SubWater
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2017
- Messages
- 3,245
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Bashar Assad is head of Ba'ath party and as result he is leader of Arab world.Indeed we need 500 million Arabs alliance
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bashar Assad is head of Ba'ath party and as result he is leader of Arab world.Indeed we need 500 million Arabs alliance
Indeed I hope he will break from Iran and Russia to lead 500 million ArabsBashar Assad is head of Ba'ath party and as result he is leader of Arab world.
this mentality of yours is the reason of arab world miseries. still your country has not payed the compensation of war she imposed on us for 8 years. just for one second imagine that iran was not in syria or iraq, the result would be one of your arab brothers beheading you while other arab brother claiming the rest of your family of his possess. at the beginning of syrian civil war i was angry on IRI for helping bashar but afte looking at his oppositions i can understand the reason, because all other groups are savage people with one thing on their mind, "killing"They're cunts that need to know their place
Pan Arabism died with Gamal Nasser. If your solution to Turkish and Iranian interference is Pan-Arabism, then that means you're very likely to fail. Pan-Arabism's "attack dog" was Saddam, and he's gone. Daddy America will not likely interfere on your behalf anymore ,and even if US does, it will likely be at a very steep price.Yes we need pan Arabism because the Turks and Iranians are interfering in our affairs in the name of Islam
I agree Arab states should unite either militarily or economically or both. All the Arab countries together would be able to do a whole lot in terms of indigenous military production considering how many Arab countries have experience like Jordan, Saudi Arabia, The UAE.What kind of bullshit is that?
In other words: "It's okay that they are being maulicious to you because the whole world is". AKA, It is okay that India bombs Pakistani land because the USA has been doing the same with their drones.
**** outta here and take your lol with you.
Muslim states heh!
Pan Arabism died with Gamal Nasser. If your solution to Turkish and Iranian interference is Pan-Arabism, then that means you're very likely to fail. Pan-Arabism's "attack dog" was Saddam, and he's gone. Daddy America will not likely interfere on your behalf anymore ,and even if US does, it will likely be at a very steep price.
I guess i'm right then.The Iranian Nigerian cheerleader is back.
You're right- hypothetically.I agree Arab states should unite either militarily or economically or both. All the Arab countries together would be able to do a whole lot in terms of indigenous military production considering how many Arab countries have experience like Jordan, Saudi Arabia, The UAE.
And US and EU arent interfering in your countries? Your visible "partnerships" have only provided the best route for western interference. I'm just playing devil's advocate. Good example- Iraq cant even get the US out of its miitary bases in Iraq.Yes we need pan Arabism because the Turks and Iranians are interfering in our affairs in the name of Islam
Iraq's executive branch doesn't want the US military out of the bases, they didn't even try.I guess i'm right then.
You're right- hypothetically.
Problem is, the most motivating factor for people in this day and age is national/nation state interest. Not religion, not ethnic group(Arab), National interest. This is why arabs arent and cant unite effectively today- They all have different national interests. Arabs can look at each other and say- we speak the same language, have the same ethnic blood, follow the same religion, but thats not enough IF their national interests dont align.
And US and EU arent interfering in your countries? Your visible "partnerships" have only provided the best route for western interference. I'm just playing devil's advocate. Good example- Iraq cant even get the US out of its miitary bases in Iraq.
this mentality of yours is the reason of arab world miseries. still your country has not payed the compensation of war she imposed on us for 8 years. just for one second imagine that iran was not in syria or iraq, the result would be one of your arab brothers beheading you while other arab brother claiming the rest of your family of his possess. at the beginning of syrian civil war i was angry on IRI for helping bashar but afte looking at his oppositions i can understand the reason, because all other groups are savage people with one thing on their mind, "killing"
I disagree with this. There was at least 1 Chechen in ISIS top ranks who was in Iraq.ISIS is entirely Iraqi in its top command from the former regime's military so you can drop that other Arabs story as well.
What's your ava all about? Wanna conquer Turkey?
I disagree with this. There was at least 1 Chechen in ISIS top ranks who was in Iraq.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Omar_al-Shishani