gambit
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 28,569
- Reaction score
- 148
- Country
- Location
This is why you are a joke in this debate. In any business transaction, the parties may have a common goal but details may convince one side that agreeing to the contract may not be in its self interests. This happens every day. South Viet Nam did not signed the Accords for some reasons and am not going to tell you what they are. Not telling a fool like you does not constitute telling any lie. It was the Viet Minh who did not want partition. Does that mean South Viet Nam wanted partition?Read it for yourself, Gambit
Lập trường của Quốc gia Việt Nam
* the former South Vietnamese Minister of Foreign Affairs - Tran Van Do, whom refused to sign the 1954 Geneva Accords. Not the Viet Minh that did not want partition.
Let us take a look at your argument again...
If South Viet Nam did signed, does that mean South Viet Nam wanted and agreed to a partition? Heck...Am willing to bet you never read the entire document in the first place. So here is your homework, find the full text of the 1954 Geneva Accords conference and present it here. Then we will continue...South Vietnam did not sign because South Vietnam did not agree to have Vietnam divided into two zones...