Kinetic
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2010
- Messages
- 11,200
- Reaction score
- -33
What CPEC means for South Asia
- Thread starter Hephaestus
- Start date
mods time to lock thread
Qutb-ud-din Aybak
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 6,968
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
so you are helping terrorists against cpec because it is passing through azad kashmir and you call other countries terrorists.
Rajput_Pakistani
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2012
- Messages
- 1,149
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
1. CPEC is a "Trade Agreement" between 2 sovereign nations. Its not violating any international treaty or law. By trying to make it controversial or acting against it, India is exposing her true intentions towards its neighbors.
2. Its not a "Military alliance" against any country (for example 1971 defense pact between USSR and India, which was against Pakistan or recent bilateral agreements between USA and India, which are clearly against China. Similar defense agreements between Israel and India are clearly against Pakistan.
3. Most of the projects in CPEC are on BOT (built, operate, transfer) hence it should not be a headache to any country specially India. Its a bilateral agreement, whatever terms and conditions, we have agreed upon is non of your business.
4. Threatening politically, diplomatically and planning/conducting sabotage against an economic activity is an act of war.
5. If India unilaterally ends bilateral agreements like IWT, it will show the world India's reckless behavior. How will other nations trust India in their agreements? With what face India demands a permanent security council seat? (not to mention India has already violated security council resolutions on Kashmir, aggression against Hyderabad Deccan, illegal annexation of Sikkim, Junagarh and more..
So a sincere advise to Indians, dont interfere in others matter. You are not an authority in South Asia nor any country has given you such status.
2. Its not a "Military alliance" against any country (for example 1971 defense pact between USSR and India, which was against Pakistan or recent bilateral agreements between USA and India, which are clearly against China. Similar defense agreements between Israel and India are clearly against Pakistan.
3. Most of the projects in CPEC are on BOT (built, operate, transfer) hence it should not be a headache to any country specially India. Its a bilateral agreement, whatever terms and conditions, we have agreed upon is non of your business.
4. Threatening politically, diplomatically and planning/conducting sabotage against an economic activity is an act of war.
5. If India unilaterally ends bilateral agreements like IWT, it will show the world India's reckless behavior. How will other nations trust India in their agreements? With what face India demands a permanent security council seat? (not to mention India has already violated security council resolutions on Kashmir, aggression against Hyderabad Deccan, illegal annexation of Sikkim, Junagarh and more..
So a sincere advise to Indians, dont interfere in others matter. You are not an authority in South Asia nor any country has given you such status.
Hammad Arshad Qureshi
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2016
- Messages
- 1,161
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
The blaim completely lies on Indian and it's racist ideology to put Pakistan and Pakistani down. They always wanted to Control and humiliate Pakistan like they wish since. Which Pakistan obviously resisted against. Even our founding father Mohammed Ali Jinnah wanted the relationship between Pakistan and India to be same as USA and Canada. But India and its racist ideology turned this idea down
Similar threads
- Article
