). Oh yeah? The Pakistanis are still there - with their jaw quite intact and a nuclear arsenal nestling in their pockets. (Indian Home Minister) Rajnath Singh adds that the Pakis had best understand that "a new era has dawned". How? Is retaliatory fire a BJP innovation? Or is it that we have we ceased being peace-loving and become a war-mongering nation? And (Indian Prime Minister Narendra) Modi thunders that his guns will do the talking (boli nahin, goli). Yes - and for how long?

India's Delusions:

Indians, particularly Hindu Nationalists, have become victims of their own hype as illustrated by Times of India's US correspondent who checked into the veracity claimed achievements of Indians in America and found such claims to be highly exaggerated: "On Monday, the Indian government itself consecrated the oft-circulated fiction as fact in Parliament, possibly laying itself open to a breach of privilege. By relaying to Rajya Sabha members (as reported in The Times of India) a host of unsubstantiated and inflated figures about Indian professionals in US, the government also made a laughing stock of itself." The Times of India's Chidanand Rajghatta ended up debunking all of the inflated claims about the number of Indian physicians, NASA scientists and Microsoft engineers in America.

Similarly, a US GAO investigation found that India's IT exports to the United States are exaggerated by as much as 20 times. The biggest source of discrepancy that GAO found had to do with India including temporary workers' salaries in the United States. India continuously and cumulatively adds all the earnings of its migrants to US in its software exports. If 50,000 Indians migrate on H1B visas each year, and they each earn $50,000 a year, that's a $2.5 billion addition to their exports each year. Cumulatively over 10 years, this would be $25 billion in exports year after year and growing.

Since the end of the Cold War, the West has been hyping India's economic growth to persuade the developing world that democracy and capitalism offer a superior alternative to rapid development through state guided capitalism under an authoritarian regime---a system that has worked well in Asia for countries like the Asian Tigers and China. This has further fooled Hindu Nationalists into accepting such hype as real. It ignores the basic fact that India is home to the world's largest population of poor, hungry and illiterates. It also discounts the reality that Indian kids rank near the bottom on international assessment tests like PISA and TIMSS due to the poor quality of education they receive. The hype has emboldened many Indians, including the BJP leadership, to push neighbors around.

Pakistan's Response:

Pakistan has so far not responded to the Indian rhetoric in kind. It might create an impression that Pakistan is weak and unable to respond to such threats with its conventional force. So let's examine the reality.

Ground War:

In the event of a ground war, Pakistan will most likely follow its "offensive defense" doctrine with its two strike corps pushing deep inside Indian territory. Though Indian military has significant numerical advantage, Pakistan's armor is as strong, if not stronger, than the Indian armor.

Before embarking on further offensive, gains shall be consolidated. Pakistan is also as strong, if not stronger, in terms of ballistic and cruise missiles inventory and capability, putting all of India within its range. These missiles are capable of carrying conventional and nuclear warheads.

d136ce831d9dc0fc131b5020f699178d.png
India-Pakistan Firepower Comparison Source: GlobalFirepower.com


In 1990 the Central Corps of Reserves was created to fight in the desert sectors, where enemy land offensives are expected. These dual capable formations trained for offensive and holding actions are fully mechanized. The Pakistan Army has ten Corps including the newly formed Strategic Corps. The Army has twenty-six divisions (eight less than India). Two more divisions were raised as Corps reserves for V and XXXI Corps. The Army has two armored divisions, and ten independent armored brigades. Presently one hundred thousand troops are stationed on the Pak-Afghan border to fight terror.

The Special Service Group – SSG - comprises two airborne Brigades, i.e. six battalions. Pakistan Army has 360 helicopters, over two thousand heavy guns, and 3000 APC’s. Its main anti-tank weapons are Tow, Tow Mk II, Bakter Shiken and FGM 148 ATGM. The Army Air Defense Command has S.A- 7 Grail, General Dynamics FIM-92 Stinger, GD FIM Red Eye, and ANZA Mk-I, Mk-II, Mk-III and HQ 2 B surface to air missiles. Radar controlled Oerlikon is the standard Ack Ack weapon system.

The ballistic missile inventory of the Army is substantial. It comprises intermediate range Ghauri III and Shaheen III; medium range Ghauri I and II and Shaheen II, and short range tactical Hatf I- B, Abdali, Ghaznavi, Nasr, Shaheen I and M -11 missiles. All the ballistic missiles can carry nuclear warheads....some can carry multiple warheads. Nuclear and conventional weapon capable Babur Cruise missile is the new addition to Pakistan’s strategic weapon inventory. It has stealth features to evade radar to penetrate India's air air-space to hit targets. The number of ballistic missiles and warheads are almost the same as those of India. So there is a parity in nuclear weapons, which is a deterrent.

Tactical missile which can be tipped with miniaturized nuclear warhead is the latest addition to Pakistan's arsenal. It's a battlefield weapon designed to destroy enemy troop concentrations poised against Pakistan.

Air War:

Pakistan has about 900 aircraft compared to India's 1800, giving India 2:1 numerical advantage over Pakistan. India's biggest advantage is in transport aircraft (700 vs 230) while Pakistan has some numerical advantage in two areas: Airborne radars (9 vs 3) and attack helicopters (48 vs 20).

Pakistan Air Force has over 100 upgraded F-16s and 200 rebuilt Mirage- 3's (for night air defense) and Mirage-5's for the strike role. They can carry nuclear weapons. They have been upgraded with new weapon systems, radars, and avionics. Additionally, the PAF 150 F-7's including 55 latest F-7 PG’s. Manufacture of 150 JF 17 Thunder fighters (jointly designed) is underway at the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex Kamra. The JF-17 Thunder is a 4th generation fly by wire multi-role fighter aircraft. Eight are already in PAF service. An order has been placed with China for the purchase of 36 JF-10, a Mach 2.3 -5th generation multi-role fighter, comparable in performance to the Su-30 Mk-1 with the Indian Air Force.

In spite of Indian Air Force's numerical superiority since independence in 1947, Pakistan Air Force has performed well against it in several wars. The PAF pilots have always been among the best trained in the world.

Complimenting the Pakistan Air Force pilots, the legendary US Air Force pilot Chuck Yeager who broke the sound barrier, wrote in his biography "The Right Stuff": "This Air Force (the PAF), is second to none". He continued: "The (1971) air war lasted two weeks and the Pakistanis scored a three-to-one kill ratio, knocking out 102 Russian-made Indian jets and losing thirty-four airplanes of their own. I'm certain about the figures because I went out several times a day in a chopper and counted the wrecks below." "They were really good, aggressive dogfighters and proficient in gunnery and air combat tactics. I was damned impressed. Those guys just lived and breathed flying. "

In 1965, Roy Meloni of the ABC reported: "Pakistan claims to have destroyed something like 1/3rd the Indian Air Force, and foreign observers, who are in a position to know say that Pakistani pilots have claimed even higher kills than this; but the Pakistani Air Force are being scrupulously honest in evaluating these claims. They are crediting Pakistan Air Force only those killings that can be checked from other sources."

Naval War:

Of the three branches of the military, India's advantage over Pakistan is the greatest in naval strength. Pakistan has just 84 sea-going vessels of various kinds versus India's 184.

Pakistan Navy can still inflict substantial damage on the Indian Navy. The Indian Navy has 17 submarines. Pakistan Navy has ten, some are brand new and equipped with AIP. Indian Navy has 28 war ships, Pakistan Navy has eleven.

As seen in the past wars, India will attempt a naval blockade of Pakistan. Here's how MIT's Christopher Clary discusses in his doctoral thesis the Indian Navy's ability to repeat a blockade of Pakistan again:

"Most analyses do not account adequately for how difficult it would be for the (Indian) navy to have a substantial impact in a short period of time. Establishing even a partial blockade takes time, and it takes even more time for that blockade to cause shortages on land that are noticeable. As the British strategist Julian Corbett noted in 1911, "it is almost impossible that a war can be decided by naval action alone. Unaided, naval pressure can only work by a process of exhaustion. Its effects must always be slow…. ". Meanwhile, over the last decade, Pakistan has increased its ability to resist a blockade. In addition to the main commercial port of Karachi, Pakistan has opened up new ports further west in Ormara and Gwadar and built road infrastructure to distribute goods from those ports to Pakistan's heartland. To close off these ports to neutral shipping could prove particularly difficult since Gwadar and the edge of Pakistani waters are very close to the Gulf of Oman, host to the international shipping lanes for vessels exiting the Persian Gulf. A loose blockade far from shore would minimize risks from Pakistan's land-based countermeasures but also increase risks of creating a political incident with neutral vessels."
Summary:

The probability of India prevailing over Pakistan in a conventional war now are very remote at best. Any advantage that India seeks over Pakistan would require it to pay a very heavy price in terms of massive destruction of India's industry, economy and infrastructure that would set India back many decades.

In the event that the India-Pakistan war spirals out of control and escalates into a full-scale nuclear confrontation, the entire region, including China, would suffer irreparable damage. Even a limited nuclear exchange would devastate food production around the world, according to International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, as reported in the media. It would set off a global famine that could kill two billion people and effectively end human civilization as we know it.

I hope that better sense will prevail in New Delhi and India's BJP government will desists from any military adventurism against Pakistan. The consequences of any miscalculation by Narendra Modi will be horrible, not just for both the countries, but the entire humanity.

Haq's Musings: India's Israel Envy: What If Modi Attacks Pakistan?
---
even then also Mr. Haq will go on with PDF..
 
.
ha ha ha.... effeminate?? Indians?

By the way .. humare yahan shalwar auratein pehanti hain .. mard nahi..

Ever heard of "Baccha Bazi" ???? Pakistaniyon ka past time ...ha ha ha.. and you call us effiminate...

Aur suniye janab, Yeh wohi hindusatniyon ki kaum hai jisne .. aapke 1000 saal ke raj ke baad bhi aapko ek "moth eaten" "barren", "dry" state mein bhaga diya( kahan poora hindustan.. aur kahan ek sookha sa zameen ka tukda..called Pakistan). Ek East Pakistan se umeed thi, usse bhi 'effiminate' hindustaniyon ne khatam kar diya. Badi koshishen kee, ke Haiderabad, Junagadh Manavdar Pakistan mein shamil ho jayein.. lekin afsoos ke phir usi hindustaniyon ki kaum ne aapko na-kamyab kar diya. Kahan pahele musalmaon ka raj Afghanistan se Assam tak chalta tha ..aur aaj kahan Pindi se le kar Karachi tak bhi mushkil se hi chalta hai.

Uske elava, 48 mein ek nayi state Pakistan mein jodne ki ummeed thi, to janab ussi "effiminate" hindustani kaum ne wahan se bhi maar ke bhaga diya. Phir usske baad na jaane kitni na-kamyab koshishon ke baad bhi saare mard-e-momin us zameen ko "effiminate" hindustaniyon se nahi jeet paaye. Na taqat se aur nahi hi dimagh se. Kabhi Pakistatani "strategic depth" ke sapne dekhte the afghanistan ke baare mein.. aur aaj ussi afghanistan se bachhte phir rahe hain.

Bus saare Pakistani mard-e-momin yehi ummeed laga kar baithe hai ki kahin woh "effiminate" hindustaniyon ki kaum humla na kar de, kyuki uske baad aapko apni zindagi ki umeed nahi hai. Agar nuclear bumb nahi istemaal kiya to Hindustani kaum bache-khuche Pakistan par kabza kar legi aur agar kahin nuclear bumb istemaal kar liya to phir, ussi hindustan se umeed karenge ki hindustan palat kar aapko hi na khatam kar de.

By the way you need to study about "Sati" instead of harping about it like a parrot. Sati has got nothing to do with Hindu religious practice and was even never practiced in whole of India.
And it was conquered only when it was not centrally ruled by a single kingdom and left the border states open to in-fighting.

All gobbledegok excuses, effeminate, indians ruled by foreigners for a millennium.
 
.
IF and IF ever india attacks pakistan

then we all indians will kick the *** of the fool who does so

because Pakistan is already on a self destruction mode / self disintegration mode

by attacking it first why distract them from that process
 
.
All gobbledegok excuses, effeminate, indians ruled by foreigners for a millennium.
woh toh duniya jaanti hai... ki kahan pahele gore amreeki aur ab peele cheeni raaj karte hain .. Kisne apni puri zindagi ghulami mein hi bitayi hain ... Mir Zafar aapki hi kaum se aate hain.

Grow some balls and stop the Americans(militarily) and Chinese(economically) raping your country before calling someone effeminate. You are the only one being raped left right and center by Iranians Indians Afghans Chinese Americans and god know who else.
 
.
woh toh duniya jaanti hai... ki kahan pahele gore amreeki aur ab peele cheeni raaj karte hain .. Kisne apni puri zindagi ghulami mein hi bitayi hain ... Mir Zafar aapki hi kaum se aate hain.

Grow some balls and stop the Americans(militarily) and Chinese(economically) raping your country before calling someone effeminate. You are the only one being raped left right and center by Iranians Indians Afghans Chinese Americans and god know who else.

Balls from india, who handed their country over to foreigners, I swear indians enjoy being slaves.
 
.
Balls from india, who handed their country over to foreigners, I swear indians enjoy being slaves.
yes., much bigger balls ,, none of Indias enemies won without bloodshed,, unlike Pakistanis who offer their asses to every tom dick and harry ,, afghan turk mongol pashtun,, jise dekho aapki maar ke chala jaata hai.. Hum to pahele bhi hindu the .. Aaj bhi hain.. Lekin pahele to aap hindu/buddhist/pagan the.. Afghan/turk aaye aap dar ke maare mussalman ho gaye.. Aap par to hansi bhi nahi aati sahab..
 
.
sorry for using bad example " Jo bhonktey hain Wo kattey nahi"
I doubt modi will attack
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom