What's new

Vietnam Defence Forum

A recent "Joint Anti Terrorist Exercise" Between Vietnam and its northern neighbor

Look like the Border Guard will start re - equipping with IWI Gali soon. The rest of the Army will probably have to wait for a bit.

21765829_1782936125339157_7462960402862377663_o.jpg


21762880_1782936175339152_3201769032942619306_o.jpg


21950858_1782936132005823_5392879222415327348_o.jpg

PSGAT style helmets, new assault Rifle, new carrier vest for plate armor, new webbing and chest rig (compared to old commies style), a good progress indeed for the land forces. If Vietnam ever need it, I am sure, Indonesia can supply quality made infantry gears and tools in large number
 
.
PSGAT style helmets, new assault Rifle, new carrier vest for plate armor, new webbing and chest rig (compared to old commies style), a good progress indeed for the land forces. If Vietnam ever need it, I am sure, Indonesia can supply quality made infantry gears and tools in large number
In Vietnam, people are not fancy with army's costume, hope leader will change their though and indo maybe is a good choice for the changing
 
.
Ha ha you are a difficult person. ok one last try. China thinks having a chance against legendary Vietnamese navy if they one day have more air craft carriers than the US that once deployed in the war against Vietnam in the South China sea: 27. posting just three, 27 would be too much here.

USS Yorktown
IMG_3725.JPG


USS Kitty Hawk
IMG_3726.JPG


USS Forrestal
IMG_3727.PNG
 
.
IMG_3731.JPG

POLICIES & POLITICS
China pulls Vietnam border war movie from cinema holiday line-up at last minute
Director Feng Xiaogang’s tribute to veterans withdrawn in lead-up to key Communist Party gathering, industry source says

Choi Chi-yuk
UPDATED : Sunday, 24 Sep 2017, 8:26PM


A movie tribute by one of China’s leading directors to Chinese veterans of the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese war has been pulled from cinemas after a last-minute “discussion”.

Director Feng Xiaogang’s movie Youth, or Fanghua, was scheduled to be released across China on September 29 in time for the weeklong National Day holiday.

But in a brief online statement on Sunday, Feng’s production house said the release date would be postponed as a result of “discussions with the film administration bureau and other relevant parties”.

“The new release date [of Youth] will be made public later on. We apologise to cinemas and viewers for any inconvenience caused,” the statement said.

The movie tells the story of a military dance troupe during the Cultural Revolution and China’s brief border war with Vietnam.

Ticket sales and promotion for the movie were already under way.

A movie industry source said the film touched on many sensitive topics and the authorities did not want it aired right before the Communist Party gathered for its five-yearly national congress next month.

The congress is scheduled to start on October 18 and usher in a change of leadership at the top.

To ensure a smooth transition, the authorities will bar sensitive issues from the media, prevent protesters from entering Beijing, and shut down dozens of factories near the capital to minimise pollution.

China’s big and small screens have been flooded over the years with productions about the country’s wars with Japan in the 1930s and 1940s, but there are few about the Sino-Vietnamese conflict.

Veterans have also repeatedly staged protests in Beijing over the past couple of years, demanding compensation from the government and better social welfare.

Dubbed the Steven Spielberg of China, Feng, 60, reportedly told his production team that he wanted Youth to be a tribute to the soldiers who fought in the border conflict.

“What I am trying to tell the audience is absolutely not about the power of war. I will not praise war. I want the audience to see the cruelty of war,” Dazhong Daily quoted Feng as saying on Friday.


IMG_3728.JPG

IMG_3729.JPG
IMG_3730.JPG



Feng had reportedly given out 10,000 tickets to the movie, urging young people to see Youth with their parents. He hoped young people would not forget the lessons of history, learning to treasure peace and to understand their parents, Feng said on his microblog on Wednesday.

The movie’s withdrawal makes it two years in a row that one of Feng’s films has been pulled from screens for the National Day holidays. I Am Not Madame Bovary, a movie about petitioning in China, was withdrawn at the same time last year before being released in November.
 
.
View attachment 427933
POLICIES & POLITICS
China pulls Vietnam border war movie from cinema holiday line-up at last minute
Director Feng Xiaogang’s tribute to veterans withdrawn in lead-up to key Communist Party gathering, industry source says

Choi Chi-yuk
UPDATED : Sunday, 24 Sep 2017, 8:26PM


A movie tribute by one of China’s leading directors to Chinese veterans of the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese war has been pulled from cinemas after a last-minute “discussion”.

Director Feng Xiaogang’s movie Youth, or Fanghua, was scheduled to be released across China on September 29 in time for the weeklong National Day holiday.

But in a brief online statement on Sunday, Feng’s production house said the release date would be postponed as a result of “discussions with the film administration bureau and other relevant parties”.

“The new release date [of Youth] will be made public later on. We apologise to cinemas and viewers for any inconvenience caused,” the statement said.

The movie tells the story of a military dance troupe during the Cultural Revolution and China’s brief border war with Vietnam.

Ticket sales and promotion for the movie were already under way.

A movie industry source said the film touched on many sensitive topics and the authorities did not want it aired right before the Communist Party gathered for its five-yearly national congress next month.

The congress is scheduled to start on October 18 and usher in a change of leadership at the top.

To ensure a smooth transition, the authorities will bar sensitive issues from the media, prevent protesters from entering Beijing, and shut down dozens of factories near the capital to minimise pollution.

China’s big and small screens have been flooded over the years with productions about the country’s wars with Japan in the 1930s and 1940s, but there are few about the Sino-Vietnamese conflict.

Veterans have also repeatedly staged protests in Beijing over the past couple of years, demanding compensation from the government and better social welfare.

Dubbed the Steven Spielberg of China, Feng, 60, reportedly told his production team that he wanted Youth to be a tribute to the soldiers who fought in the border conflict.

“What I am trying to tell the audience is absolutely not about the power of war. I will not praise war. I want the audience to see the cruelty of war,” Dazhong Daily quoted Feng as saying on Friday.


View attachment 427929
View attachment 427930 View attachment 427931


Feng had reportedly given out 10,000 tickets to the movie, urging young people to see Youth with their parents. He hoped young people would not forget the lessons of history, learning to treasure peace and to understand their parents, Feng said on his microblog on Wednesday.

The movie’s withdrawal makes it two years in a row that one of Feng’s films has been pulled from screens for the National Day holidays. I Am Not Madame Bovary, a movie about petitioning in China, was withdrawn at the same time last year before being released in November.
trailer of the film
and interview the director Fang Xiao Gang

through trailer, this film likely is more real than the American film, especially the film " we are soldiers" describes the American soldier like a Rambo, and our soldiers are stupid by suicidal human-wave attacks when Nguyen Huu An is one of the most experienced generals.
 
Last edited:
.
Retropolis
‘The Dragon Lady’: How Madame Nhu helped escalate the Vietnam War

By Colby Itkowitz September 26 at 7:00 AM

IMG_3736.JPG
Madame Nhu, left, the de facto first lady of South Vietnam, and her daughter Le Thuy leave the Elizabeth Arden beauty salon on Connecticut Avenue in Washington on Oct. 16, 1963. (William Smith/AP)


During a public relations tour of the United States, Vietnam’s de facto first lady, Madame Nhu, spoke at the National Press Club in Washington. Inside, she taunted and belittled the Kennedy administration, accusing the White House of treason for economic sanctions against South Vietnam. Protesters gathered outside met by a smaller faction of her fans from the American Nazi Party holding signs that read, “Madame Nhu, we like you.” And “JFK salutes red Tito, shuns Madame Nhu.”

It was the fall of 1963, and by then the North Vietnamese communists had been carrying out guerrilla attacks against the South for several years. The United States had already started spraying the chemical Agent Orange in rural areas where guerrillas were thought to be hiding out. The first U.S. soldiers had been killed by the Viet Cong.

Nhu, born Tran Le Xuan, was married to the brother of President Ngo Dinh Diem, a bachelor, and so he entrusted her with all the duties of a first lady. Though she makes only brief appearance in the 10-part documentary on the Vietnam War by Ken Burns and Lynn Novick, she played a significant role in the trajectory of the United States’ involvement in Vietnam.

Elegant and strong-willed, she was a figure of international intrigue in the early 1960s. Unlike America’s first lady, who was demure, classy and media shy, Nhu rarely shied from the spotlight. Both Time and Life magazines featured her on their covers. Jacqueline Kennedy once said Nhu was “everything Jack found unattractive” in a woman, according to the documentary.

By 1963, the Viet Cong was not only waging a war against the South, but the Buddhist majority in the South was also rebelling against the Diem regime. When a Buddhist monk lit himself on fire in protest in the middle of the city, Nhu flippantly said he had been “barbecued” with “imported gasoline,” and offered to supply more fuel for other Buddhists and would stand by “and clap.”

Later, she claimed her words were inspired by a conversation her children had overheard between two Americans in a Saigon snack bar. “I am only a victim of American advice,” she said.

Americans dubbed her “Dragon Lady,” and President John F. Kennedy was said to have called her a “goddamn bitch.” Because of the Buddhist uprising, and Diem’s poor handling of it, the Kennedy administration was losing trust in Diem’s ability to lead such a fractured nation. And Nhu only added to that anxiety.

Nhu irritated the U.S. government by questioning American motives. She referred in one speech to “false brothers” who didn’t understand Diem’s positions, a not-so-veiled reference to the Kennedy White House. She also alleged the U.S. Embassy in Saigon had “threatened and blackmailed” the Vietnamese government in an effort “to shut me up,” to which a State Department spokesman responded, “We don’t wish to comment on Madame Nhu’s utterances, especially in view of the fact that she does not have any official position in the Vietnamese administration.”

During her 1963 U.S. speaking tour, she accused the United States of being soft on communism and presented herself as the victim. She complained that the Kennedy White House, which did not acknowledge her visit, could have shown her “more courtesy.” She made several high-profile appearances, including an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” She said America wasn’t as anti-communist as Vietnam and had given in to liberalism, which in her view meant they were, “not red yet, but they are pink.”

The Washington Post described her during her visit as “petite, quick-witted” and remarked on her “long, sharpened red fingernails detracting somewhat from her posture of defenselessness.”

Meanwhile, while Nhu traveled the United States, the Kennedy administration urged the Diem government to make significant changes in how it was running South Vietnam. Eventually, a frustrated Kennedy heeded the advice of State Department officials and let it be known that he did not want to start a coup, but wouldn’t stop one either.

Nhu was in Los Angeles with her daughter when dissident generals launched an attack against the South Vietnamese government on Nov. 1, 1963. Nhu’s husband and President Diem were both killed.

Nhu blamed the United States. “The deaths were murders,” she said, “either with the official or unofficial blessings of the American Government.”

When she left her L.A. hotel, reporters asked her whether she felt defeated. She responded defiantly: “Never! Never! Never!” In a news conference on Nov. 2, 1963, she said those who carried out “such a cruel injustice,” should have to “pay for it.”

Less than three weeks later, Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas. Among the many conspiracy theories around his death is that Nhu had him killed in retaliation. She did send a condolence letter to Jacqueline Kennedy with this cutting line: “I sympathize the more for I understand that that ordeal might seem to you even more unbearable because of your habitually well-sheltered life.”
 
.
trailer of the film
and interview the director Fang Xiao Gang

through trailer, this film likely is more real than the American film, especially the film " we are soldiers" describes the American soldier like a Rambo, and our soldiers are stupid by suicidal human-wave attacks when Nguyen Huu An is one of the most experienced generals.


It never good for patriotism and glory of country when combat scenes are too realistic, everybody from both side die ugly and no one win. Remember the movie Saving private Ryan, it was a total shock to the viewers because it was the first time the combat scenes was graphic and realistic. During WW2, at one time the US Government shown dead American soldiers in the Pacific and public was sick and they were a dropped in the recruitment centers. Since that failure till today, they stopped showing dead US servicemen.

203b1333a4534b0fc8d2e710a3310268.jpg


A photo and a comment of Colonel John Moore who was portrayed in We were soldiers

An injured North Vietnamese soldier is led from his bunker by soldiers of the U.S. First Cavalry Division. This soldier held up the U.S. advance for one hour with machine-gun fire. He was wounded and captured. 'If he was in the American army', said U.S. Army Colonel John Moore at the time, 'I would recommend him for a medal.'"

Haha especially those scenes when NVA doing human waves during broad daylight and none of NVA soldiers can’t shot right…. Those combat scenes look so fake.

I never like Colonel John Moore he seem so arrogant and narcissist in interviews. Americans like to brag that they never lost a battle during the Viet Nam war. But how can you lost a battle when you have all the weaponry, a destructive fire power, rapid reinforcement available by choppers, plenty ammunition and supplies, superb medical evacuation & support and endless fire support (from ground, naval and air)? Now try to win a battle with infantry with light and medium weaponry, very little limited fire support (mostly mortars), limited ammunition & supplies, basic medical support and almost zero reinforcement.

PSGAT style helmets, new assault Rifle, new carrier vest for plate armor, new webbing and chest rig (compared to old commies style), a good progress indeed for the land forces. If Vietnam ever need it, I am sure, Indonesia can supply quality made infantry gears and tools in large number

Why Vietnam will need Indonesia to produce those basic military gears? it not like you need high tech and advanced manufacturing industry to produce webbing, helmet, flak jackets… You suggesting VN manufacturing industry is like at the same level as East Timor or something… VN already producing all those military gears, they just need to speed up the production, remember we talking in hundred thousands pieces... No need to hurry, I guess the budget is going to the air force and navy in priority.
 
.
It never good for patriotism and glory of country when combat scenes are too realistic, everybody from both side die ugly and no one win. Remember the movie Saving private Ryan, it was a total shock to the viewers because it was the first time the combat scenes was graphic and realistic. During WW2, at one time the US Government shown dead American soldiers in the Pacific and public was sick and they were a dropped in the recruitment centers. Since that failure till today, they stopped showing dead US servicemen.

View attachment 428250

A photo and a comment of Colonel John Moore who was portrayed in We were soldiers

An injured North Vietnamese soldier is led from his bunker by soldiers of the U.S. First Cavalry Division. This soldier held up the U.S. advance for one hour with machine-gun fire. He was wounded and captured. 'If he was in the American army', said U.S. Army Colonel John Moore at the time, 'I would recommend him for a medal.'"

Haha especially those scenes when NVA doing human waves during broad daylight and none of NVA soldiers can’t shot right…. Those combat scenes look so fake.

I never like Colonel John Moore he seem so arrogant and narcissist in interviews. Americans like to brag that they never lost a battle during the Viet Nam war. But how can you lost a battle when you have all the weaponry, a destructive fire power, rapid reinforcement available by choppers, plenty ammunition and supplies, superb medical evacuation & support and endless fire support (from ground, naval and air)? Now try to win a battle with infantry with light and medium weaponry, very little limited fire support (mostly mortars), limited ammunition & supplies, basic medical support and almost zero reinforcement.



Why Vietnam will need Indonesia to produce those basic military gears? it not like you need high tech and advanced manufacturing industry to produce webbing, helmet, flak jackets… You suggesting VN manufacturing industry is like at the same level as East Timor or something… VN already producing all those military gears, they just need to speed up the production, remember we talking in hundred thousands pieces... No need to hurry, I guess the budget is going to the air force and navy in priority.

Yeah yeah, whatever
 
.
It never good for patriotism and glory of country when combat scenes are too realistic, everybody from both side die ugly and no one win. Remember the movie Saving private Ryan, it was a total shock to the viewers because it was the first time the combat scenes was graphic and realistic. During WW2, at one time the US Government shown dead American soldiers in the Pacific and public was sick and they were a dropped in the recruitment centers. Since that failure till today, they stopped showing dead US servicemen.

View attachment 428250

A photo and a comment of Colonel John Moore who was portrayed in We were soldiers

An injured North Vietnamese soldier is led from his bunker by soldiers of the U.S. First Cavalry Division. This soldier held up the U.S. advance for one hour with machine-gun fire. He was wounded and captured. 'If he was in the American army', said U.S. Army Colonel John Moore at the time, 'I would recommend him for a medal.'"

Haha especially those scenes when NVA doing human waves during broad daylight and none of NVA soldiers can’t shot right…. Those combat scenes look so fake.

I never like Colonel John Moore he seem so arrogant and narcissist in interviews. Americans like to brag that they never lost a battle during the Viet Nam war. But how can you lost a battle when you have all the weaponry, a destructive fire power, rapid reinforcement available by choppers, plenty ammunition and supplies, superb medical evacuation & support and endless fire support (from ground, naval and air)? Now try to win a battle with infantry with light and medium weaponry, very little limited fire support (mostly mortars), limited ammunition & supplies, basic medical support and almost zero reinforcement.



Why Vietnam will need Indonesia to produce those basic military gears? it not like you need high tech and advanced manufacturing industry to produce webbing, helmet, flak jackets… You suggesting VN manufacturing industry is like at the same level as East Timor or something… VN already producing all those military gears, they just need to speed up the production, remember we talking in hundred thousands pieces... No need to hurry, I guess the budget is going to the air force and navy in priority.
Saving private Ryan is a good made film because it has a good story with realistic scenes. It is not as brutal as it may seem, least a propaganda film.

Vietnam surely can produce military clothing and make small stuffs such as rattling cannon AK-630M but we lack capacity of building sophisticated things as warships, planes and tanks. And many more others. Seeking partners, buying technology and building R&D at home is the way to go.

IMG_3737.JPG


Ah..Funny pictures for enemy spy satellites

IMG_3738.JPG
IMG_3739.JPG
 
.
It never good for patriotism and glory of country when combat scenes are too realistic, everybody from both side die ugly and no one win. Remember the movie Saving private Ryan, it was a total shock to the viewers because it was the first time the combat scenes was graphic and realistic. During WW2, at one time the US Government shown dead American soldiers in the Pacific and public was sick and they were a dropped in the recruitment centers. Since that failure till today, they stopped showing dead US servicemen.

View attachment 428250

A photo and a comment of Colonel John Moore who was portrayed in We were soldiers

An injured North Vietnamese soldier is led from his bunker by soldiers of the U.S. First Cavalry Division. This soldier held up the U.S. advance for one hour with machine-gun fire. He was wounded and captured. 'If he was in the American army', said U.S. Army Colonel John Moore at the time, 'I would recommend him for a medal.'"

Haha especially those scenes when NVA doing human waves during broad daylight and none of NVA soldiers can’t shot right…. Those combat scenes look so fake.

I never like Colonel John Moore he seem so arrogant and narcissist in interviews. Americans like to brag that they never lost a battle during the Viet Nam war. But how can you lost a battle when you have all the weaponry, a destructive fire power, rapid reinforcement available by choppers, plenty ammunition and supplies, superb medical evacuation & support and endless fire support (from ground, naval and air)? Now try to win a battle with infantry with light and medium weaponry, very little limited fire support (mostly mortars), limited ammunition & supplies, basic medical support and almost zero reinforcement.



Why Vietnam will need Indonesia to produce those basic military gears? it not like you need high tech and advanced manufacturing industry to produce webbing, helmet, flak jackets… You suggesting VN manufacturing industry is like at the same level as East Timor or something… VN already producing all those military gears, they just need to speed up the production, remember we talking in hundred thousands pieces... No need to hurry, I guess the budget is going to the air force and navy in priority.


In fact, in the battle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Ia_Drang where John Moore attended, I hear our veterans said from the situation of battle, Vietnamese soldier realized they could fight well against American and they are not formidable as people always think. My neighbor is a VC, he fought more than 10 years in jung, he said they(VC) didn't fear to confront American, from what he said, he supposed the new Zealand soldier is really good, maybe it is only his opinion.

One question on Quora :
Is it true that Vietnam learns about guerilla warfare tactics from Indonesia?
Dithia Sofyan
No, it isn’t. This is a very popular misunderstanding in Indonesia.

Vietnam have long history with guerilla style warfare, first happen in war against ancient Chinese dynasty of Han in 200s BC. They also fought the Mongols with similar strategy. Later in modern times, Vietnam independence group Viet Minh fight the Japanese and the French using guerilla warfare. So the Vietnamese already well versed in this kind of strategy.

What is true is Vietnam military leaders use a book wrote by a top Indonesian guerilla fighter (served in Indonesian Army’s Siliwangi Division on the War of Independence against the Dutch from 1945–1949) named General Abdul Haris Nasution. The book was written in 1953 after the General was “set aside” because his involvement in an attempted coup against President Soekarno in 1952.

main-qimg-c1f855277cb513389f53df4a69064ebf.webp

This book called “The Fundamentals of Guerilla Warfare” (Indonesian: Pokok-Pokok Gerilya).

main-qimg-77ed1cbe23369eb72f2d3bc88b90b4dc.webp

This book is a part of a set of literatures used for reference on the concept of guerilla warfare in modern times. Vietnamese General Vo Nguyen Giap said this book is one of the most important literature on this topic at the time, equal with Mao Ze Dong’s “On Guerilla Warfare”.

main-qimg-8da5a8b995adb70c1bbbb3d6b992f785.webp

Not just Vietnamese, this book also became a reference in West Point Academy.
 
.
Yeah yeah, whatever

When you have nothing to say, just don’t write anything. It’s just silly writing meaningless words as a respond

In fact, in the battle where John Moore attended, I hear our veterans said from the situation of battle, Vietnamese soldier realized they could fight well against American and they are not formidable as people always think. My neighbor is a VC, he fought more than 10 years in jung, he said they(VC) didn't fear to confront American, from what he said, he supposed the new Zealand soldier is really good, maybe it is only his opinion.


The small contingent of New Zealand troops were integrated into Australian battalions. Here one quote that resume why the Aussies troop were better than the American

One former Viet Cong leader is quoted as saying; "Worse than the Americans were the Australians. The Americans style was to hit us, then call for planes and artillery. Our response was to break contact and disappear if we could...The Australians were more patient than the Americans, better guerrilla fighters, better at ambushes. They liked to stay with us instead of calling in the planes. We were more afraid of their style."
 
.
ASIA
‘The Vietnam War’ Draws Muted Official Response in Hanoi

Last Updated: September 24, 2017 8:09 AM

50509608-36DC-4F8A-B9C0-59612554B397_cx0_cy3_cw0_w408_r1_s.jpg

Ken Burns participates in the "The Vietnam War" panel during the PBS portion of the 2017 Summer Television Critics Association meeting at the Beverly Hilton Hotel in Beverly Hills, Calif., July 30, 2017

WASHINGTON —
Until this week, the Vietnamese government has remained silent about the release of The Vietnam War, which premiered in the U.S. after a big buildup.

In Vietnam’s lively online sphere, many commentators speculated that authorities had remained silent about the series because it presented what the government considered sensitive material about towering Communist Party figures, such as Ho Chi Minh and General Vo Nguyen Giap.

The 10-part documentary film series by Ken Burns and Lynn Novick, which premiered September 17, covers the war’s main events and focuses on the experiences of Americans and Vietnamese during the war. American broadcaster PBS (Public Broadcasting Service) is streaming it online with Vietnamese subtitles.


08596FDD-3D24-4BC7-A6A5-2EB52C76FBCB_w408_r0_s.jpg

FILE - Vietnamese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Le Thi Thu Hang speaks to reporters during a regular press briefing in Hanoi, Vietnam, Aug. 3, 2017.


On Wednesday, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Le Thi Thu Hang issued a statement saying, “The Anti-America War of the Vietnamese people was a righteous revolution that mobilized the entire nation, and was supported wholeheartedly by friends and people worldwide.

“Positive developments in the comprehensive partnership between Vietnam and the United States are the results of great efforts by the two counties,” Hang continued. “The policy of Vietnam is to put the past behind us, overcome differences, promote our mutual interests and look forward to the future.”

She added, “I personally hope that American people and filmmakers understand the righteousness of the revolution as well as Vietnam’s goodwill.”

Like the government, the Vietnamese press has remained muted in its response to the well-reviewed documentary that has been a major event in the United States.

Only the Thanh Nien newspaper has covered the effort by Burns and Novick, reporting last month that the “U.S. consulate general in Ho Chi Minh City would hold a screening and discussion session” based on a 90-minute synopsis of the documentary. Vietnam’s top daily added that "film director and producer Lynn Novick is here in Vietnam to meet and discuss with the guests and the audience during the screening."

One of the people who attended the screening, a former journalist, wrote on Facebook that after the screening, another attendee, a young woman, asked Novick why in the excerpts “do I only see characters from North Vietnam being interviewed? Will people from the South be interviewed?”


15802479-659F-49DB-B1AD-DA9D53FA268C_w408_r0_s.jpg

FILE - Ken Burns, from left, Trent Reznor, Atticus Ross and Lynn Novick speak at PBS' "The Vietnam War" panel at the 2017 Television Critics Association press tour in Pasadena, Calif.

The journalist noted that Novick said people from the South had been interviewed and “that will be evident when you see the complete documentary being shown on the PBS website."

The former journalist, who once worked for the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), added on Facebook, “Lynn’s answer raised an uneasy suspicion about whether the shown clip was heavily censored before it was screened to young people, who really wanted to understand the Vietnam War beyond the simple division over red and yellow flags [of the current and former regime respectively].”

About 70 percent of Vietnam’s 96.1 million citizens were born after the April 1975 fall of Saigon.
 
.
Chinese top political advisor stresses exchanges with Vietnam Fatherland Front
Xinhua, September 26, 2017

Chinese top political advisor Yu Zhengsheng Tuesday met with Vice President of the Vietnam Fatherland Front (VFF) Central Committee Truong Thi Ngoc Anh.

"China always attaches importance to its ties with Vietnam," said Yu, chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC).

He said leaders of both countries have met several times this year and reached important consensus on comprehensive cooperation.

"China is willing to make joint efforts with Vietnam to strengthen strategic communication, deepen pragmatic cooperation, properly handle differences and promote bilateral ties to a healthy and steady development," Yu said.

Yu said the CPPCC is ready to enhance exchanges with the VFF, share experience in participating in and deliberating state affairs, and play a positive role in advancing friendly cooperation between the two countries and people-to-people exchanges.

Truong Thi Ngoc Anh said the VFF was ready to work with the CPPCC to boost the comprehensive strategic partnership of cooperation between the two countries.
 
.
I can tell you the vulnerabilities and weaknesses of PLA:
- slow progress of the J20 program; we need to wait till 2020 to have 100 J20s in service, only half of the size of the F22 fleet, needless to say the growing inventory of F35!
- slow progress of the carrier program; PLAN will have only two carriers by 2020 (Liaoning + Type 002 that still in building progress); 5~6 carriers by 2030. Even if the 2030 target achieved as plan, it is still only half of the size of US Navy. And the US carriers are all nuclear powered + catapult-assisted take off, which makes the China/US gap even larger;
- slow progress of the destroyers program. PLAN will have only 20~30 modern destroyers (052C, 052D, 055) by 2020; but US Navy has close to 100 units!! (AB class + Ticonderoga + Zumwalt)
- slow progress of the stealth bomber H20 program. I guess PLAAF will have the first operational H20 in between 2025 to 2030. But US had its very first B2 in 1990!! Sh!t, a 40year gap!!!
- slow progress of the fixed-wing plane program! Sh!t, this is the program that I hate most!! We've been waiting for it for toooo much time. Without the fixed wing plane platform, it is impossible for PLAN/AF to have suitable carrier-borne AEW, or anti-sub plane.
- slow progress of the nuclear subs. Compared to the US Virginia Class or Ohio Class, the PLAN nuclear sub fleet makes me unhappy again!!
- Insufficient investment on defense. China spends only 1.9% of the GDP on defense, the investment intensity is toooo small. To be honest I feel envy to Vietnam, because Vietnam spends 2.4% of the GDP on defense. This makes me envy!

I like your opinion about PLA weaknesses: slow progress in military technology and lack defense budget. But let me give you my honest opinion, weaponry is an important factor to win battle but the decisive one is the human factor. People (that fellow PLA modernization) should have a closer look on how the Saudi army are performing in Yemen, it will give you another opinion about money can’t buy competent, courage, operational readiness , combat experience, ect. During military training, soldiers look good and we can fix errors. But in a real battlefield with anarchy, destruction and blood it’s another world of pain and sadness.

The Saudis army are doing a horrible job in Yemen, despite having a huge military budget (3rd in the world just behind China), have all the modern weaponry from the West (better in quality and performance than what the PLA have), also trained by the Americans and they have U.S. and French military personnel providing coordination and support for currently Yemen operations… And still the Saudis army perform poorly against a ragtag undernourished lightly armed Houthis rebels (in the poorest middle east country) . Can you imagine if the Saudi army will have to fight a REAL capable army (like the Iranian army or Israeli)?

The dead toll and huge lost of equipments don’t lie about their mediocrity (just go look at videoclips in the internet), the fully equipped and modern Saudis are fighting like a bunch of amateurs and prone to mistakes (like amateurs). Money can’t buy a victory (but it may help tho) but history have shown that when you fight against a determined and resilient enemy it need a lot more than weaponry and money to defeat them.
Damaged_US_Army_AH-64_Apache_Iraq-620x350.jpg
View attachment 428776
CYKV2CBWMAANdBe.jpg
 

Attachments

  • CYKV2CBWMAANdBe.jpg
    CYKV2CBWMAANdBe.jpg
    53.5 KB · Views: 25
Last edited:
.
Albeit having the third largest defense budget, Saudi military spent much of their money on charity and influence on their neighbor. Egypt and Libanon is one of their largest recipients, not to mention Saudi and their gulf allies notoriously using mercenaries forces to do their frontline duty. What can you expect from merc whom loyalties lies on money?

The same cant be said against competent Armies from Asian and Far East region, their modernization drive is paralel with their ever increasingly progress in HDI and Nationalism sentiment
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom