What's new

What do you know about killing. (Part 2)

I wouldn't care less if anyone think I am BSing you, this is a public forum, not some NSA operation or something in that effect, BSing you or anyone here did not get me any advantage. I was not getting paid by this forum to express my view, I got absolutely no gain for pretending something that I am not.

Again, people believe I was in the military because the stuff that I say, and stuff that I discuss, not because I tell them I was a soldier.

Like I said, anyone can boast about anything on an anonymous internet forum.

You claim to have killed multiple people in combat, using a knife even. That is quite an incredible claim, all I did is ask if you have any proof that you were even a soldier to begin with, let alone killing multiple people in combat with knives or any other such close combat weapon.

If you claimed you could do 10 pushups, then sure that's easily believable. But killing multiple people in armed combat, with a knife? Anything other than the claim of an anonymous forum user for this? Next you will say you have killed people with your bare hands, wearing a blindfold, or something equally ludicrous.
 
.
Like I said, anyone can boast about anything on an anonymous internet forum.

You claim to have killed multiple people in combat, using a knife even. That is quite an incredible claim, all I did is ask if you have any proof that you were even a soldier to begin with, let alone killing multiple people in combat with knives or any other such close combat weapon.

If you claimed you could do 10 pushups, then sure that's easily believable. But killing multiple people in armed combat, with a knife? Anything other than the claim of an anonymous forum user for this? Next you will say you have killed people with your bare hands, wearing a blindfold, or something equally ludicrous.

lol, what I said is what I said, whether you believe or not.

I am not saying that to please you, you are nothing to me in this forum or in some sense, in my life.

Honestly, I don't care you don't believe that. Or anyone in this forum believe I am a veteran or not. That is not my goal here.

And if you want to further discuss the topic at hand, I am more than welcome, and if you want to debate whether or not I served in the military, then I will have to ask @Slav Defence to remove your post. You can open a thread and challenge me on my military service, I never back down from a fight, but this is NOT what we do here.

Here we discuss the psyche of a person to kill people, not whether you believe I kill before.
 
.
t felt good because it is an Accomplishment, you achieve something, either as a part of your objective, or simply you felt alive when you are nearly dead.

In war, I don't care who tell you whatever, your aim is to survive, and the end of a day, when you did and they don't, you felt happy and joy. Not because you like killing people, unlike a serial killer, but rather, it's something that you do and the consequence is instant.

People don't understand that when they were never fired at. The sort of adrenaline rush is there when you do, and that rush, is probably more additive than drug. And there are no other place to score, except in a battlefield.

I know each and every feeling, probably more if not less....

Some one has to face and fire the bullets, so that people who love peace can live peacefully without having there
conscience hunting them.
 
. .
The problem is that this is an anonymous forum, anyone can claim anything about themselves with zero proof.
Why did you accept my claim of being Vietnamese? I have provided no proof. And yet, you took it at face value.

Here is why you took my claim of being Vietnamese at face value: You are a racist.

You took my claim without proof because it serves your need to feel racially superior. You do not care about proof. As long as there is one more avenue for you to satisfy your racist need, you took my claim as is.

So now why do you insist on proof of a claim of surviving lethal combat?

Because we few veterans on this forum have the advantage over you on this military oriented forum. We do not insists on proof from each other as we speak a common language, one that you and your fellow Chinese would never be able to speak and understand. We can and have undercut many of your inane comments about military affairs. We risked our lives for our country while EACH of you are too cowardly to do even one term of basic enlistment to serve your country. So now all you are -- each of you -- is nothing more than the usually despised 'keyboard warrior'.

That is why you insists on proof. Not because you care about the integrity of this forum, but because you want to drag us down to your level of being that despised 'keyboard warrior' status.

@jhungary

I have read the testimonials of drone operators. I could simply write a piece claiming to be a drone operator after that, this is all public domain knowledge that anyone with a keyboard can access.
By all means -- GO FOR IT...!!! I dare ya...!!! :lol:

Create an alternate forum ID and pose as a UAV pilot.

But you will not because you are smart enough to know that you would be exposed toot-sweet. You maybe able to reorganize the words that other people wrote, but you will NEVER be able to convey their thoughts. There are no Chinese UAV pilots that have seen (remote) combat. That leave the experience of only the Americans, and you will be exposed as a fake American long before you are exposed as a fake UAV pilot.

Written words are fraught with dangers. Spoken words are transitory and most people have difficulties remembering in details what was said, how the words were said, and what the messenger was trying to convey. But written words -- they are treasure. Written words are preserved for examination.

See this 'Air Force' doofus here...???

ly1b8L7.jpg


To the laymen, he looks 'Air Force' enough. YOU would buy it. Because you are ignorant, and I say that kindly, of what a USAF dress uniform would look like. If he walks past you, you would not know he is a fraud. If he walks past me fast enough, I would not notice the details that would expose him as a fraud. I would probably miss the US Army Combat Infantryman rifle badge. But this pic is like the written words on paper. It is static and preserved for examination. Any USAF personnel, even on his/her first enlistment, would immediately know this guy is a fraud. The details are just too much once under the microscope.

So absolutely pose yourself as a USAF UAV pilot. Make others' experiences and words your own. See how long that will last...:enjoy:
 
.
Not because you care about the integrity of this forum, but because you want to drag us down to your level of being that despised 'keyboard warrior' status.

Without proof, aren't you a keyboard warrior just the same as everyone else?

Why did you accept my claim of being Vietnamese? I have provided no proof. And yet, you took it at face value.

Being Vietnamese isn't the same as having killed multiple people in combat with a knife, one is believable the other is wild boasting.
 
.
Without proof, aren't you a keyboard warrior just the same as everyone else?
Sure, YOU can call me that. Others have different opinions. It is up to you to convince them to your side. So far, you are losing. It is not enough for you to call me that label, for what I have posted so far regarding military issues, the burden is greater upon you now to disprove me. Good luck with that.

Being Vietnamese isn't the same as having killed multiple people in combat with a knife, one is believable the other is wild boasting.
That is not the point, which is proof.
 
.
Sure, YOU can call me that. Others have different opinions. It is up to you to convince them to your side. So far, you are losing. It is not enough for you to call me that label, for what I have posted so far regarding military issues, the burden is greater upon you now to disprove me. Good luck with that.

That's entirely wrong.

The burden of proof lies on the side that made the claim:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)

Now, I never claimed to be a soldier, or to have fought in war(s), or to have killed people in battle.

The burden of proof is on the person who made those claims. Especially when they start claiming wild things, such as having killed multiple people in war using a knife.
 
.
That's entirely wrong.

The burden of proof lies on the side that made the claim:
I provided no proof that I am Vietnamese, and yet, you accepted my claim. So now, your argument with those sources are essentially invalid.
 
.
I provided no proof that I am Vietnamese, and yet, you accepted my claim. So now, your argument with those sources are essentially invalid.

The claim that you are Vietnamese is no different to the claims of everyone else on this forum about their ethnicity or nationality. It's a given when you sign up on this forum to begin with.

What is different, is those keyboard warriors who make claims to be soldiers, to have been in wars and to have killed people. And then calling other people cowards for not claiming the same.

Now tell me this, which one is a keyboard warrior?

1) The anonymous forum user who claims to be a soldier, to have been in wars and to have killed people in battle... and then using this claim to call other people cowards for not having done the same....

OR...

2) The anonymous forum user who does not claim any of these things.

Which one is the keyboard warrior?
 
.
The claim that you are Vietnamese is no different to the claims of everyone else on this forum about their ethnicity or nationality. It's a given when you sign up on this forum to begin with.
That does not constitute proof. The fact that initially, you guys assumed that I was a white man means your argument is invalid. You demanded proof in one instance, but ignore for the next.

Which one is the keyboard warrior?
YOU are. No one is saying that you have to be in a war and actually killed people in order to be accepted. A 'keyboard warrior' is one who talks tough but never done anything, which is what you guys are.
 
.
YOU are. No one is saying that you have to be in a war and actually killed people in order to be accepted. A 'keyboard warrior' is one who talks tough but never done anything, which is what you guys are.

Firstly, when have I "talked tough"? Do you have any quotes from me to show this, or are you making things up as usual? Find a quote from me and post it.

You are the one claiming to be a soldier and to have fought in a war with absolutely zero proof, and then calling other people cowards for not having done the same. The very definition of a keyboard warrior. :lol:
 
. . .
What is this thread even?

Glorification of murder of innocents and trying to make it some sort of movie-like heroic story telling?

You are/were just a savage who invaded another country that didn't attack you and killed people and even 'enjoyed' it....killing them with missiles, bullets, and as you put it--with knife.

@jhungary is sort of person that probably killed innocent Iraqi men, women, and children as 'sports' or raped little girls like many other of his compatriots/soldiers that fought besides him. Well, that's what you do when you are not fighting to defend your homeland but are just invading another people bc they are weak and can't defend themselves. Your inner barbarian kicks in.

But atleast you get to sugar coat it in threads like these to may be live with yourself better? :lol:

Digusting thread.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom