What's new

US 'would lose a war with China fought in the Pacific

The PLA is far more opaque about their funding. Most of their internal conversations are kept private.
Am going out on a limb and guess that you never served in the military at all. So here is a clue: No honest military will ever give the rosiest scenarios to petition for funding. You can start from there.
 
.
Russia and China ought ... of they have not already done so ... to develop space bases microwave energy weapons which would eliminate american satellites and space based weapons. The end game is coming and with america being crushes under it's own gargantuan debt, it will get desperate to go to war. For that reason, nations opposed to zionist-western hegemony, need to be ready for a fight to the finish.
 
.
By 2030 China will have 5 or 6 heavy carriers, plus about 5 light carriers. Would American service men and women willing to die for Taiwan? I think they won't.
I think if china attack Taiwan . USA will republish some of these from ww2 and then American become willing.
bf7705a6d8e87b74c5bd3b0e9f624c97.jpg

448px-%22WARNING_-_OUR_HOMES_ARE_IN_DANGER_NOW%22_-_NARA_-_516040.jpg

Anti-Japan2.png


they only need to change Japanese theme and replace it with Chinese theme . and see how American people follow propaganda
 
.
Yah keep on gathering, you can't even knock fat boy Kim down. Lol
Thats because CHina's goal isnt to take out Kim, its to prevent a western-oriented, Capitalism country on its border in the area where current North Korea is located.

Just another masturbatory article.

Exercise details are secrets like how ICBM technical data or how the president communicate with the military are secrets. It is at that level. So when a 'military official' said the US will 'lose' the war, in what context is that loss? Unless the details are divulged, articles like these are analogous to Playboy playmates with their shallow bios: attractive but ultimately meaningless.
Seems like you are getting the message but not the point. The point is that in the US's pending or tentative clashes in the Middle East or/and SCS, US will take serious damage. Thats the point. but lemme guess, you wont get it. cheers.

The US isn’t deterred.
THen why did the US pull bombers from Guam recently?

We’re literally flying and sailing near Chinese coastlines weekly.
Achieving what exactly? Iran has already stolen Iraq from under US WHILE US was occupying IRaq, so US has a pattern of doing alot of extra military things that result in little(this is also why US citizens across the board are wary of war, because they end up being long, expensive, and we get nothing).

A US P-8 was flying only 30 miles off of Hainan last week with no Chinese response.
Doing the same BS like in Iraq- controlling what is easy for you but irrelevant to the war situation - the sky. You control teh sky in Iraq and Iran controls the ground and you lost, same in Afghanistan, you control the sky, but the Taliban control the ground and you just accepted their domination of most of Afghanistan.
And the US also has a ton of weapons it can choose from to destroy Chinese ambitions.
Are you talking about how the US also destroyed the Taliban's "ambition"? Or Iran's ambition? I feel this comment is just fantasy writing.
 
.
godness me!!! too much usa worshippers , inside and outside USa on pdf.
just wait for this to happen .. you guys are talking like donald trump

china will not be alone , to fight usa. And they will be fighting for their home.. its much harder to attack thousands of miles awya from your house .. we shall see.
 
.
USA has never gone to a war with nuclear foe and that's not going to change ever.

Americans here are just full of hot air. Not a single war won by this so called superpower!
 
.
Seems like you are getting the message but not the point. The point is that in the US's pending or tentative clashes in the Middle East or/and SCS, US will take serious damage. Thats the point. but lemme guess, you wont get it. cheers.
I get it better than you do simply due to the fact I actually served and done a few exercises. It is YOU who do not get it. You do not get it because you do not want to know something that is deeper than the shallow knowledge that you currently have. You need this masturbatory dream that the US will lose in a war with China. You need this fantasy more than reality.
 
.
I get it better than you do simply due to the fact I actually served and done a few exercises. It is YOU who do not get it. You do not get it because you do not want to know something that is deeper than the shallow knowledge that you currently have. You need this masturbatory dream that the US will lose in a war with China. You need this fantasy more than reality.
Serving as the cook or floor cleaner?
 
. .
Title is bit misleading, Instead of stating, US will lose, It should state, China will succeed against US invasion or US might not be successful in Chinese pacific invasion. Big difference if you understand the Balance of Power.
 
. .
When America couldn't beat small countries like Afghanistan and Vietnam, how the **** can it win against China in its own turf? America can only talk shit and hide behind proxies like Al Qaeda and PKK to do it's dirty work for it.
 
.
US could not prevent North Korea developing nukes despite having B-2 and F-22. North Korea kept on developing and firing missiles while the US stood by and did nothing simply because it is afraid.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom