Han Patriot
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2011
- Messages
- 13,535
- Reaction score
- -36
- Country
- Location
So it's acceptable for you to quote wiki and not me? Haha. It's a proprierty ISA as per report from Jack Dongorra and not a commercial chip. It's used in Chinese HPC ecosystem. And again I reiterate, how does using open source ISA make a chip less indigenous? It's like saying you cannot program something because C+ is from US. The point here is India cannot fabricate nor design a processor up to curent standards. At most late 80s chip and even then you gave a lab instead of a real fab to make them. Try using shakti or ajit fir HPCs. Lol1. I have asked you to provide a document which proves that China has locally designed processors.
2. I have also said that I accept that AJIT is SPARC and Shakti is RISC-V, i.e. both are not local to India.
Since when did I say our cellphones are using local cores? I guess you cannot differentiate cores to processors righf? Today's processors are much mors complex from 80s chips, its more competitive to use arm core as do 90% of all cellphone manufacturers. But this is about to change after Huawei case. Your argument was that since China dont use our own cores in cellphone, thus our local chips don't exist. We weren't arguing about whether China phones use local cores btw. Consumers have nothing to do with arm cores? Gr8 trying putting ASHIT chips and see if ppl buy it. LolololYour point doesn't remove the fact that Chinese cell phones use ARM and not "indigenous Chinese processors" if they exist.
And what do consumers have to do with Chinese companies using ARM processors ??
Since when am I communist? Explain to me how is China communist when it is clearly a state capitalistic authoritarian government? Yoh need to get some basics on comumism boy.
Last edited: