What's new

US ultimatum to Hasina: Exit constitutionally by Nov 3 or face the music

Black_cats

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
-5

US ultimatum to Hasina: Exit constitutionally by Nov 3 or face the music​

American Deputy Assistant Secretary Afreen Akhter is believed to have conveyed the US government’s message to the Awami League regime; constitutional expert Shahdeen Malik says Hasina will defy such a move​

Chandan Nandy
byChandan Nandy

October 17, 2023

US ultimatum to Hasina: Exit constitutionally by Nov 3 or face the music
Deputy Assistant Secretary us, Afreen Akhter. (photo:Twitter)


The ruling Awami League government has been told in no uncertain terms by a senior United States official, who recently visited Dhaka, that the Sheikh Hasina regime may consider stepping down from power and hand over charge to the Jatiya Sangshad speaker by November 3, well-placed government sources have revealed to Northeast News.

Given the high stakes that are involved, it is unlikely that the Awami League in general and Sheikh Hasina in particular will readily comply with the US pressure to relinquish power, especially at a time when there is massive anti-incumbency besides grave charges of corruption, human rights abuses, malgovernance, among other issues, against the current regime.

Speaking strictly on conditions of anonymity, the sources said that this message was conveyed to senior Bangladeshi officials by American Deputy Assistant Secretary (South Asia and Central Asia) Afreen Akhter during her meeting with Bangladesh foreign secretary Masud Bin Momen on October 16.

Besides raising the fraught issue of free, fair and participatory elections in Bangladesh, Akhter also discussed with the subjects of Rohingya refugees and the recent visit of a bipartisan American delegation comprising members of two important American think tanks with Momen, who confirmed this to reporters later the same day. Bangladesh Ministry of Foreign Affairs director general Masud Alam was present during the meeting between Akhter and Momen.

The Bangladesh foreign secretary had reacted sharply, saying that “Bangladesh objects to unnecessary foreign interference in its internal affairs”. The sources said that Akhter placed two options before her Bangladeshi hosts, eight days before Sheikh Hasina is set to leave for Brussels on an official tour. As part of the first option, Sheikh Hasina government could resign and hand over charge to President Mohammad Shahabuddin who, incidentally left for Singapore on October 16 and is not expected to return to the country before October 30.

The last session of the Jatiya Sangshad is set to begin on October 22 and the government of the day will likely declare the official election notification in the last week of this month or the first week of November.

The second option, the US official presented before Momen and Masud, recommended transfer of power by the incumbent Awami League government to Speaker Shirin Sharmin Chaudhury by November 3 before paving the way for a truly free, fair, participatory and inclusive elections. “The US prefers that the Sheikh Hasina regime opts for the second course,” a source, fully aware of the details of the American proposals, said.

Chaudhury was in New Delhi last week to take part in the Ninth G20 Parliamentary Speakers’ Summit (P20). She had met Indian officials on the sidelines of the P20.

The bases of the two options presented before the Bangladeshi leadership was that both were “within the framework of the Constitution” and therefore could be acted upon and considered by the government. Chapter II of Part IV of the Bangladeshi constitution says:

“(1) The office of the Prime Minister shall become vacant

(a) if he resigns from office at any time by placing his resignation in the hands of the President; or (b) if he ceases to be a member of Parliament.

(2) If the Prime Minister ceases to retain the support of a majority of the members of Parliament, he shall either resign his office or advise the President in writing to dissolve Parliament, and if he so advises the President shall, if he is satisfied that no other member of Parliament commands the support of the majority of the members of Parliament, dissolve Parliament accordingly”.

Also, Article 54 of the constitution says that “If a vacancy occurs in the office of President or if the President is unable to discharge the functions of his office on account of his absence, illness or any other cause, the Speaker shall discharge those functions until a President is elected or until the President assumes the functions of his office, as the case may be”.

Importantly, it was indicated by the US deputy assistant secretary that failure to comply with the two options – but preferably the second – would be followed by a series of strong economic sanctions against Bangladeshi individuals, including influential businessmen and political leaders.

In the event of the ruling Awami League chosing to disregard the US “ultimatum”, as one source described the two options, the American authorities are said to have told their interlocutors in Dhaka that due processes of law would follow against a “high value” Bangladeshi individual residing in that country.

Speaking to Northeast News, one of Bangladesh’s foremost constitutional experts, Shahdeen Malik, said that in the event of a situation, political or otherwise, “the prime minister will have to advise the president to dissolve parliament till the time fresh elections are held. The president, in turn, will ask the cabinet to continue. And, in the event the president is indisposed, for whatever reasons, the speaker will fulfill his duties and responsibilities”.

Agreeing that there “are lots of faults with the 15th amendment to the constitution”, Malik said that “it will be politically suicidal for her if she gives in to demands to quit”. Malik concluded that “Sheikh Hasina will defy such moves” and that he “apprehends the regime will turn repressive”.

Tags: American Deputy Assistant SecretaryBangladesh Ministry of Foreign AffairsBangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina
Chandan Nandy

Chandan Nandy

Chandan Nandy is a senior journalist based in New Delhi.
 
. . . . .
What's the issue between Uncle Same and Hasina? corruption or human rights violation is non-issue for Uncle Sam
Uncle sam wants something that Hasina cant deliver... he wants total dominance over the foreign policy of Bangladesh... Hasina needs Chinese assistance to stay in power, on the other hand, Uncle Sam wants to play with the dragon from BoB...yes, there is severe corruption and human rights violation , but we all know uncle sam doesn't give a f**k about these issues...they are just using these issues as tools to dismantle hasina government.. the next governmnt of Bangladesh will be more pro US or pro india for sure...
 
.
Uncle sam wants something that Hasina cant deliver... he wants total dominance over the foreign policy of Bangladesh... Hasina needs Chinese assistance to stay in power, on the other hand, Uncle Sam wants to play with the dragon from BoB...yes, there is severe corruption and human rights violation , but we all know uncle sam doesn't give a f**k about these issues...they are just using these issues as tools to dismantle hasina government.. the next governmnt of Bangladesh will be more pro US or pro india for sure...

I think Hasina has been as Pro-India as it can be, but perhaps you are right, it may not be supporting Uncle Sam as much he wants. if this is the case then I am afraid the Govt. Uncle Sam will install may be worse for Public. Anyway, best of luck.
 
.
USA wants free and fair election in BD. If this happens BAL will be history and BNP will win. BNP have to fulfill American wishes for obvious reasons.
.
Although I don't see much problem in a Pro USA government or you can say American puppet government. USA is and always was a good friend of Bangladesh. They helped us a lot. But, Im afraid we will be forced to take American selected side on india china war.
.
Without our transit, Chinese military will r*pe indian military on north eastern side without even sweating.
 
.
USA wants free and fair election in BD. If this happens BAL will be history and BNP will win. BNP have to fulfill American wishes for obvious reasons.
.
Although I don't see much problem in a Pro USA government or you can say American puppet government. USA is and always was a good friend of Bangladesh. They helped us a lot. But, Im afraid we will be forced to take American selected side on india china war.
.
Without our transit, Chinese military will r*pe indian military on north eastern side without even sweating.
It is too simplification of saying the USA just wants a pro-Western govt in BD. This is certainly a reason. But, the deeper one is to bottle up China from almost all sides.

China is planning to enter the BoB via Burma with BD on its side. America wants to stop this Chinese ploy. Please note that in times of an emergency or warlike situation, America can block the Malacca Strait disallowing Chinese ships to pass through.

With Chinese easy access to the BoB via Burma, American policy of bottling up China within its border does not work. And I believe this is one reason that America wants a pro-China govt in Dhaka.

China bottled up within its border without Sea access for foreign trade. Gwadder port cannot be a substitute. It is too far away from the main manufacturing centers in the East China Sea.

This is a Cold War situation and many things are psychological. It is not that America or China seeks a war. But, America wants China to remain humble and dependent upon America mercy.

America knows that the BAL party will lose a fair election and this will serve American interest.
 
.
I think US wants to see some religious violence in Bangladesh, by bringing Hasina's opponents in power.
Another day, another conflict.
 
.
It is too simplification of saying the USA just wants a pro-Western govt in BD. This is certainly a reason. But, the deeper one is to bottle up China from almost all sides.

China is planning to enter the BoB via Burma with BD on its side. America wants to stop this Chinese ploy. Please note that in times of an emergency or warlike situation, America can block the Malacca Strait disallowing Chinese ships to pass through.

With Chinese easy access to the BoB via Burma, American policy of bottling up China within its border does not work. And I believe this is one reason that America wants a pro-China govt in Dhaka.

China bottled up within its border without Sea access for foreign trade. Gwadder port cannot be a substitute. It is too far away from the main manufacturing centers in the East China Sea.

This is a Cold War situation and many things are psychological. It is not that America or China seeks a war. But, America wants China to remain humble and dependent upon America mercy.

America knows that the BAL party will lose a fair election and this will serve American interest.

Myanmar military junta has no interest in Chinese presence on their soil. They are not that stupid
 
.
What's the issue between Uncle Same and Hasina? corruption or human rights violation is non-issue for Uncle Sam

Usa most likely wants anti Chinese government in Bangladesh. Hasina is being friendly with everyone, not acceptable. They don't care about human rights violations or free and fair elections.
 
.
Usa most likely wants anti Chinese government in Bangladesh. Hasina is being friendly with everyone, not acceptable. They don't care about human rights violations or free and fair elections.

That does not make sense. Bangladesh has limited economic issues with China. Hasina is friendly with India. That may be an issue for Uncle Sam.

In any case I expect Bangladesh to thumb its nose at America. Which autocrat wants to give up power ?
 
.
How reliable is Northeast news? Before commenting on the issue we need to verify the authenticity of the news item presented before us.
 
.
Myanmar military junta has no interest in Chinese presence on their soil. They are not that stupid
How do you know what MM leaders are thinking right now? Or do you think China has no ambition in Burma? Is it not supporting Burma with arms and planes, and vetoed against BD in the UN in favor of Burma on the Rohingya issue? Russia similarly supported Burma.

It is easy for China to control a Burmese dictatorship. China wants to connect with the BoB through Burma. So, it becomes another trade route like the Malacca Strait.

China wants BD to give it a support to its ambition. No wonder, China provides loans to BD albeit with a high interest rate.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom