What's new

What conspiracy? Lawyer hits China's reaction to arbitration verdict

The United Nations Convention for Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) was signed in 1982 and came into effect in 1994. The actual UN body that oversees the implementation and enforcement of UNCLOS is the International Tribunal for Law of the Sea (ITLOS), located in Hamburg, Germany. This "Permanent Court of Arbitration" is a kangaroo court located in Hague, which rents the same building as the UN International Court of Justice in order to give it some false authority. It has no jurisdiction whatsoever to issue judgement on a UN convention as it is not in any way, shape or form affiliated with United Nations.

There was an idiot the other day trying to argue that this kangaroo court was "in spirit" part of UN. In that case, I'm "in spirit" the lifelong dictator of Mars. It's all smoke and mirrors to give an ignorant public that this arbitration is somehow authoritative and binding because it is "international". Here is a fun fact. Nobody has ever obeyed any ruling from this clown show in the 17 cases that was brought to it.
 
.
embarrassment? where is it? why can I feel it? why not send some sanctions, if you can? only word that is cheap, please do some action to make us feel embarrassed.

LOL..Not every arbitration follows a "Sanction",rather diplomatic implications.

Find you indian very like "represent" for the "World", and like saying"in fact" hehe, you really think you are somthing, don't drink too much the G........ water, and make much daydream :coffee:

Posted the news,and showed Chinese what they are.Nothing else.

That China Daily info graph is stupid, I agree. I disagree however about the embarrassment, where? To be embarrassed you would have to be caught off guard. China already know before the arbitration began that it was going to be bias and in favor of PH, that is why China said it would not agree to whatever outcome from the US-controlled court.

It's over, nothing happened, nothing changed, Philippines got their pat on the head and loss 30 million dollars to US lawyers fees.

But I don't think its more embarrassing than India's attempt at the NSG though.

Not exactly bias as China didn't offer much proof for its claim.Claiming "SCS is ours as it was our forefathers" is like Mongolia claiming China using same logic.Null and Void.
 
.
LOL..Not every arbitration follows a "Sanction",rather diplomatic implications.



Posted the news,and showed Chinese what they are.Nothing else.

I just came back from an "international tribunal". The street bum acting as judge says Kashmir rightfully belongs to Pakistan and India must face "international" repercussions. I paid him $2 dollars for his services and showed him where Kashmir is on the map.

It's just as good as this PCA kangaroo court. Basically Philippines did the same thing.
 
Last edited:
.
How did the case help China?
The thing is, the Philippines could have got a deal with China to co-develop the islands and reap the benefits in the resource rich areas. But they wanted the cake all to themselves.
Now they got nothing.
Even just before the verdict, China had asked the Philippines again to reconsider, but the loyal US dog rejected China's offer.
At this point of time, China will surely not extend the offer anymore, unless their master is willing to go to war against China and in my opinion it is very unforeseeable.
 
.
Ordinary Chinese react by making SCS Arbitration Brand the best-selling toilet paper :rofl::D

toiletpaper.jpg


There are 100 and 1 ways to make money out of something.
 
. . .
In exposing the flimsiness of China’s claims, Justice Carpio had this to say: “China officially notified the world of its 9-dashed line claim only in 2009 when China submitted the 9-dashed line map to the United Nations Secretary General. Not a single country in the world recognizes, respects, tolerates or acquiesces to China’s 9-dashed line claim. China has never effectively enforced its 9-dashed line claim from the time of China’s domestic release of its 9-dashed line map in 1947 up to 1994 when UNCLOS took effect, and even after 1994 up to the present."

“Thus, under the general principles and rules of international law, China cannot claim any “historical right” that pre-dated UNCLOS. Even assuming, for the sake of argument, that China has such “historical right,” the entry into force of UNCLOS in 1994 extinguished such right.”.,

Nine-dashed-line-South-China-Sea.jpg
 
.
That lawyer argument is not very convincing. Nobody gives an arbitration court the authority to decide territorial dispute.
 
.
Terrorist tribunal and terrorist judges will be served justiced by our armed drones. This terrorist attack only serves to strengthen our resolve and give us justification to kill more enemies.
 
.
so, where is the embarrassment? can you feel that?

Its Chinese people who should feel,not Indians.But only if they have left with some dignity..

I just came back from an "international tribunal". The street bum acting as judge says Kashmir rightfully belongs to Pakistan and India must face "international" repercussions. I paid him $2 dollars for his services and showed him where Kashmir is on the map.

It's just as good as this PCA kangaroo court. Basically Philippines did the same thing.

And someone argues why Chinese trolls shouldn't be banned. :lol:
 
.
Its Chinese people who should feel,not Indians.But only if they have left with some dignity..
It is our pride to deny that toilet paper like the US done in 1980‘s Nicaragua case. by the way, we are waiting for sanction from you guys.
 
.
What would you expect from a lawyer, who milked Manila dry.? He would be looking at making more money and increase his brand. China bashing sells! He might write a book and give paid speeches.

Can someone just stop the spread of these silly wasteful threads or please, make a dedicated section where China haters can do their act and leave the rest of this section productive?

You can call it China Basher's Café.

Utterly tiring this.

People should be asking: How can we develop and raise the quality of life our citizens.
Even if there was no China these countries would still have to solve their problems.
 
.
It is our pride to deny that toilet paper like the US done in 1980‘s Nicaragua case. by the way, we are waiting for sanction from you guys.

Because USA never ratified UNCLOS.Not the same with China.

Wow,the eunuch is more anxious than the emperor.
Even your master,US,have downplayed this incident.
Who care a servant's nagging?
Pay attention to your own place,india is not the player in this dispute.

Post reported.Happy ban time.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom