Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zia killed no body and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was technically not qualified to be called as elected.Zia who killed elected PM of Pakistan for his own survival ? .
The westerners tried each bit to stop Asians from getting their hands on nukes, but we have them now, everyone may not agree but even MOSAAD and CIA both actively were snooping on indian and Pakistani programs.....Not really the subject matter but don't tell me it was Pakistan killing your scientists..!
No thanks for the mean intro... i can also tell you are a piece of garbage etc...
I can't believe reason of your mean titles was that i praised Zia ul Haq!!! man your are filled with special matter you may be above the law on this forum but i wish you were face to face with me... i'm sure it will not take much effort to make you change your aopinion about me.
No go read the book i gave reference below and counter all counts given therein.
http://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=21098
Thanks for the linkAny one interested to learn more about the development of Pakistan's nuclear technology, should read book titled 'eating grass'
http://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=21098
I beg to differ if you weigh some one on its pros and cons .Zia did more damaged to Pak then good ,obviously my personnel opinionThat was indeed funny but ironically explains the whole situation in summary.
Other aspect which you would notice from this video is that Zia was cool headed.
All attempts to provoke him failed and he didn't lost focus of his mission.
He was simply the best Pakistan ever had.
The way you control a country is not by one institution but by controlling all the institutions - Military, Political and Judiciary.
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (ZAB) was too popular with the common people of Pakistan and was called Quaid-i-Awam .
He followed socialist policies and was close to USSR just like Indira Gandhi was in India.
ZAB was instrumental in initiating the Pakistan nuclear weapons program in 1972 when he advised the Chairman of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) Munir Ahmad Khan with a commitment to have the bomb ready by the end of 1976. Later when PAEC was falling behind schedule and having considerable difficulty producing fissile material, ZAB brought in Abdul Qadeer Khan from Europe in 1974.
Through the implementation of "Nationalization and Economic Reforms Order (NERO)", ZAB nationalized all major metal industries, including iron and steel, heavy engineering, heavy electrical, petrochemicals, cement and public utilities.
The Sharif family were financially devastated after the family's steel business was nationalized by ZAB and they went into a alliance with the Military.
Eliminating Bhutto paved the way for Pakistan Military's brain child Nawaz Sharif to takeover the political institution.
There is a reason why Nawaz was left scot-free after the military coup against him in 1999 and why no action would be taken against him by Raheel Sharif in spite of his name popping out in the panama leaks.
View attachment 337937
Thanks for the link
I beg to differ if you weigh some one on its pros and cons .Zia did more damaged to Pak then good ,obviously my personnel opinion
The westerners tried each bit to stop Asians from getting their hands on nukes, but we have them now, everyone may not agree but even MOSAAD and CIA both actively were snooping on indian and Pakistani programs.....
It is the Western nations that dont want Kashmir issue to solve, the day it gets solved.....
They will loose big market of arms.....
Guys what after Kashmir issue?
Asian war against US dominance??
However, when you are trying to convince someone in discussion you need to giveout more than opinin.
for the red part.... are you for real?
Actually Pervez Musharraf told us that it was US who was backing Benazir and provoking her to come to Pakistan on certain time.
While Asif Ali Zardari's foreign minister (Qureshi) is on record saying that Zardari was conspiring to role back Pakistan's nuclear program, there are also rumors in PAF that Zardari also tried to role back JF-17 programm, which was later attacked by TTP
Why would son in law or daughter attempt to sabotage the biggest effort of her father? dosn't make sense!
Now if bomb was built by Bhutto than why US blame it on Zia ul Haq and had him killed!
Please see the video in OP is not a Q&A to Bhutto it is Zia being held responsible.
The westerners tried each bit to stop Asians from getting their hands on nukes, but we have them now, everyone may not agree but even MOSAAD and CIA both actively were snooping on indian and Pakistani programs.....
It is the Western nations that dont want Kashmir issue to solve, the day it gets solved.....
They will loose big market of arms.....
Guys what after Kashmir issue?
Asian war against US dominance??
View attachment 337961 View attachment 337962 View attachment 337959 View attachment 337962 CH]
Old photo belonging to my family. General Zia Ul Haq (May Allah accept him as shaheed) in the middle. He was a legend, period. People with no knowledge about the man should shut their mouth.
New Recruit
I don't exactly know. In the 80's i guess.What year was this taken
Was he? Can you give me some links to read about that?
.
Lol iam the worst.....for the red part.... are you for real?
Actually Pervez Musharraf told us that it was US who was backing Benazir and provoking her to come to Pakistan on certain time.
While Asif Ali Zardari's foreign minister (Qureshi) is on record saying that Zardari was conspiring to role back Pakistan's nuclear program, there are also rumors in PAF that Zardari also tried to role back JF-17 programm, which was later attacked by TTP
Why would son in law or daughter attempt to sabotage the biggest effort of her father? dosn't make sense!
Now if bomb was built by Bhutto than why US blame it on Zia ul Haq and had him killed!
Please see the video in OP is not a Q&A to Bhutto it is Zia being held responsible.
You may differ no problem with that.. and i'm all fine with your opinin.
However, when you are trying to convince someone in discussion you need to giveout more than opinin.
India need more of your type. How sweet...