SalarHaqq
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
- Messages
- 4,569
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Correct analysis, however, all this admirable perseverance of Iran will need to have an eventual inflection point (think Nixon’s China moment).
Iran cannot stay under draconian economic siege forever. The oil buying by China is not enough to fundamentally expand the Iranian economy long term. Thus the longer the people of Iran stay under economic siege the more boiling of tempers of the local population = more riots & instability.
IRI shouldn’t make the same mistake as the shah and think he can’t survive every riot that comes its way. Indeed even in the last round of (mostly youth) riots we saw divisions starting to form within the leadership. In a future much stronger riot and discontent we could see much more distinct fractures which will allow the enemy ways to exploit the cause for their benefit (color revolution).
The inflection is when unilateral USA sanctions will no longer be heeded by third parties outside the likes of America's EU vassals, and when the G7 will be superseded economically more than it already is by emerging powers. To this day Washington has never been interested in a Nixon-style deal with the Islamic Republic, whenever they agreed to negotiate it was simply to try and impose a lopsided, unbalanced arrangement ultimately meant to disarm Iran.
During recent riots various opinions were expressed by officials when it comes to the dress code and what the police's role should be in its enforcing it, but about the need to quell violent riots there was no dissent to speak of. And security forces showed no sign of disloyalty.
Last edited: