What do you know about killing. (Part 2)

[Chinese-Dragon]

exactly. it's the internet, no one should take anyone seriously.

Exactly, it's an anonymous forum, anyone can boast about anything.

But when @jhungary claims to have killed multiple people in combat, even with a knife, then it stops becoming believable.

I kill multiple people IN WAR, using all the mean I have, my M4, my M9, my knife, my 50 cal on top of my Humvee, and my Humvee.

Oh so now you are claiming to have killed people with your M4, your M9, your knife, your 50 cal on top of your Humvee, and then killed someone by running them over with your Humvee?

So you are claiming to have killed a least 5 people, how many with your knife?

I think you were playing a video game on a multi-killing spree and you thought it was real life. Maybe that's why you keep boasting about how it "feels really good" to kill another human being.

 

[jhungary]

Oh so now you are claiming to have killed people with your M4, your M9, your knife, your 50 cal on top of your Humvee, and then killed someone by running them over with your Humvee?

So you are claiming to have killed a least 5 people, how many with your knife?

I think you were playing a video game on a multi-killing spree and you thought it was real life. Maybe that's why you keep boasting about how it "feels really good" to kill another human being.

I did not claim anything, I said I killed multiple people WITH TOOL (MEANS) THAT DISPOSED TO ME, did I claim I killed a person with M4, m9, my knife, my 50 cal and my Humvee each?

Either your head is not straight or you are in desperate need of a pair of reading glasses, and I am incline to think you are the first case. Or you probably need to go back to school and learn to read, which remind me to get a name from where you attend school from, I need to tell my relative to avoid that school LOL

And again, the burden of proof, the term you like to use, is on you, even if I did claim I kill 5 people with different method, YOU, are the one that need to show proof to discredit my claim, because I am not the one that brought my claim on trial here. You are.

LOL

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

I did not claim anything, I said I killed people WITH TOOL THAT DISPOSED TO ME, did I claim I killed a person with M4, m9, my knife, my 50 cal and my Humvee each?

Either your head is not straight or you are in desperate need of a pair of reading glasses, and I am incline to think you are the first case.

And again, the burden of proof, the term you like to use, is on you, even if I did claim I kill 5 people with different method, YOU, are the one that need to show proof to discredit my claim, because I am not the one that brought my claim on trial here. You are.

LOL

Asking for negative proof again?

How am I supposed to "disprove" your claims of having killed multiple people in armed combat, even with a knife, if I don't even know who you are?

Very convenient, right?

 

[jhungary]

Asking for negative proof again?

How am I supposed to "disprove" your claims of having killed multiple people in armed combat, even with a knife, if I don't even know who you are?

Very convenient, Mr. Knife killing ninja.

First of all, I never even used the term "Ninja Kill"

and yes, YOU ARE THE ONE that need to prove my claim is wrong before I need to show you anything.

Look at it this way, if I accuse that you are gay, wouldn't you need me to show proof that you are gay before you show proof to me that you weren't? So, if you cannot proof that you are not gay (which is by definition, impossible to proof), even if my accusation is ridiculous, then you, by "Positive Proofing" are gay? If what you said is true, then the court of law need to rewrite what contribute to libel.

Burden of PROOF lies on the accuse, don't make up word such as "Negative Proof", there are first and ONLY proof to satisfy the burden, and YOU ARE THE PARTY WITH THE BURDEN. if you don't know the law, don't quote the law, that is what lawyer is for. But then who am I kidding, you have a propensity to make yourself look big but without any actual skill to support you. LOL

Also, from now on, every topic I wrote regarding military operation and procedure, I will quote you, and if you failed to show up and discuss it with me, that show who are the actual internet warrior. LOL

Better be ready son.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

First of all, I never even used the term "Ninja Kill"

and yes, YOU ARE THE ONE that need to prove my claim is wrong before I need to show you anything.

Look at it this way, if I accuse that you are gay, wouldn't you need me to show proof that you are gay before you show proof to me that you weren't? So, if you cannot proof that you are not gay, even if my accusation is ridiculous, then you are, by "Positive Proofing" are gay? If what you said is true, then the court of law need to rewrite what contribute to libel.

Burden of PROOF lies on the accuse, don't make up word such as "Negative Proof", if you don't know the law, don't quote the law, that is what lawyer is for. But then who am I kidding, you have a propensity to make yourself look big but without any actual skill to support you. LOL

Also, from now on, every topic I wrote regarding military operation and procedure, I will quote you, and if you failed to show up and discuss it with me, that show who are the actual internet warrior. LOL

Better be ready son.

Excuse me, who is an internet warrior:

1) A person who claims to be a soldier, to have fought in wars, and to have killed multiple armed people in combat, even with a knife? (With absolutely zero proof).

Or...

2) A person who never made any of those claims.


You can decide which one is the internet warrior.

 

[jhungary]

Excuse me, who is an internet warrior:

1) A person who claims to be a soldier, to have fought in wars, and to have killed multiple armed people in combat, even with a knife? (With absolutely zero proof).

Or...

2) A person who never made any of those claims.


You can decide.

umm, excuse me. Who exactly is an internet warrior.

1.) A person who constantly write military related article/thesis and discuss it with anyone, American, Pakistani, Indian, British and so on, with a 315 positive rating and have 27 featured article?

2.) A person who keep asking people to show proof and use the wrong term didn't really knows it? Negative Proof...LOL

You can decide.

As I said, from now on I am gonna quote you on EVERY military topic I wrote, and if you fail to show up and discuss each and everyone with me, then we can see who is the internet warrior.

LOL

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

umm, excuse me. Who exactly is an internet warrior.

1.) A person who constantly write military related article/thesis and discuss it with anyone, American, Pakistani, Indian, British and so on, with a 315 positive rating and have 27 featured article?

2.) A person who keep asking people to show proof and use the wrong term didn't really knows it? Negative Proof...LOL

You can decide.

As I said, from now on I am gonna quote you on EVERY military topic I wrote, and if you fail to show up and discuss each and everyone with me, then we can see who is the internet warrior.

LOL

So you agree that you are the internet warrior here? Someone who talks big on the internet with a lot of wild claims and boasts, but has absolutely zero proof to back it up?

For the record, how many people are you claiming to have killed, that made you "feel really good"?

In the first page you talk about your "first" knife kill. What about the ones after that?

 

[jhungary]

So you agree that you are the internet warrior here? Someone who talks big on the internet with a lot of wild claims and boasts, but has absolutely zero proof to back it up?

For the record, how many people are you claiming to have killed, that made you "feel really good"?

In the first page you talk about your "first" knife kill. What about the ones after that?

Lol, since when did I agree I am an internet warrior? you better let the forum knows, oh wait a minutes, would they listen to internet warrior like yourself?

Asking proof all the time, not even know the meaning of burden of proof. LOL, you cannot even beat that.

As I said, from now on I am going to quote you on every military thread I made, be prepare to "proof" you are not an internet warrior that can only bark, no bites lol.

or you are too chicken to accept the challenge? LOL
You should change your name to Chinese Warrior. LMFAO

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Lol, since when did I agree I am an internet warrior? you better let the forum knows, oh wait a minutes, would they listen to internet warrior like yourself?

Asking proof all the time, not even know the meaning of burden of proof. LOL, you cannot even beat that.

As I said, from now on I am going to quote you on every military thread I made, be prepare to "proof" you are not an internet warrior that can only bark, no bites lol.

or you are too chicken to accept the challenge? LOL
You should change your name to Chinese Warrior. LMFAO

You avoided the question yet again.

On the first page, you were talking about your "first" knife kill (you claim). So how many other people have you killed with a knife?

As I said, from now on I am going to quote you on every military thread I made, be prepare to "proof" you are not an internet warrior that can only bark, no bites lol.

Sure, tag me whenever you like, if the thread is interesting I'll respond.

I never claimed to be a soldier (I think it is extremely pathetic to pretend to be a soldier when you are not), so obviously my opinions will be that of a layman. I will be happy to join a discussion in that capacity, if I find the topic to be of interest.

 

[jhungary]

You avoided the question yet again.

On the first page, you were talking about your "first" knife kill (you claim). So how many other people have you killed with a knife?

I did not avoid the question, I missed it completely, it was 7 am when I reply to you.

And the answer is this. I may have killed one guy with knife, I may have kill 20 guys with knife, but you will never know, because that is NONE OF YOUR FRICKIN BUSINESS. I can show you proof, but then did you even know what is a real 201 file looks like? Or real 214 file, you can talk all you want but they are irrelevant, you don't even know what is a real proof when it hit you in the face, how do you even know the proof was real? I mean what an INTERNET WARRIOR like you know about actual military document?

I talk about my first kill, and that's it, This is the scope, I did not make claim on how many people I kill in war, to be honest, I don't even know the actual number. So if you want to challenge that. Show proof I have not done them before. Aren't you are the one that talk about "Burden of proof"?

Haha

Sure, tag me whenever you like, if the thread is interesting I'll respond.

I never claimed to be a soldier (I think it is extremely pathetic to pretend to be a soldier when you are not), so obviously my opinions will be that of a layman. I will be happy to join a discussion in that capacity, if I find the topic to be of interest.

I never say you did, again, I said you are talking rough and no back up. All sausage and no sword. This is a defence forum, if you are not interested in defence/military related matter, you probably joined the wrong forum.

Again, you accuse me of being a fake soldier and fake vet? That mean YOU MUST HAVE KNOW MORE THAN ME TO KNOW I AM A FAKE, that mean you would have know a lot of military stuff I don't know, and that would mean if I was writing military related article, "Expert" like you would know "More" than a "Fake Soldier" like me. And I am not talking about stuff you can find in Wikipedia.

I am giving you more ammo to proof that I am a fake, and if you don't take up this challenge, that will mean YOU are the internet warrior, all talk and no action.

 

[gambit]

Excuse me, who is an internet warrior:

YOU are. You and your fellow Chinese in this forum.

Did any American on this forum demanded proof of any of you being Chinese? No, we took your words for it. Further, when you post in Chinese, as how often you guys get away with flaunting forum rules because there is a Chinese member of the admin staff, there is no need to doubt that YOU are Chinese.

The proper context of what is a 'keyboard warrior' is not whether someone has killed in military service, but whether or not that person has actually SERVED in uniform to match his tough talk on the Internet. Not only that, given how technically demanding is today's military, technical knowledge is another way to be assured that the person speaking/posting has crossed the 50/50 threshold of being who/what he said he is.

Basic Training is the first taste of military life. As an adult, what do YOU know of having someone screaming in your face that you folded the towel wrong? Nothing. You know nothing about it. Folding a towel is not the same as shooting at a a man with a rifle, but at the very least, it exposes the person to the first step of military life.

So here is my recent technical post...

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/seco...ing-flight-tests.562627/page-12#post-10563819

Can any of you PDF Chinese produce something even halfway similar? Of course -- NOT.

My post does not involve killing anyone, but it does illuminate to the forum of one curious item about military aviation in general, of the F-35 in particular, and of fuel tanks in even more specific. My post answers questions.

YOU are free to try to convince others that I am wrong, but in your attempt to do so, you must back up your argument with even better technical sources and arguments. Can YOU do that? Of course -- NOT.

That is why @jhungary and I are more believable than any of you in this forum when it comes to military affairs. We do not need to reveal our IDs to secure our credibility.

YOU -- who have never tasted the Basic Training of your country's military because you are too cowardly to serve and yet you guys routinely talk tough of 'nuking' this country or that country. YOU are the typically despised 'keyboard warrior'.

 

[denel]

What is this thread even?

Glorification of murder of innocents and trying to make it some sort of movie-like heroic story telling?

You are/were just a savage who invaded another country that didn't attack you and killed people and even 'enjoyed' it....killing them with missiles, bullets, and as you put it--with knife.

@jhungary is sort of person that probably killed innocent Iraqi men, women, and children as 'sports' or raped little girls like many other of his compatriots/soldiers that fought besides him. Well, that's what you do when you are not fighting to defend your homeland but are just invading another people bc they are weak and can't defend themselves. Your inner barbarian kicks in.

But atleast you get to sugar coat it in threads like these to may be live with yourself better?

Digusting thread.

200% agreed. This is unbelievable that Moderators are not shutting this down.
@Horus @MastanKhan

 

[jhungary]

200% agreed. This is unbelievable that Moderators are not shutting this down.
@Horus @MastanKhan

That is because this thread have its value, it make people understood the psyche of what a man went through to kill another man. However it takes is up to you, of course you can turn it into a troll fest, in fact, you can turn anything into troll fest if you wanted.

Nobody is talking about killing another Muslim or anything disrespect to everyone, it's talking about the need to kill in war, any war are the same. Just this war I fought is with Iraqi and afghan insurgent.

Nobody is bragging about killing anyone here, if you failed to see it this way, then I cannot help you with that.

 

[denel]

That is because this thread have its value, it make people understood the psyche of what a man went through to kill another man. However it takes is up to you, of course you can turn it into a troll fest, in fact, you can turn anything into troll fest if you wanted.

Nobody is talking about killing another Muslim or anything disrespect to everyone, it's talking about the need to kill in war, any war are the same. Just this war I fought is with Iraqi and afghan insurgent.

Nobody is bragging about killing anyone here, if you failed to see it this way, then I cannot help you with that.

Sorry I fail to see any relevance of your post. I am from defence force myself and have seen several combat ops. This is not things you write or gloat about.

 

[jhungary]

Sorry I fail to see any relevance of your post. I am from defence force myself and have seen several combat ops. This is not things you write or gloat about.

If you say "Gloat", it means you don't understand the point of this thread.