Project 627
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2011
- Messages
- 327
- Reaction score
- 0
OK lets see
Don't worry as soon as it enters service, I will post a thread about it, so you''ll be the first to know fanboy.
Thanks. So it confirms my point: its compromised stealth vehicle which maintains Su-27's fuselage.
You have trouble reading, ok i will make the letters bigger
The aerodynamic configuration of the PAK-FA maintains a vague reference to the Su-27 as regards the fuselage and the location of the engines, which are installed in widely separated nacelles forming a tunnel with the flat bottom of the fuselage.
http://www.defpro.com/daily/details/506/
Another reject. You see, all prototypes without S-duct were rejected.
Again 500, your lack of knowledge is appalling, X-32 was rejected because of problems with its vertical lift up system not because it was not stealthy enough, and just because Lockheed Marten uses S-Duct for its stealth designs, it doesn't mean that everybody must uses it as well. Both Boeing and Northrop Grumman probably run thousands of tests on the radar blocker concept before installing it on their prototypes for government competition.
OMG, look the Japanese are planing to use the the radar blocker concept too, but haven't the Japanese and the Russian heard of the wise 500 he says stealth aircraft must only use S-duct
Mitsubishi ATD-X - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia