SR 71 Blackbird
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2011
- Messages
- 793
- Reaction score
- 0
You seriously think that US is going to sell the B-2.Besides they are very very costly to operate.I'd rather have 6-7 B-2's for SFC.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You seriously think that US is going to sell the B-2.Besides they are very very costly to operate.I'd rather have 6-7 B-2's for SFC.
You seriously think that US is going to sell the B-2.Besides they are very very costly to operate.
Well we can approach them and try our luck.
As far as cost is concerned, I'm only talking about a handful of them and it's not like they will be in active service.
They will be in the hangars most of the time and used only when needed.
Well we can approach them and try our luck.
As far as cost is concerned, I'm only talking about a handful of them and it's not like they will be in active service.
They will be in the hangars most of the time and used only when needed.
Well we can approach them and try our luck.
As far as cost is concerned, I'm only talking about a handful of them and it's not like they will be in active service.
They will be in the hangars most of the time and used only when needed.
Count me in the Su-34 group.
Has Russia offered SU-35 to India?
I am more interested in aircraft with least RCS whether it is Su-35
or Su-34
Here's the toilet onboard Su-34.
Su-35 has less radar cross section among these.
SFC has to operate a plane that is maintained by IAF.
IAF has time and again said that they plan to reduce the diversity in their fleet.
Going for Su-34/35 is sheer madness. Just add the MMRCA numbers to account for 40 fighters for SFC.
Buying something is one thing, creating a credible support infrastructure is quite another.
I am more interested in aircraft with least RCS whether it is Su-35
or Su-34
Su-35 has less radar cross section among these.