What happens after the American Century?

[rockstar08]

That just means China hasn't provoked them yet, with China the provoking will be less violent and more sublime it's unavoidable when dealing with powerful nations whether it's violent or not.

After watching the fate of two super power getting Fcuked in Afghanistan , i dont think chinese will do this mistake ..

 

[XenoEnsi-14]

After watching the fate of two super power getting Fcuked in Afghanistan , i dont think chinese will do this mistake ..

That kind of attitude could lead to your countries undoing, never trust a super power nation. They always crave more.

 

[Oldman1]

What happens after American Century? Its the American Millennium.

 

[Esc8781]

After watching the fate of two super power getting Fcuked in Afghanistan , i dont think chinese will do this mistake ..

Yeah, if it wasn't for the ROE or the American public inability to stomach a war, Afghanistan would of been steamrolled.

 

[idune]

Western powers are still democracies where public outcry is important

Pure BS. Western countries use different tactics to prevent public from being informed and to be mis informed. In general, public have no clue how they are being robbed and duped. So public outcry is controlled at different level. And when there is real outcry western countries are no different than Russia or any dictator, they attack and even kill. Look at France where protest against Israeli genocide is banned. Talking against Israeli atrocities are banned under pretext of "antisemitism".

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

They could just get money from China.

We aren't ready to play with fire like that.

Unlike America, we actually have physical borders to Central Asia, we aren't separated from them by a vast expanse of Ocean.

If America (that is geographically isolated and far away) could receive so much blow back from their support of the Afghan Mujadaheen against the Soviets, then how much blow back do you think we are going to get if we try to play beyond our capability like that.

 

[user1]

China is probably one of those rare states in history which has given more to it's client states as gifts than receiving tribute from them. This economic model continues in this modern age as China is able to assert itself economically.

Instead of following the model of Capitalist states, where the states tax their poor people to fill the coffers of rich people of the Third World, China has maintained it's traditional benevolent attitude towards the poor of the World.

Debts issued by IMF and World Bank always carry with them the 'Structural Adjustments' which in most cases have been disastrous to the Third World Economies. Instead of bribing the rich despots of poor world, China mostly gives soft development loans or invests in the infra-structure of these countries which are beneficial to the masses. On the top of that China has recently waived a huge $35 Billion loan to African countries, so, it just became as gift to them. Compare that with the IMF and World Bank, would they ever do that?

It's obvious future belongs to those are more helpful, rather than those who are more exploitative.

 

[XenoEnsi-14]

We aren't ready to play with fire like that.

So when your country is ready you will?

Unlike America, we actually have physical borders to Central Asia, we aren't separated from them by a vast expanse of Ocean.

Pakistan shares borders with India, Europe doesn't always get along with itself, China and Japan...... Just because you are share a physical border doesn't mean anything.

If America (that is geographically isolated and far away) could receive so much blow back from their support of the Afghan Mujadaheen against the Soviets, then how much blow back do you think we are going to get if we try to play beyond our capability like that.

Depends on how much they want you gone.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

So when your country is ready you will?

Unless we can somehow put two Oceans in between us and those regions, then probably not.

Such tactics provide no benefits to the Chinese nation, only increased risk.

Depends on how much they want you gone.

Painting China as an enemy is not exactly a difficult proposition, many of those extremist groups already consider us an enemy, just lower on the priority list.

 

[XenoEnsi-14]

Such tactics provide no benefits to the Chinese nation, only increased risk.

I never said you had to use same tactics as ours or anyone elses, you can use your own. Such as spying on American businesses and possibly others then using that information for your own good.

 

[shiv]

We aren't ready to play with fire like that.

Unlike America, we actually have physical borders to Central Asia, we aren't separated from them by a vast expanse of Ocean.

If America (that is geographically isolated and far away) could receive so much blow back from their support of the Afghan Mujadaheen against the Soviets, then how much blow back do you think we are going to get if we try to play beyond our capability like that.

china canot play pussy for long .. it has to take the iron throne sometime or another

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

I never said you had to use same tactics as ours or anyone elses, you can use your own. Such as spying on American businesses and possibly others then using that information for your own good.

Yes, we will have to go for more low-risk strategies like that.

Stability is the most important thing for China right now, our economic development cannot proceed without stability.

china canot play pussy for long .. it has to take the iron throne sometime or another

And what is the life expectancy of someone who sits on the "Iron Throne", the last occupant died in a pretty unfortunate manner, as I recall.

 

[shiv]

Yes, we will have to go for more low-risk strategies like that.

Stability is the most important thing for China right now, our economic development cannot proceed without stability.



And what is the life expectancy of someone who sits on the "Iron Throne", the last occupant died in a pretty unfortunate manner, as I recall.

history says the occupant die ! except the one who truly deserves

 

[XenoEnsi-14]

Yes, we will have to go for more low-risk strategies like that.

That is why I view your country as an enemy and that Pakistan and other countries should expect the same from you.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

That is why I view your country as an enemy and that Pakistan and other countries should expect the same from you.

So us preferring low-risk strategies, rather than your high-risk suggestion (funding Al-qaeda) makes us your enemy.

OK, why not.