Was Jinnah secular?

[F86 Saber]

I'm sorry i don't get your point....Are you saying that Quaid-e-Azam actually split a Muslim country?

A man who struggled all his live to get a sperate state where Muslims would be in majority cannot be a "Ladeen". He was heavily opposed by mullahs of those days labelling him as "Kafir", these are the same Mullah's who have now become the "Mama Chaha's" of Pakistan and consider themselves the saviors of Pakistan against the "Kafirs".

 

[Myth_buster_1]

I'm sorry i don't get your point....Are you saying that Quaid-e-Azam actually split a Muslim country?

A man who struggled all his live to get a sperate state where Muslims would be in majority cannot be a "Ladeen". He was heavily opposed by mullahs of those days labelling him as "Kafir", these are the same Mullah's who have now become the "Mama Chaha's" of Pakistan and consider themselves the saviors of Pakistan against the "Kafirs".

Why is that every Muslim who opposes Jinnah has to be associated with Mullah scums? Is it mere ignorance or what?
Correction, Jinnah did not spend his whole life struggling for a separate Muslim state. His early political career was based on united India and in fact Jinnah was more influenced by Freemasons such as Dadabhai Naoroji, Pherozeshah Mehta, Annie Besant, and British liberalist William Gladstone and John Morley. I believe only in 1930s when he joined all India Muslim league only then he was interested in separate Muslim state. And heck, even All India Muslim League was infested by freemasonry as the founder of this league was a freemason himself "Aga Khan" who was a British loyalist.