What's new

Was India Ever a Rich Country in its History?

india only thrived under the Islamic rule. For about 1000+ year, Islamosphere remained the most dominant superpower of the globe..like U.S was in 1990's or British in 19th century etc. It was only after Islamic take-over that india found stability, organization, effective tax-collection system crafted by Akbar and so on.

Before that, india was usually bunch of hindu kindgoms invading and killing each other.

Even today, Islamic World vastly outperforms india in almost every aspect...
--
plese educate your self..
british did not came here because india was poor ....it was goldmine...
islamosphere was dominant force but lost in transition..
only known diamond mine was in in INDIA ONLY...
Temple was expression of wealth and power in ancient india
that why somnath temple was looted and destroyed less on religious grown more on wealth and power projection...
still in temple in kerala tons of gold lying and till recent times no one was known about it ..
Islamic rule is partly true.... it was religion of rulers not the people..
except aurangazeb and may be few others NO MUGHAL ruler imposed it on
Mughal made few admin improvement and it was period india grew..
but not ONLY DUE TO THEM,..
China and India trading since harapan and vedic civilisation...
vedic civilisation of india was much more egalitarian, forward in science and tech ..like aryabhata , panini,

"Baudhayana (c. 8th century BCE) composed the Baudhayana Sulba Sutra, which contains examples of simple Pythagorean triples, such as:
df877d722b190f02a61b9a24fa516961.png
,
ecbff20f21177efc537d622b491f6a2c.png
,
1dd56a4e9211821693174a56c4353624.png
, , and
a1f4b33ca5e6c18705d5e119bf835fa1.png
[21] as well as a statement of the Pythagorean theorem "

to name a few.....
and mr. haq taking PER CAPITA trade and indian subcontinet specaily indian had large .. even very large family
Mr.Lalu yadav today have 9 kids think about in ancient time .
so think about if denominator is so large then what would be the size of economy we talking about
 
.
india only thrived under the Islamic rule. For about 1000+ year, Islamosphere remained the most dominant superpower of the globe..like U.S was in 1990's or British in 19th century etc. It was only after Islamic take-over that india found stability, organization, effective tax-collection system crafted by Akbar and so on.

Before that, india was usually bunch of hindu kindgoms invading and killing each other.

Even today, Islamic World vastly outperforms india in almost every aspect...


images


The Mauryan Empire was the first major empire in the history of India, ruled by Maurya dynasty from 321 BC to 185 BCE.
At that time, Magadh was ruled by the Nanda dynasty. Chanakya, also known as Kautilya was a pious, learned and determined brahman, who didn’t have a pleasant appearance but had an intelligent brain. He managed to terminate the existing King Mahapadm Nand and his eight sons and made Chandragupt the King of Magadh who was also the legitimate heir of the throne. Chandragupta founded the Mauryan Empire by overthrowing the Nanda dynasty with the help of Chanakya who was an important minister in the court of the Nanda rulers. Chanakya was ill treated by the Nanda king and he vowed to destroy their kingdom. He met the young Chandragupta in the Vindhya forest. Chanakya was well versed in politics and the affairs of the state. He groomed Chandragupta and helped him raise and organize an army. Thus, with the help of Chanakya, Chandragupta overthrew the last Nanda ruler and became the king and Chanakya became the chief minister in his court.

Important rulers of this dynasty were Chandragupta Maurya, Bindusara, and King Ashoka. This empire reached its peak under King Ashoka. However, this mighty empire crumbled rapidly, under its own weight, soon after the death of Ashoka.

Origin:
Maurya Empire was originated from the kingdom of Magadha in the Indo-Gangetic plains which is currently a part of modern Bihar, eastern Uttar Pradesh and Bengal (eastern side). It was ruled through the capital Patliputra (modern Patna).

Chandragupta Maurya was the founder of the dynasty (322 BC) who had overthrown the Nanda Dynasty and rapidly expanded his power westwards across central and western India by taking advantage of the disruptions of local powers in the wake of the withdrawal westward by Alexander the Great’s Greek and Persian armies. By 320 BC the empire had fully occupied Northwestern India, defeating and conquering the satraps left by Alexander.

It was one of the largest empires to rule the Indian subcontinent, stretched to the north along the natural boundaries of the Himalayas, and to the east stretching into what is now Assam. To the west, it reached beyond modern Pakistan, annexing Balochistan and much of what is now Afghanistan, including the modern Herat and Kandahar provinces.

Maurya Dynasty:
Magadh was the fourth dynasty after the Mahabharat war (3139 BC). Chandragupt Maurya was the first king and founder of the Maurya dynasty. His mother’s name was Mur, so he was called Maurya in Sanskrit which means the son of Mur, and thus, his dynasty was called Maurya dynasty.

Some bramhanical texts, like the ‘Puranas’ consider him from a lower (Shudra) caste, there are the Buddhist and Jain texts which speak of him as a member of the ‘Kshatriya’ (warrior)’ Moriya’ clan related to the ‘Shakyas’.

Another story known about Chandragupta was the son of king Mahanandin and Mura, and whose second wife Sunanda was the mother of the Nandas. Apparently with the help of a barber, Mahapadmananda she murdered her husband and Chandraguptas brothers and installed Mahapadmananda as the king. Mura escaped with her young son, who grew up and swore revenge.

Also another source calls Chandragupta’s father a commander to Mahapadmananda’s forces, whom Mahapadmananda had murdered by deceit.

Some texts have called Chandragupta a grandson of a headman of a village of peacock tanners, while some (‘Vishnu purana’ and the play ‘Mudrarakshasa’) refer to him as the illegitimate son of the woman named Mora and a Nanda prince (incidently the puranas also refer to the Nandas as offsprings of low birth).

However the most popular version holding fort is that, Chandragupta belonged to a ‘kshatriya’ (warrior) clan called ‘Moriya’, originally ruling, ‘Pipallivana’(Uttar Pradesh), a forest kingdom.

Literature:
Most of our knowledge about the Mauryan period in general and the rule of Chandragupta in particular is obtained from two important literary sources: the Arthashastra, written by Chanakya, and Indica, written by the ancient Greek writer Megasthenes (who was an ambassador of Seleucus Nikator and had come to the court of Chandragupta).

Chandragupta's minister Kautilya Chanakya wrote the Arthashastra, one of the greatest treatises on economics, politics, foreign affairs, administration, military arts, war, and religion ever produced in the India. Archaeologically, the period of Mauryan rule in South Asia falls into the era of Northern Black Polished Ware (NBPW). The Arthashastra and the Edicts of Ashoka are primary sources of written records of the Mauryan times. The Mauryan Empire is considered one of the most significant periods in Indian history. The Lion Capital of Asoka at Sarnath, is the emblem of India.

The Arthashastra talks about the principles of governance and lays down rules of administration. It also discusses in detail the role of the king, his duties, rate of taxation, use of espionage, and laws for governing the society. The Indica of Megasthenes, on the other hand, gives a vivid description of the Mauryan society under the rule of Chandragupta. Megasthenes described the glory of the Mauryan capital of Pataliputra. He also talked of the lifestyle in the cities and villages and the prosperity of the Mauryan cities.


Square silver coins issued between 321 and 181 BC in ancient India by the Mauryan Empire, which was created after the death of Alexander the GreatAdministration:
Chandragupta had united the whole of northern India under one rule. Mauryan Empire was the first large, powerful, centralized state in India. The Arthashastra laid the foundation of the centralized administration of Mauryan governance. The empire was divided into administrative districts or zones, each of which had a hierarchy of officials. The top most officers from these districts or zones directly reported to the Mauryan ruler. These officials were responsible for collecting taxes, maintaining the army, completing irrigational projects, and maintaining law and order.

During Chandragupta reign, the state regulated trade, levied taxes, and standardized weights and measures. Trade and commerce also flourished during this time. The state was responsible for providing irrigational facilities, succor, sanitation, and famine relief to its masses. Megasthenes, in his writings, has praised the efficient Mauryan administration.

Before the Kalinga war, the Mauryan administration under Ashoka was not different from that of his predecessors. Ashoka, like previous Mauryan kings, was at the head of the centralized administrative system. He was helped by a council of ministers that was in charge of different ministries like taxation, army, agriculture, justice, etc. The empire was divided into administrative zones, each one having its hierarchy of officials. The top most officers at the zonal level had to keep in touch with the king. These officers took care of all aspects of administration (social welfare, economy, law and order, military) in the different zones. The official ladder went down to the village level.

Religion:
Emperor Chandragupta Maurya became the first major Indian monarch to initiate a religious transformation at the highest level when he embraced Jainism, a religious movement resented by orthodox Hin dupriests that usually attended the imperial court. At an older age, Chandragupta renounced his throne and material possessions to join a wandering group of Jain monks. However his successor, Emperor Bindusara preserved Hindu traditions and distanced himself from Jain and Buddhist movements.

But when Ashoka embraced Buddhism following the Kalinga War, he renounced expansionism and aggression, and the harsher injunctions of the Arthashastra on the employ of force, intensive policing and ruthless measures for tax collection and against rebels. Ashoka sent a mission led by his son and daughter to Sri Lanka, whose king Tissa was so charmed with Buddhist ideals that he adopted it himself and made it the state religion. Ashoka sent many Buddhist missions to West Asia, Greece and South East Asia, and commissioned the construction of monasteries, schools and publication of Buddhist literature across the empire. He is believed to have built as many as 84,000 stupas across India, and increased the popularity of Buddhism in Afghanistan. Ashoka helped convene the Third Buddhist Council near his capital, that undertook much work of reform and expansion of the Buddhist religion.

While himself a Buddhist, Ashoka retained the membership of Hindu priests and ministers in his court, and maintained religious freedom and tolerance, although the Buddhist faith grew in popularity with his patronage. Indian society began embracing the philosophy of ahimsa, and given the prosperity and law enforcement, crime and internal conflicts reduced dramatically. Also greatly discouraged was the caste system and orthodox discrimination, as Hinduism began inculcating the ideals and values of Jain and Buddhist teachings. Social freedom began expanding in an age of peace and prosperity.

Economy:
Mauryans implemented a common economic system and enhanced trade and commerce, with increased agricultural productivity under the able guidance of Chanakya. Hundreds of earlier kingdoms, many small armies, powerful regional chieftains, and internecine warfare, gave way to this disciplined central authority. Like in Arthashastra (by Kautilya)said, the king was the supreme head of the state. His duty was mainly ensuring the welfare and happiness of his subjects. He was to work almost 18-19 hours a day and was to be at the service of his people, courtiers, and officers any time of the hour. The country prospered during Mauryan rule.

The Council of ministers consisted of 3-12 members, each being the head of a department. Then there was the State council which could have 12,16 or 20 members. Besides, there was the bureaucracy consisting of the ‘Sannidhata’ (treasury head), ‘Samaharta’ (chief revenue collector), ‘Purohita’ (head priest),’Senapati’(commander of the army),’ Pratihara’ (chief of the palace guards),’Antarvamisika’ (head of the harem guards),’Durgapala’(governor of the fort), ‘Antahala’ (governor of the frontier),’Paur’(governor of the capital),’Nyayadhisha’ (chief justice),’Prasasta’ (police chief). Then there were the ‘Tirthas’, ‘Amatyas’ i.e officers in charge of accounts (controlled by the chief minister‘Mahaamatya’) of the: treasury, records, mines, mints, commerce, excise agriculture, toll, public utility, armory etc.

The governors or viceroys of provinces were called ‘Mahamatras’ and if the designation was held by a prince then he was called ‘Kumara mahamatra’. Assisting them were the ‘Yutas’ (tax collectors), ‘Rajukas’(revenue collectors),’Sthanikas’ and’Gopas’(district officers). Then there was the local village head called’ Gramika’ under whom the village assembly operated.
The civil courts were called ‘Dharmasthiya’ and criminal courts were called ‘Kantakshodhana’.
An international network of trade expanded during Ashoka's reign under the Indo-Greek friendship treaty. Like the Khyber pass, on the boundary of Pakistan and Afghanistan became important port of trade and intercourse with the outside world. Greek states and Hellenic kingdoms in West Asia became important trade partners of India. Trade also extended through the Malay peninsula into Southeast Asia. India's exports included silk goods and textiles, spices and exotic foods. The Empire was enriched further with an exchange of scientific knowledge and technology with Europe and West Asia. Ashoka also sponsored the construction of thousands of roads, waterways, canals, hospitals, rest-houses and other public works. The easing of many overly-rigorous administrative practices, including those regarding taxation and crop collection, helped increase productivity and economic activity across the Empire. In many ways, the economic situation in the Maurya Empire is comparable to the Roman Empire several centuries later, which both had extensive trade connections and both had organizations similar to corporations.

Architectures:
Fourteen Rock Edicts found at eight different places which are. Shahbazgarhi (seventh edict engraved on a bowl ,Peshawar, Pakistan presently displayed in the Prince of Wales museum, Mumbai),Manshera (Hazara),Kalsi (Dehradun, Uttarakhand),Girnar (Junagadh, Gujrat),Sopara(Thana, Maharashtra), Dhauli and Jaugada(Orissa) and erragudi(Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh). Minor Rock Edicts found at thirteen different places which are. Roopnath(Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh), Bairat(Jaipur, Rajasthan), Sasaram(Shahbad district, Bihar), Maski (Raichur, Karnataka), Gavimath and Palkigundu(Mysore, Karnataka), Gujarra(Datia district , Madhya Pradesh), Ahraura (Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh), Rajulamandagiri (Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh), Yerragudi and three neighbouring places in Chitaldurga district, Mysore. Seven Pillar Edicts found on a single pillar (Topra, presently displayed in Delhi).Rest were found in northern Bihar. The remaining inscriptions were engraved on rocks, pillars and cave walls.

The most important of these being the engravings on a pillar found at Rumindei (Nepal) which mentions Ashoka’s visit to the birthplace of Gautam Buddha at Lumbini. Two short inscriptions written in Aramaic have also been found at Taxilla and Jalalabad(Afghanistan). A bilingual inscription written in Greek and Aramaic has been found on a rock at Shar-i-Kuna(Kandahar, Afghanistan). Four edicts (one in Kharoshti script derived from Aramaic, used in Iran and others in perhaps, Prakrit, rest found in the country being in Brahmi) have been found in Shalatak and Qargha (Afghanistan).

The thirteenth rock edict gives a vivid account of Ashokas conquest of Kalinga (260 BC), after a prolonged war, in which 1,50,000 persons were captured, 1,00,000 killed and many times that number perished. Ashoka was said to have been filled with great remorse and guilt after witnessing the misery and bloodshed his war cost.


https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&r...Zw_o6bg-m_wqGK1I1uWQl1A&bvm=bv.62286460,d.bmk
 
.
images


The Mauryan Empire was the first major empire in the history of India, ruled by Maurya dynasty from 321 BC to 185 BCE.
At that time, Magadh was ruled by the Nanda dynasty. Chanakya, also known as Kautilya was a pious, learned and determined brahman, who didn’t have a pleasant appearance but had an intelligent brain. He managed to terminate the existing King Mahapadm Nand and his eight sons and made Chandragupt the King of Magadh who was also the legitimate heir of the throne. Chandragupta founded the Mauryan Empire by overthrowing the Nanda dynasty with the help of Chanakya who was an important minister in the court of the Nanda rulers. Chanakya was ill treated by the Nanda king and he vowed to destroy their kingdom. He met the young Chandragupta in the Vindhya forest. Chanakya was well versed in politics and the affairs of the state. He groomed Chandragupta and helped him raise and organize an army. Thus, with the help of Chanakya, Chandragupta overthrew the last Nanda ruler and became the king and Chanakya became the chief minister in his court.

Important rulers of this dynasty were Chandragupta Maurya, Bindusara, and King Ashoka. This empire reached its peak under King Ashoka. However, this mighty empire crumbled rapidly, under its own weight, soon after the death of Ashoka.

Origin:
Maurya Empire was originated from the kingdom of Magadha in the Indo-Gangetic plains which is currently a part of modern Bihar, eastern Uttar Pradesh and Bengal (eastern side). It was ruled through the capital Patliputra (modern Patna).

Chandragupta Maurya was the founder of the dynasty (322 BC) who had overthrown the Nanda Dynasty and rapidly expanded his power westwards across central and western India by taking advantage of the disruptions of local powers in the wake of the withdrawal westward by Alexander the Great’s Greek and Persian armies. By 320 BC the empire had fully occupied Northwestern India, defeating and conquering the satraps left by Alexander.

It was one of the largest empires to rule the Indian subcontinent, stretched to the north along the natural boundaries of the Himalayas, and to the east stretching into what is now Assam. To the west, it reached beyond modern Pakistan, annexing Balochistan and much of what is now Afghanistan, including the modern Herat and Kandahar provinces.

Maurya Dynasty:
Magadh was the fourth dynasty after the Mahabharat war (3139 BC). Chandragupt Maurya was the first king and founder of the Maurya dynasty. His mother’s name was Mur, so he was called Maurya in Sanskrit which means the son of Mur, and thus, his dynasty was called Maurya dynasty.

Some bramhanical texts, like the ‘Puranas’ consider him from a lower (Shudra) caste, there are the Buddhist and Jain texts which speak of him as a member of the ‘Kshatriya’ (warrior)’ Moriya’ clan related to the ‘Shakyas’.

Another story known about Chandragupta was the son of king Mahanandin and Mura, and whose second wife Sunanda was the mother of the Nandas. Apparently with the help of a barber, Mahapadmananda she murdered her husband and Chandraguptas brothers and installed Mahapadmananda as the king. Mura escaped with her young son, who grew up and swore revenge.

Also another source calls Chandragupta’s father a commander to Mahapadmananda’s forces, whom Mahapadmananda had murdered by deceit.

Some texts have called Chandragupta a grandson of a headman of a village of peacock tanners, while some (‘Vishnu purana’ and the play ‘Mudrarakshasa’) refer to him as the illegitimate son of the woman named Mora and a Nanda prince (incidently the puranas also refer to the Nandas as offsprings of low birth).

However the most popular version holding fort is that, Chandragupta belonged to a ‘kshatriya’ (warrior) clan called ‘Moriya’, originally ruling, ‘Pipallivana’(Uttar Pradesh), a forest kingdom.

Literature:
Most of our knowledge about the Mauryan period in general and the rule of Chandragupta in particular is obtained from two important literary sources: the Arthashastra, written by Chanakya, and Indica, written by the ancient Greek writer Megasthenes (who was an ambassador of Seleucus Nikator and had come to the court of Chandragupta).

Chandragupta's minister Kautilya Chanakya wrote the Arthashastra, one of the greatest treatises on economics, politics, foreign affairs, administration, military arts, war, and religion ever produced in the India. Archaeologically, the period of Mauryan rule in South Asia falls into the era of Northern Black Polished Ware (NBPW). The Arthashastra and the Edicts of Ashoka are primary sources of written records of the Mauryan times. The Mauryan Empire is considered one of the most significant periods in Indian history. The Lion Capital of Asoka at Sarnath, is the emblem of India.

The Arthashastra talks about the principles of governance and lays down rules of administration. It also discusses in detail the role of the king, his duties, rate of taxation, use of espionage, and laws for governing the society. The Indica of Megasthenes, on the other hand, gives a vivid description of the Mauryan society under the rule of Chandragupta. Megasthenes described the glory of the Mauryan capital of Pataliputra. He also talked of the lifestyle in the cities and villages and the prosperity of the Mauryan cities.


Square silver coins issued between 321 and 181 BC in ancient India by the Mauryan Empire, which was created after the death of Alexander the GreatAdministration:
Chandragupta had united the whole of northern India under one rule. Mauryan Empire was the first large, powerful, centralized state in India. The Arthashastra laid the foundation of the centralized administration of Mauryan governance. The empire was divided into administrative districts or zones, each of which had a hierarchy of officials. The top most officers from these districts or zones directly reported to the Mauryan ruler. These officials were responsible for collecting taxes, maintaining the army, completing irrigational projects, and maintaining law and order.

During Chandragupta reign, the state regulated trade, levied taxes, and standardized weights and measures. Trade and commerce also flourished during this time. The state was responsible for providing irrigational facilities, succor, sanitation, and famine relief to its masses. Megasthenes, in his writings, has praised the efficient Mauryan administration.

Before the Kalinga war, the Mauryan administration under Ashoka was not different from that of his predecessors. Ashoka, like previous Mauryan kings, was at the head of the centralized administrative system. He was helped by a council of ministers that was in charge of different ministries like taxation, army, agriculture, justice, etc. The empire was divided into administrative zones, each one having its hierarchy of officials. The top most officers at the zonal level had to keep in touch with the king. These officers took care of all aspects of administration (social welfare, economy, law and order, military) in the different zones. The official ladder went down to the village level.

Religion:
Emperor Chandragupta Maurya became the first major Indian monarch to initiate a religious transformation at the highest level when he embraced Jainism, a religious movement resented by orthodox Hin dupriests that usually attended the imperial court. At an older age, Chandragupta renounced his throne and material possessions to join a wandering group of Jain monks. However his successor, Emperor Bindusara preserved Hindu traditions and distanced himself from Jain and Buddhist movements.

But when Ashoka embraced Buddhism following the Kalinga War, he renounced expansionism and aggression, and the harsher injunctions of the Arthashastra on the employ of force, intensive policing and ruthless measures for tax collection and against rebels. Ashoka sent a mission led by his son and daughter to Sri Lanka, whose king Tissa was so charmed with Buddhist ideals that he adopted it himself and made it the state religion. Ashoka sent many Buddhist missions to West Asia, Greece and South East Asia, and commissioned the construction of monasteries, schools and publication of Buddhist literature across the empire. He is believed to have built as many as 84,000 stupas across India, and increased the popularity of Buddhism in Afghanistan. Ashoka helped convene the Third Buddhist Council near his capital, that undertook much work of reform and expansion of the Buddhist religion.

While himself a Buddhist, Ashoka retained the membership of Hindu priests and ministers in his court, and maintained religious freedom and tolerance, although the Buddhist faith grew in popularity with his patronage. Indian society began embracing the philosophy of ahimsa, and given the prosperity and law enforcement, crime and internal conflicts reduced dramatically. Also greatly discouraged was the caste system and orthodox discrimination, as Hinduism began inculcating the ideals and values of Jain and Buddhist teachings. Social freedom began expanding in an age of peace and prosperity.

Economy:
Mauryans implemented a common economic system and enhanced trade and commerce, with increased agricultural productivity under the able guidance of Chanakya. Hundreds of earlier kingdoms, many small armies, powerful regional chieftains, and internecine warfare, gave way to this disciplined central authority
. Like in Arthashastra (by Kautilya)said, the king was the supreme head of the state. His duty was mainly ensuring the welfare and happiness of his subjects. He was to work almost 18-19 hours a day and was to be at the service of his people, courtiers, and officers any time of the hour. The country prospered during Mauryan rule.

The Council of ministers consisted of 3-12 members, each being the head of a department. Then there was the State council which could have 12,16 or 20 members. Besides, there was the bureaucracy consisting of the ‘Sannidhata’ (treasury head), ‘Samaharta’ (chief revenue collector), ‘Purohita’ (head priest),’Senapati’(commander of the army),’ Pratihara’ (chief of the palace guards),’Antarvamisika’ (head of the harem guards),’Durgapala’(governor of the fort), ‘Antahala’ (governor of the frontier),’Paur’(governor of the capital),’Nyayadhisha’ (chief justice),’Prasasta’ (police chief). Then there were the ‘Tirthas’, ‘Amatyas’ i.e officers in charge of accounts (controlled by the chief minister‘Mahaamatya’) of the: treasury, records, mines, mints, commerce, excise agriculture, toll, public utility, armory etc.

The governors or viceroys of provinces were called ‘Mahamatras’ and if the designation was held by a prince then he was called ‘Kumara mahamatra’. Assisting them were the ‘Yutas’ (tax collectors), ‘Rajukas’(revenue collectors),’Sthanikas’ and’Gopas’(district officers). Then there was the local village head called’ Gramika’ under whom the village assembly operated.
The civil courts were called ‘Dharmasthiya’ and criminal courts were called ‘Kantakshodhana’.
An international network of trade expanded during Ashoka's reign under the Indo-Greek friendship treaty. Like the Khyber pass, on the boundary of Pakistan and Afghanistan became important port of trade and intercourse with the outside world. Greek states and Hellenic kingdoms in West Asia became important trade partners of India. Trade also extended through the Malay peninsula into Southeast Asia. India's exports included silk goods and textiles, spices and exotic foods. The Empire was enriched further with an exchange of scientific knowledge and technology with Europe and West Asia. Ashoka also sponsored the construction of thousands of roads, waterways, canals, hospitals, rest-houses and other public works. The easing of many overly-rigorous administrative practices, including those regarding taxation and crop collection, helped increase productivity and economic activity across the Empire. In many ways, the economic situation in the Maurya Empire is comparable to the Roman Empire several centuries later, which both had extensive trade connections and both had organizations similar to corporations.

Architectures:
Fourteen Rock Edicts found at eight different places which are. Shahbazgarhi (seventh edict engraved on a bowl ,Peshawar, Pakistan presently displayed in the Prince of Wales museum, Mumbai),Manshera (Hazara),Kalsi (Dehradun, Uttarakhand),Girnar (Junagadh, Gujrat),Sopara(Thana, Maharashtra), Dhauli and Jaugada(Orissa) and erragudi(Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh)
. Minor Rock Edicts found at thirteen different places which are. Roopnath(Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh), Bairat(Jaipur, Rajasthan), Sasaram(Shahbad district, Bihar), Maski (Raichur, Karnataka), Gavimath and Palkigundu(Mysore, Karnataka), Gujarra(Datia district , Madhya Pradesh), Ahraura (Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh), Rajulamandagiri (Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh), Yerragudi and three neighbouring places in Chitaldurga district, Mysore. Seven Pillar Edicts found on a single pillar (Topra, presently displayed in Delhi).Rest were found in northern Bihar. The remaining inscriptions were engraved on rocks, pillars and cave walls.

The most important of these being the engravings on a pillar found at Rumindei (Nepal) which mentions Ashoka’s visit to the birthplace of Gautam Buddha at Lumbini. Two short inscriptions written in Aramaic have also been found at Taxilla and Jalalabad(Afghanistan). A bilingual inscription written in Greek and Aramaic has been found on a rock at Shar-i-Kuna(Kandahar, Afghanistan). Four edicts (one in Kharoshti script derived from Aramaic, used in Iran and others in perhaps, Prakrit, rest found in the country being in Brahmi) have been found in Shalatak and Qargha (Afghanistan).

The thirteenth rock edict gives a vivid account of Ashokas conquest of Kalinga (260 BC), after a prolonged war, in which 1,50,000 persons were captured, 1,00,000 killed and many times that number perished. Ashoka was said to have been filled with great remorse and guilt after witnessing the misery and bloodshed his war cost.


https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=10&cad=rja&ved=0CFEQFjAJ&url=http://historyofindia-madhunimkar.blogspot.com/2009/09/kingdom-of-maurya.html&ei=QPoWU4PbB4PArAf4zYCgBw&usg=AFQjCNHrVsmZw_o6bg-m_wqGK1I1uWQl1A&bvm=bv.62286460,d.bmk
--
even before maurya..
harapan civilisation..
was huge...
their construction was huge ....at mohendaro
in lothal they had port too.
they trade with iraq , arabs , china
so indian subcontinent was gold mine anytime...(including india , pak, afg,nepal,bhutan , mynamar )
 
.
Amongst the native civilizations,the only surviving ones living with pride are Hindus & Jews.
 
.
india only thrived under the Islamic rule. For about 1000+ year, Islamosphere remained the most dominant superpower of the globe..like U.S was in 1990's or British in 19th century etc. It was only after Islamic take-over that india found stability, organization, effective tax-collection system crafted by Akbar and so on.

Before that, india was usually bunch of hindu kindgoms invading and killing each other.

Even today, Islamic World vastly outperforms india in almost every aspect...
--
any link to prove your point
1. for your education
2.Islamosphere remained the most dominant superpower of the globe fo 1k yr
accepted.
3. It was only after Islamic take-over that india found stability, organization, effective tax-collection system crafted by Akbar and so on.
you heard chanykya ...
Chanakya is traditionally identified as Kautilya or Vishnu Gupta, who authored the ancient Indian political treatise called Arthasastra (Economics) in 200 BC.
The Arthashastra (IAST: Arthaśāstra) is an ancient Indian treatise on statecraft, economic policy and military strategy, written in Sanskrit

4.Before that, india was usually bunch of hindu kindgoms invading and killing each other.
first link please to prove your point
here is mine.

5. Even today, Islamic World vastly outperforms india in almost every aspec
cool.. are you from mars or saturn.
yes .. india cant compete with pak in terror export.. we only export IT, manfaturing goods.
i know your market is huge but we accept our defeat.
how many nobel pak got one that also you dont accept that guy..
here is link again what your own people think about poor silly chap called india ...
Pakistan is Scared of India's Stature in the World... - YouTube (repost)
pakistani education vs indian education system analysis - YouTube
R Anwar: IT Skills - Pakistan vs India - YouTube

Except Turkey not much g8 power islamic country can show in science and tech. ( again its secular country not islamic so cant term as islamic)
few islamic countries have petro dollar but that is in danger as
USA is looking to shift to shale reserve base economy which is economical and less polluting and ecology friedly (debatable)
once they get that .. see world will change in 360 degree....
BBC News - US shale oil supply shock shifts global power balance

waiting for your thoughtful reply

If there was no India before 1947, then the "East India Company" which was formed in 16th century was named after which country? called India??? :woot::woot::woot:

"East India Company" was formed 350 years ago from the 1947 so there must be a country called India. :wave:
---
good observation

It was named after sub-continent called "India" not a country "India"
---
it was never subcontinet called india....
india came after name of river sindhu.. indus .. so india......
 
.
--
any link to prove your point
1. for your education
2.Islamosphere remained the most dominant superpower of the globe fo 1k yr
accepted.
3. It was only after Islamic take-over that india found stability, organization, effective tax-collection system crafted by Akbar and so on.
you heard chanykya ...
Chanakya is traditionally identified as Kautilya or Vishnu Gupta, who authored the ancient Indian political treatise called Arthasastra (Economics) in 200 BC.
The Arthashastra (IAST: Arthaśāstra) is an ancient Indian treatise on statecraft, economic policy and military strategy, written in Sanskrit

4.Before that, india was usually bunch of hindu kindgoms invading and killing each other.
first link please to prove your point
here is mine.

5. Even today, Islamic World vastly outperforms india in almost every aspec
cool.. are you from mars or saturn.
yes .. india cant compete with pak in terror export.. we only export IT, manfaturing goods.
i know your market is huge but we accept our defeat.
how many nobel pak got one that also you dont accept that guy..
here is link again what your own people think about poor silly chap called india ...
Pakistan is Scared of India's Stature in the World... - YouTube (repost)
pakistani education vs indian education system analysis - YouTube
R Anwar: IT Skills - Pakistan vs India - YouTube

Except Turkey not much g8 power islamic country can show in science and tech. ( again its secular country not islamic so cant term as islamic)
few islamic countries have petro dollar but that is in danger as
USA is looking to shift to shale reserve base economy which is economical and less polluting and ecology friedly (debatable)
once they get that .. see world will change in 360 degree....
BBC News - US shale oil supply shock shifts global power balance

waiting for your thoughtful reply


---
good observation
who are you explaining to bro now they will say youtube is banned in pakistan & as ususal "mai nahi manta":coffee:
 
.
@RiazHaq What do you mean by "India" here? Indian sub-continent? because country "India" was born on 1947

In his vocab, anything that was bad is current India....anything that was good was in Pakistan. I am yet to see one post from him where he actually suggests something for Pakistan, without talking about India and how poor India is. Anyways, good for us (bad bad India), 'economists' like him exist in good Pakistan.
 
.
LMAO!

yeah..indians run NASA, GCC, EU, China, and Aramco etc.

What losers.

The very fact that your people need to go to Arab World to find a 'good life' shows where you stand.

Biggest company of GCC (and of the world, too) is Saudi Aramco...with estimated market capitalization of.....are you ready?.....$4-7 trillion!!!!

Go and look up the administration, Chief, CEO etc. of Aramco. Almost all Arab chief executives graduated from Stanford and with decades of experience.
---
1. Aramco..
can you tell me what is the full form of ARMCO..
arab company somthing ..
search who discoved oil in arab peninsula ?
you know who runs armco ? and why ?
learn history..it seems your history book are full of jugad....

2.can you elaborate
The very fact that your people need to go to Arab World to find a 'good life' shows where you stand.
NASA, GCC, china in arab land?
geography books too jugad

Ye kis ko fikr hai ke Qabeelay ka kyaa huwa?

Sab iss pe lad rahe hain ke Sardaar kaun hai.


who are you explaining to bro now they will say youtube is banned in pakistan & as ususal "mai nahi manta":coffee:


---
heeee true...
Duniya me aur bhi wajah hoti hai dil ke toot jane ki

log yuhi YOUTUBE ko badnam kiya karte hai !!


In his vocab, anything that was bad is current India....anything that was good was in Pakistan. I am yet to see one post from him where he actually suggests something for Pakistan, without talking about India and how poor India is. Anyways, good for us (bad bad India), 'economists' like him exist in good Pakistan.
--
actulay its a HAQ to riaz economics to make it perfect by him..
still learning
 
.
--
any link to prove your point


Ye kis ko fikr hai ke Qabeelay ka kyaa huwa?

Sab iss pe lad rahe hain ke Sardaar kaun hai.





---
heeee true...
Duniya me aur bhi wajah hoti hai dil ke toot jane ki

log yuhi YOUTUBE ko badnam kiya karte hai !!



--
actulay its a HAQ to riaz economics to make it perfect by him..
still learning


bhai tum utne naye nahi ho jitna tumhari posts bata rahi hai ...

lagta hai tera PDF se pehle ka hai nata koi

yoon hi nahi sabki baand PDF pe bajata koi
 
.
I don't know what kind of geography you have read but yes today's countries Pakistan, India, Bangladesh were part of geographical location named Indian sub-continent. It was called subcontinent because this region was/is home of dozens of different nations. Pakistani, Indian, Bangladeshi nations are post 47 concept. Even today as per Indian constitution India is Union of States
----
in indian context .. Union of state is ...
state cant leave to parent ... exa. MP/ UP cant leave india
it indestructible union with destructible state 9new state telangana )
in usa
state can leave USA
destructible union with destructible state

bhai tum utne naye nahi ho jitna tumhari posts bata rahi hai ...

lagta hai tera PDF se pehle ka hai nata koi

yoon hi nahi sabki baand PDF pe bajata koi
----
Hum Ne Mohbaton Ky Nashe Me Aa Kr Use Khuda Bana Dala,

Hosh Tab Aaya Jab Us Ne Kaha Ky Khuda Kisi ek Ka Nahi Hota…


--
that what we are saying
you not getting it...
Why is History taught in Pakistan so distorted??
we in india also have some issue of this kind
but we can max say Mosambi looks like orange
you guy called apple a pineapple with ruhani juice inside and outside thone is due to india , jews and kafirs
 
Last edited:
.
Unfortunately in Pakistan people think Arabs, Turkic and Afghan warlords brought light and noor to the world. What they don't understand is these people were less concerned about spreading Islam but general looting and massacres. Many times they allowed Non Muslims to live so they could extract large amount of Jiziya from them. :lol:



It was free for all i guess.

True. I have seen many people claiming the invaders brought light and civilisation for Native people, and before that we are poor, not advanced in anything, cave people. :lol: Doctors of Sub-continent have even performed a brain surgery in BC periods.
Islamic civilisations like Mughals were rich, enriching as well, it led to fuse of cultures. However the claims of some people are really funny.
 
.
it was never subcontinet called india....
india came after name of river sindhu.. indus .. so india......

All geographic area east of Indus was named as India/Hind. If you look for definition of subcontinent than only example you will find is Indian subcontinent.
 
.
Lets not twist the facts now, there were many great ancient civilizations in India. The Indian subcontinent was very rich in ancient times. I am pretty sure Arabs didn't come to India to convert people to Islam but mainly for looting. Was India always a united country or not? I don't know. The subcontinent is home to so many different nations and that's why we call it the Indian Subcontinent. Probably due to Vedic religions the different Indian peoples must have seen each other as a nation.
---
arab never came to india to invade
arab traded horse to kerala cost since mauryan times
arab more intrested in trade than land
it was iranians / mongal decentedent mughals...

indian subcontinet (afg/pak/india/nepal/bhutan/bangdesh) share indus civilisation...
which remains one of g8 in world.

in south india sangam period / vijayanagara was force to recon with and reach up to south east asia ...
---
it just few forcing their view point.
indian subcontinet know for absorbing cultures both for good and bad...which we forgot in last 300- 400 yrs
that why islam which was know for sufiism and peace now have negative perspective
and vedic puran which was scientific and egalitarian now have trace of strong hindu bias...

----------------
Religion is perfect but follower ?

All geographic area east of Indus was named as India/Hind. If you look for definition of subcontinent than only example you will find is Indian subcontinent.
-- yes true....
 
. .
---
arab never came to india..
it was iranians / mongal decentedent mughals...

indian subcontinet (afg/pak/india/nepal/bhutan/bangdesh) share indus civilisation...
which remains one of g8 in world.

in south india sangam period / vijayanagara was force to recon with and reach up to south east asia ...
---
it just few forcing their view point.
indian subcontinet know for absorbing cultures both for good and bad...which we forgot in last 300- 400 yrs
that why islam which was know for sufiism and peace now have negative perspective
and vedic puran which was scientific and egalitarian now have trace of strong hindu bias...

----------------
Religion is perfect but follower ?


-- yes true....

Oh bhai Arabs did invade through Sindh and reached up Multan. But later invasions wee mostly from Afghan, Turkic and Iranian warlords.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom