kaykay
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 8,933
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
You may be right.I remember seeing CGI of two of those placed there. As far as I can remember.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You may be right.I remember seeing CGI of two of those placed there. As far as I can remember.
but sir where will you get money for themPakistan needs to work on Frigates, Corvettes and FAC with Auxiliary equipment with China and on Submarines with Germany or France...
well buddy look at it this way to launch your ASMs you need to be at least in 200 Kms near a CBG first question is how will you manage that cause an indian CBG will have have a 500 Km+ multi layered Radar shield around it while owr ground based assets(Radars+Fighters) scan/track & will take them owt before they even could reach near the CBGs + CBGs are not for paistan MKIs & Mig29 squads based in jamnagar alone can take care of all your assets in southern part of pakistan all the way uptill Balochistan + there are no shortage of fighters in jodhpur for central and ambala for north among others there is no way if a PAF planes takes off & survive to reach in firing zone anywhere say 200 Km+ from owr CBGs with so called "carrier killers"Yes they are threat to Pakistan but Pakistan has invested in Carrier Killers as above member too has mentioned. For now these should be a threat to india's billion$ ACC's.
But I think in future Pakistan should try getting one.
Pakistan needs to work on Frigates, Corvettes and FAC with Auxiliary equipment with China and on Submarines with Germany or France...
A SSN is not not important.. A quiet Diesel will also do. What is required is numbers. These subs have to be able to successfully get close into the ASW net to create issues. However, I would not count out the value of systems such as the Cm-400 or AGM-84. If nothing else, they serve as a source of consternation and have the fleet commander fretting at every flying object coming within 200km of the carrier. It also will force constant BARCAP which in itself is a drain on resources.
Moreover, BARCAPs are not a 100% guarantee that something will not get through or be launched. After all.. PAF mirages managed to break through BARCAPs by F-14s during exercises.. so its better never to underestimate the low level launch platform skimming some 30 feet above the sea.
It is true that ACs posses Threats in its own ways but Pakistan has heavily invested in Carrier Killers as Weapons of choice, the motives and objectives should be well know to INavy, decommission ACs temporary out of War is in itself a major success but remains to be seen how effectively Pakistan Navy/Air plans would be. It would be understatement and underestimation by INavy and they should be concerned as with little investment Pakistan can potentially achieve the objectives to taking out ACs out of War..
New Recruit
It is apparent that you do not read, analyse and comprehend the information that is available in "open source" before you toss up a piece of journalistic hype: i.e. "Carrier Killers".
I need to again point you at what @Oscar painstakingly pointed out on numerous occassions on some other threads about the fallacy of attempting to "kill" Carriers with a few missiles. I will just laugh at such Farmer John's simple-minded notions; so do take the trouble to read what Oscar has explained.
It is very important to understand first of all; how a Carrier is constructed. It is not constructed like a Canoe or even the Titanic. And a Carrier is constructed even more substantially than even todays RMS Queen Mary 2! There is something known as Damage Control which is an area of study that governs design and construction of Warships (actually all ships) and it stands to reason that those measures will reach their acme in the context of Carriers.
Then do try to imagine how those alleged "Carrier Killers" can even get delivered to a Carrier (which will be part of a CBG) manuevering on the high seas. Even more so; factor in the relative strengths of the Naval Assets (in three spheres of activity) at the command of the two adversaries in the scenario that you are attempting to conjure up.
All said and done those devices that you so lovingly and hopefully look upon as "Carrier Killers" can be considered to nice phallic symbols; little else.