I dont know why you want to go back in time and compare Iranian and Turkic sunni dynasties to todays Shia Islamic republic. The turks started to fight against persians, not other way around. As i said I agree with you sunnism is a violent religion (starting from rashidun caliphates, followed by umayads and abbasids) and we witness it in different movements and different countries, like a virus it affected Iranics and Turkics in the 1000 years ago. Borders and nations don't discriminate when it comes to actions of sunni muslims. And it's positive that that ISIS wants to revive sunnism instead. It's like watching a theatre/show of history of sunnism.
However when talking about the recent history of Iran (past 300-400 years) and how they influenced todays ruling system of Iran, we see clearly that the safavids and qajars played a big role in empowerment of shia clerics, while the zand dynasty reduced them to ordinary citizens. In this every historian agrees, so who are you to disagree with this? And this is the topic here, about qajars weakening Iran, so don't go off-topic.
How is islamic republic pro-Iranian if we see that turks like Khalkhali wanted to destroy persepolis and executed thousands of prisoners and that turks like khamenei oppress Iranian people. Even khomeini was a recent imported mullah from india, just like how safavids and qajar imported mullahs to Iran to empower shia religion. His family name was khomeini
hendizadeh.
Islamic republic clearly has a anti-Iranian ideology rooted in communism and MB ikhwan islamism. They also have no problems with pan-turkism and baathism as long as it doesnt affect the position of islamic republic. But harmless attacks on Iranian history and culture by these elements are tolerated by islamic republic.
The recent anti-Persian-sentiment by pan-Turkish are organized smoothly in Tractor FC–owned and managed by Revolutionary Guards– games. Mr. Nasser Pourpirar has openly questioned Iranian Identity, but his website is not filtered in Iran and even he publishes/sales his books in Tehran (Daneshga Tehran).
Basically most of these people (anti-Iranian identity) have common background–all of them have tendency to ultra-Islamic mixed with Marxism. People like Pourpirar Dr. Chamran and Zehtabi after successful dissolving of Iranian-Azerbaijan-Rep in 1946, and years later left Iran to Iraq, Libya, Syria and Egypt (1958-1970), there under Baathist regimes, they learned Arabic and Pan-Arabic ideology. After 1979 revolution because they were just cable of “translating Qhoran” only they easily infiltrated into new-Iranian-government and basically they shaped/influence heavily Iranian Foreign policy– as ultimate anti American, anti-Israeli & anti western in the region.
Read more here:
The Extreme Religious Right and the Muslim Brotherhood | Kaveh Farrokh
Opportunistic Elements with the Iranian Establishment | Kaveh Farrokh
The Iranian Left and Tudeh Communist Party | Kaveh Farrokh
The op insulted his great grandfather, so he is a bit emotional.
