Bad Guy
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2015
- Messages
- 974
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
It isn't your effective acquisitions.India spends 8 times more on defence as compared to Pakistan yet Pakistan has almost the same number of tanks + numerical advantage in gunships, self propelled howitzers ....others the difference is merely 1.5:1 or at max 2:1 , despite Pak being a smaller country, this shows Indian spending isn't effective, the stuff they purchase isnt worth the buck. Imagine their top supplier is US, they didnt buy any decent offensive weapon from them all these years except P8 anti sub warfare aircraft. Now compare the Pakistani acquisitions from US, which consist mostly of offensive weapons from MRAPS, F-16s, AIM 120 C, M109 Self propelled howitzers, cobras, super cobras, AH1-Z vipers plus tons of stuff. It is pretty embarrassing for Indians that an adversary with a smaller population, economy has done more effective & better acquisitions with limited economic resources.
You guys get a thing called subsidy on weapons. By guys also had to get a subsidy of 46% on F-16s which was later cancelled.
Even after that pakistan has almost same number of weapon
Tanks: India 6664, pak: 2990
Aircrafts: 2000-2200(including Naval) , pakistan:,around 1000.
I can mention everything but I've not much time.
India invests 1.74% on Defense, pakistan invests 3+%.
And never forget quality factor.