What's new

Vietnam launches its first domestically made warship equipped with missiles

Status
Not open for further replies.
YEs.. I was avoiding the idea of specifically bringing X is to Y up but since you could not resist.. that is how it is.


If you were avoiding it, you would not have brought it up in the first place. Have some common sense, as a moderator you should know better. If you took the time to think about it, you would clearly see how it is applicable to Pakistan also. By the way, I notice how your post had nothing to do with this thread yet you are not punished with an infraction. Yet you issued an infraction to me for an incident that I did not start in another thread. I replied via msg defending myself but have not heard back. Gee I wonder why?


Anyhow, let's stick to the post because I don;t want to get another infraction for rules that are applied unfairly. Vietnam's attempt is pretty damn good. The boat is very slick and looks like it will be able to pierce the waves at high speeds and allow thier navy to penetrate their inland rivers, giving them a tactical advantage
 
. . .
Good useless ship like that is good for catching pirates and illegal trafickers only

Right, It is use for against pirates and illegal access

---------- Post added at 11:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:30 AM ----------

People's Liberation Army Navy


SEUY0YLZNHXRBK7J.jpg

It seems powerful navies of China use to against the United States, not us.
 
. . . .
If you were avoiding it, you would not have brought it up in the first place. Have some common sense, as a moderator you should know better. If you took the time to think about it, you would clearly see how it is applicable to Pakistan also. By the way, I notice how your post had nothing to do with this thread yet you are not punished with an infraction. Yet you issued an infraction to me for an incident that I did not start in another thread. I replied via msg defending myself but have not heard back. Gee I wonder why?


Anyhow, let's stick to the post because I don;t want to get another infraction for rules that are applied unfairly. Vietnam's attempt is pretty damn good. The boat is very slick and looks like it will be able to pierce the waves at high speeds and allow thier navy to penetrate their inland rivers, giving them a tactical advantage

Why even bother writing an essay to a chump. A chump is someone who has no balls but act tough over the internet. In this case, a moderator would be a good example. Not only they give bad reputation to this forum but its community. That ain't my problem, that's their problem when they don't know how to act right.
 
.
you were surprised when the Vietnamese defeat B52 with Sam2. in the future, please do not be surprised when you receive notification that an aircraft carrier was sunk by weapons from small boats of Vietnam

Dont threaten them friend..They haven't even started using their Carrier...
 
.
you were surprised when the Vietnamese defeat B52 with Sam2. in the future, please do not be surprised when you receive notification that an aircraft carrier was sunk by weapons from small boats of Vietnam

If you know how aircraft carriers are made these days, and the capabilities of anti-ship missiles, you won't make such foolish statement. Missiles from a small boat like this can at most damage the deck surface of a carrier, that is if it can ever get in range of firing. Carriers have AWACs that can spot your boat hundreds of miles away, and air crafts can sink the small boats within minutes.

This Vietnam ship is probably going to be used to scare fisherman that's it. I see little combat value.
 
.
If you know how aircraft carriers are made these days, and the capabilities of anti-ship missiles, you won't make such foolish statement. Missiles from a small boat like this can at most damage the deck surface of a carrier, that is if it can ever get in range of firing. Carriers have AWACs that can spot your boat hundreds of miles away, and air crafts can sink the small boats within minutes.

This Vietnam ship is probably going to be used to scare fisherman that's it. I see little combat value.

You have no idea what you're even talking about.
 
.
If you know how aircraft carriers are made these days, and the capabilities of anti-ship missiles, you won't make such foolish statement. Missiles from a small boat like this can at most damage the deck surface of a carrier, that is if it can ever get in range of firing. Carriers have AWACs that can spot your boat hundreds of miles away, and air crafts can sink the small boats within minutes.

This Vietnam ship is probably going to be used to scare fisherman that's it. I see little combat value.
If your carrier have 100 anti-ship missiles, then we will shoot 150 missiles to sink your carrier :cool:

btw: you just like Martian2 only show to people that Chinese trully have poor knowledge about combat experience , that why China lost in 1979 war and VN still control the largest part of SCS(east sea) untill now even our Naval forces is quite small.
 
.
China has 13 054A and 5 052C. Let's just count the mid-range SAM (>40km).

The total number is 13*32+5*48=656.

When any missile luck enough to penetrate the outer shield it will face FL3000,
images


There are at least 4 sets of FL3000 on board and that means another 80 to 100 SAM missiles.
 
. .
But before the VN navy had chance to your enemy and to launch your missiles, It will be already a history after PLAN's attack.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom