USA ruler vs Russia ruler

[nahtanbob]

And how a wall street banker influentiate USA politics? There is no public official information available about that.

But it happens, is it?

How can that happens in the "biggest democracy"? Who has voted George Soros and all others Wall St bankers elite?

In fact, nobody says that Soros or another AmericanJewish bankers set the policy, they dont waste time, all the burocrat work can be done by Biden, and the important decisions like wars and economic, it's when they "influentiate" to the "biggest democracy" and their will is done.

People with money get to influence politics. There are limits to how much they can get.

If you look at the US federal budget how much of the spending can be really changed ? Ask yourself that question. I think 95% of the budget is more or less fixed.

 

[gambit]

When I was active duty, we used a mish-mash of imperial and metric rulers. Most of us on the radio would use metric, but we had no problems switching back and forth whenever we hear someone used 'yard' instead of 'meter'. So yes, we are comfortable with both rulers.

 

[BHAN85]

People with money get to influence politics. There are limits to how much they can get.

If you look at the US federal budget how much of the spending can be really changed ? Ask yourself that question. I think 95% of the budget is more or less fixed.

But there is not public official information about how that influence works.

Limits? That banker is talking about a partnership with China, what is the limit then? the moon?

If a private banker can decide about USA parnertship with a "enemy", then there are no limits.

 

[BHAN85]

There is nothing illogical about he says. A fight with China is fraught with potential risks

BTW, you think there is nothing illogical in a partnership with China to avoid world war.

But, it's logical provocating Russia in Ukraine.

It's a nonsense, when a Russia is a better nuclear armed power than China.

That only can have sense if Soros have access to better private source of information (e.g: some military technology superiority of China over Russia in a nuclear world war, that is not publicly known).

 

[nahtanbob]

BTW, you think there is nothing illogical in a partnership with China to avoid world war.

But, it's logical provocating Russia in Ukraine.

It's a nonsense, when a Russia is a better nuclear armed power than China.

That only can have sense if Soros have access to better private source of information (e.g: some military technology superiority of China over Russia in a nuclear world war, that is not publicly known).

We do massive business with China. There is some common ground on working together even with a decoupling. China is a little bit more pragmatic. Hopefully America is too.

Ukraine is a free country that has the right to determine its course. Russia does not have a veto on internal affairs of Ukraine. If the Russia is a nuclear power so are USA, France and UK.

 

[BHAN85]

We do massive business with China. There is some common ground on working together even with a decoupling. China is a little bit more pragmatic. Hopefully America is too.

Ukraine is a free country that has the right to determine its course. Russia does not have a veto on internal affairs of Ukraine. If the Russia is a nuclear power so are USA, France and UK.

But Soros doesnt talk about economic reasons, he talked about military reasons, about a world war, to do a partnership with China.

Public information says that Russia would be worst enemy in a world war against USA than China, a lot more ICBM/SLBM and nukes.