What's new

US talking to Turnbull government about stepping up presence of B-1 Bomber war planes in Australia

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
The United States is talking to the Turnbull government about stepping up the presence of US long-range strike bombers in Australia in a further deepening of the alliance as China continues to provoke concern.

General Lori Robinson, Commander of the US Pacific Air Forces, said in Canberra on Tuesday that with China's "militarisation" of the South China Sea, the US and its partners had to "maintain a credible combat power".

She said China's military build-up raised the risk of "miscalculation" in which conflict is sparked by some unexpected incident.

And she echoed fellow senior US military figures in urging other countries, including Australia, to continue flying and sailing through the South China Sea in the face of China's growing military presence such as the stationing of surface-to-air missiles and fighter jets.

To strengthen military ties, US bombers – including possibly supersonic B-1 strike bombers – and aerial refuelling tankers would regularly rotate through northern Australia rather than conducting exercises on an ad hoc basis.

"We're in the process of talking about rotational forces, bombers and tankers out of Australia," General Robinson said.

"It gives us the opportunity to train with Australia … it gives us the opportunity to strengthen the ties we already have with the Royal Australian Air Force and it gives us the opportunity to train our pilots and understand the theatre."

She said they would operate out of Tindal and Darwin air bases. When the rotations start, how frequent they would be, and how long US personnel remain in Australia were all still to be finalised, she said.

"It would be useful to train across the spectrum of capability. Does that mean we're going to have B-1s and B-52s and that? I don't know yet because we're still working our way through the details of that."

US B-52s have trained in Australia before. But the presence of B-1 Lancer bombers would be significant as they have a much longer range than the older B-52s and could easily reach the contested area of the South China Sea.

When a US official, David Shear, said last May that the US meant to fly B-1s out of Australia, his remarks were played down by Canberra but not before Beijing expressed "serious concern" about the prospect.

The B-1 carries the largest weapons payload of any US plane. It can carry a wide range of conventional weapons including cruise missiles and GPS-guided precision bombs.

B-1s have pummelled Taliban targets in Afghanistan and done heavy damage to Islamic State targets in Iraq and Syria. A retired US Air Force general told the Washington Post recently that one B-1 could drop as many bombs as 40 fighter jets.

Defence Minister Marise Payne said the talks were part of the Force Posture Initiative begun by former prime minister Julia Gillard and finalised by Tony Abbott. She confirmed it would "result in increased rotations of US Air Force elements through northern Australia".

"Australia remains strongly supportive of the US rebalance to our near region, and we work together closely in support of our common regional interests," she said.

General Robinson, a four-star general and one of the US military's most senior women commanders, warned of the "seriousness of tone that is being set by China's militarisation of the South China Sea".

"As Admiral Harris, US Pacific Command commander and my boss, repeatedly stated over the past few weeks, we must continue to maintain a credible combat power and we must continue to exercise our freedom to fly and sail in international air space and waters, and encourage partners and allies to do the same, or risk losing it throughout the region," she said.

United States talking to Turnbull government about stepping up presence of B-1 Bomber war planes in Australia
 
.
Long-range heavy bombers could be based in Australia, US general reveals - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

By defence reporter Andrew Greene

Updated about 5 hours ago
Tue 8 Mar 2016, 10:44am



Photo: A US official has confirmed B-1 bombers could be stationed in Australia in a joint operation with the RAAF. (US Air Force/Staff Sgt Bennie J Davis III)

The United States wants to regularly rotate long-range heavy bombers through Australia, as concerns grow over China's military expansion in the Asia-Pacific region.

Commander of US Pacific Air Forces, General Lori Robinson, has revealed high-level discussions are underway to have American B-1 bombers and aerial tankers temporarily stationed in the Northern Territory.

"We're in the process of talking about rotational forces, bombers and tankers out of Australia (Tindal and Darwin) and it gives us the opportunity to train with Australia", she told reporters in Canberra.

"It gives us the opportunity to strengthen the ties we already have with the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) and it gives the opportunity to train our pilots to understand the theatre and how important it is to strengthen our ties with our great allies, the RAAF."

While acknowledging the risk of a "miscalculation" as a result of China's rapid military build up in the South China Sea, General Robinson insisted the United States would continue to fly above and sail through the disputed waterway.

General Robinson is the latest US official to publicly call on Australia to conduct Freedom of Navigation Operations in the South China Sea.

"We would encourage anybody in the region and around the world to fly and sail in international air space in accordance with international rules and norms" she said.

"We would encourage all nations in the region to do just that, just as the United States is doing" General Robinson added.

Features of the B-1 bomber:
  • Manufactured by Boeing
  • Has the largest internal payload of any current bomber
  • Capable of rapidly delivering 84 227-kilogram bombs
  • Intended for high-speed, low-altitude penetration missions
  • Entered into service in 1986 in United States Air Force as a nuclear bomber
  • Is no longer armed with nuclear weapons, but is capable of carrying air launch cruise and short-range attack missiles
Last year former Prime Minister Tony Abbott insisted a senior US official had "misspoke" when he told a congressional hearing there were plans to station long-range American bombers and surveillance aircraft in Australia.

Appearing before the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee in May, US Defence Department Assistant Secretary David Shear said the Pentagon would be "placing additional air force assets in Australia" including "B-1 bombers and surveillance aircraft".

Australian Minister for Defence Marise Payne refused to be drawn on the deployment of long-range bombers, but said the US Air Force would have a larger presence in the country.

"The Enhanced Air Cooperation Initiative, which is part of the Force Posture Initiative, is in development and will result in increased rotations of US Air Force elements through Northern Australia," Senator Payne said.
 
.
B-1 bombers will be vulnerable to HQ9. B-2 is more suitable.


US should put lot of F-22 or J-35 in Korea/Japan/Vietnam.
 
.
B-1 bombers will be vulnerable to HQ9. B-2 is more suitable.


US should put lot of F-22 or J-35 in Korea/Japan/Vietnam.

From where your assumption is came from?

With stand off weapons like JASSM and JSOW, they are out of range of any Air Defense System currently exist in the world
 
.
From where your assumption is came from?

With stand off weapons like JASSM and JSOW, they are out of range of any Air Defense System currently exist in the world

You seems to forget, Chinese weapon see all and kill all. They do not have any latency nor does they ever go malfunction. If the Chinese weapon were designed to a purpose, they will achieve that purpose no matter what. If it does not make sense nor were you able to explain it, it is because current physics cannot explain the god like feature of Chinese weaponry. And also because you are wrong to doubt the Chinese weapon capability...

If HQ-9 were designed to shoot down aircraft, then EVERYTHING that flies, they will be able to shoot it down, it's simple as that.

LOL

On a serious note : This is never going to happen. Australia will not allow US to station a airlift squadron back in 2005, they won't allow a strike squadron in Australia soil, let alone a nuclear capable one.
 
.
For now it will be the B-1 Lancer, but in the future, it is likely that the US will deploy the in-still-development LRS-B /B-21 bomber.
 
.
You seems to forget, Chinese weapon see all and kill all. They do not have any latency nor does they ever go malfunction. If the Chinese weapon were designed to a purpose, they will achieve that purpose no matter what. If it does not make sense nor were you able to explain it, it is because current physics cannot explain the god like feature of Chinese weaponry. And also because you are wrong to doubt the Chinese weapon capability...

If HQ-9 were designed to shoot down aircraft, then EVERYTHING that flies, they will be able to shoot it down, it's simple as that.

LOL

On a serious note : This is never going to happen. Australia will not allow US to station a airlift squadron back in 2005, they won't allow a strike squadron in Australia soil, let alone a nuclear capable one.

Hey did anything ever become of this...there was talk and then all went quiet:

US Eyes Cocos Islands As Spy Base | smh.com.au
 
.
This is useless in the wars among China/Russia/United States. As long as China can deliver Nukes to Washington, this kind of bombers will never attack China. It will only be used against countries such as Iraq, Vietnam, or Philippines. VCP leaders worry more than Chinese because they could be the next Saddam or Gaddafi. Sooner or Later China will provide supply services for US Navy in SCS islands to cover some island reclamation cost.

To defend its hegemony, US has to develop policing tools for chaotic countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan, bombing machines for second rate countries such as Iran and Vietnam, and next generation weapons for China and Russia, while China can focus on next generation weapons such as hyper-sonic vehicles, anti-satellite weapons, anti-ship ballistic missiles. This asymmetric competition put great pressures on US defense R&D.
 
.
Hey did anything ever become of this...there was talk and then all went quiet:

US Eyes Cocos Islands As Spy Base | smh.com.au

Think I have heard that the USAF are using RAAF Darwin instead when the Australia went for Naval version of Global Hawk and do it themselves. We are building new site for USAF in RAAF Darwin and share the drone surveillance data.

Well, at least this is what I heard lol :)
 
.
From where your assumption is came from?

With stand off weapons like JASSM and JSOW, they are out of range of any Air Defense System currently exist in the world


Well, actually it is rather a common sense than assumption. B2 must be less vulnerable due to its stealth than B1.

Imagine B1 from Australia base is flying on the way to attack China military base say in Guangzhou or in Nanjing, then they pass south china sea and it happen there is Type 52D equipped with HQ9 :)

PLAAF-Military-Regions-DOD.png
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom